Jump to content

User talk:GermanJoe/Archive 9

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 5Archive 7Archive 8Archive 9Archive 10Archive 11Archive 15

19:52, 26 February 2018 (UTC)

Editing News #1—2018

Read this in another languageSubscription list for the English WikipediaSubscription list for the multilingual edition

Did you know?

Did you know that you can now use the visual diff tool on any page?

Screenshot showing some changes, in the two-column wikitext diff display

Sometimes, it is hard to see important changes in a wikitext diff. This screenshot of a wikitext diff (click to enlarge) shows that the paragraphs have been rearranged, but it does not highlight the removal of a word or the addition of a new sentence.

If you enable the Beta Feature for "⧼visualeditor-preference-visualdiffpage-label⧽", you will have a new option. It will give you a new box at the top of every diff page. This box will let you choose either diff system on any edit.

Toggle button showing visual and wikitext options; visual option is selected

Click the toggle button to switch between visual and wikitext diffs.

In the visual diff, additions, removals, new links, and formatting changes will be highlighted. Other changes, such as changing the size of an image, are described in notes on the side.

Screenshot showing the same changes to an article. Most changes are highlighted with text formatting.

This screenshot shows the same edit as the wikitext diff. The visual diff highlights the removal of one word and the addition of a new sentence. An arrow indicates that the paragraph changed location.

You can read and help translate the user guide, which has more information about how to use the visual editor.

Since the last newsletter, the Editing Team has spent most of their time supporting the 2017 wikitext editor mode, which is available inside the visual editor as a Beta Feature, and improving the visual diff tool. Their work board is available in Phabricator. You can find links to the work finished each week at mw:VisualEditor/Weekly triage meetings. Their current priorities are fixing bugs, supporting the 2017 wikitext editor, and improving the visual diff tool.

Recent changes

  • The 2017 wikitext editor is available as a Beta Feature on desktop devices. It has the same toolbar as the visual editor and can use the citoid service and other modern tools. The team have been comparing the performance of different editing environments. They have studied how long it takes to open the page and start typing. The study uses data for more than one million edits during December and January. Some changes have been made to improve the speed of the 2017 wikitext editor and the visual editor. Recently, the 2017 wikitext editor opened fastest for most edits, and the 2010 WikiEditor was fastest for some edits. More information will be posted at mw:Contributors/Projects/Editing performance.
  • The visual diff tool was developed for the visual editor. It is now available to all users of the visual editor and the 2017 wikitext editor. When you review your changes, you can toggle between wikitext and visual diffs. You can also enable the new Beta Feature for "Visual diffs". The Beta Feature lets you use the visual diff tool to view other people's edits on page histories and Special:RecentChanges. [11]
  • Wikitext syntax highlighting is available as a Beta Feature for both the 2017 wikitext editor and the 2010 wikitext editor. [12]
  • The citoid service automatically translates URLs, DOIs, ISBNs, and PubMed id numbers into wikitext citation templates. This tool has been used at the English Wikipedia for a long time. It is very popular and useful to editors, although it can be tricky for admins to set up. Other wikis can have this service, too. Please read the instructions. You can ask the team to help you enable citoid at your wiki.

Let's work together

  • The team is planning a presentation about editing tools for an upcoming Wikimedia Foundation metrics and activities meeting.
  • Wikibooks, Wikiversity, and other communities may have the visual editor made available by default to contributors. If your community wants this, then please contact Dan Garry.
  • The <references /> block can automatically display long lists of references in columns on wide screens. This makes footnotes easier to read. This has already been enabled at the English Wikipedia. If you want columns for a long list of footnotes on this wiki, you can use either <references /> or the plain (no parameters) {{reflist}} template. If you edit a different wiki, you can request multi-column support for your wiki. [13]
  • If you aren't reading this in your preferred language, then please help us with translations! Subscribe to the Translators mailing list or contact us directly. We will notify you when the next issue is ready for translation. Thank you!

User:Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 23:14, 28 February 2018 (UTC)

17:12, 5 March 2018 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXLIII, March 2018

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 10:36, 12 March 2018 (UTC)

19:44, 12 March 2018 (UTC)

Request

Hello. Help improve the quality of Maureen Wroblewitz. Thanks you very much.171.248.53.250 (talk) 09:49, 13 March 2018 (UTC)

Hello. I am sorry, but I am not knowledgeable about model articles, so won't be of much help. After a brief look, a few quick tips though: the article focusses far too much on trivial and secondary details, such as routine guest appearances and commercial PR endorsements. Such content should be trimmed down, not developed any further. An encyclopedic article should focus on her main accomplishments, and only on the most significant details of her career and life. Regarding sources: the vast majority of used sources are social media annoucements and low-quality lifestyle reporting. Their usage should be reduced and replaced with reliable journalistic sources whereever possible. Hope these tips are helpful, even though I probably won't be able to help with further improvements. GermanJoe (talk) 17:54, 13 March 2018 (UTC)
FYI, this is Haiyenslna. — JJMC89(T·C) 18:28, 18 March 2018 (UTC)
I see. The post seemed somewhat odd to begin with, coming out of the blue. But I AGF-ed anyway just to be on the safe side - thanks for the info. GermanJoe (talk) 18:33, 18 March 2018 (UTC)

MITx

Hi GermanJoe, I appreciate your edits for the most part. However, I disagree with the one on MITx as you have reverted it to "Learners who successfully complete course requirements in the verified track receive a certificate of accomplishment, but no academic credit is offered." That is no longer true with the launch of their MicroMasters program, a page I have created and currently awaiting approval. MIT has admitted its first batch of students through its edX platform with advanced standing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Clarevoyance (talkcontribs)

Hello @Clarevoyance:, thank you for pointing this out. I have removed the outdated information (it was unsourced anyway). Of course you could re-insert a brief mention of the actual situation, if you can find a truely independent reliable source with details about it. By the way, please sign your posts with 4 tilde characters ~~~~ at the end. This will automatically add your user signature and a timestamp. Best regards. GermanJoe (talk) 14:54, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
No problem and thank you! Clarevoyance (talk) 15:01, 19 March 2018 (UTC)

15:03, 19 March 2018 (UTC)

Hi @GermanJoe: you reverted an edit I made to Online dating service because, I think, you believe it to be an external link in the main body of the article. It isn’t though - it’s a link to another Wikipedia article. Mccapra (talk) 04:19, 23 March 2018 (UTC)

Hello @Mccapra:, thank you for pointing this out. I guess the link's name with a ".com" threw me off in a hasty edit, apologies for the erroneous edit summary. Still, I believe it would be better to omit this Wiki-link and add the site to Comparison of online dating websites instead, where all Wiki-notable sites with their own articles are listed. Per WP:EASTEREGG we should generally avoid linking terms to differing topics: so a link on "online dating service for Jewish people" should only link to a general article about this broad topic, not to 1 specific provider of such services (JWed is also not the only provider, as far as I know). Please feel free to ask me if you have further questions. Best regards. GermanJoe (talk) 12:12, 23 March 2018 (UTC)
hi @GermanJoe: I agree that sounds sensible. Thanks Mccapra (talk) 23:10, 23 March 2018 (UTC)

20:04, 26 March 2018 (UTC)

April 2018 Milhist Backlog Drive

G'day all, please be advised that throughout April 2018 the Military history Wikiproject is running its annual backlog elimination drive. This will focus on several key areas:

  • tagging and assessing articles that fall within the project's scope
  • adding or improving listed resources on Milhist's task force pages
  • updating the open tasks template on Milhist's task force pages
  • creating articles that are listed as "requested" on the project's various lists of missing articles.

As with past Milhist drives, there are points awarded for working on articles in the targeted areas, with barnstars being awarded at the end for different levels of achievement.

The drive is open to all Wikipedians, not just members of the Military history project, although only work on articles that fall (broadly) within the scope of military history will be considered eligible. This year, the Military history project would like to extend a specific welcome to members of Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red, and we would like to encourage all participants to consider working on helping to improve our coverage of women in the military. This is not the sole focus of the edit-a-thon, though, and there are aspects that hopefully will appeal to pretty much everyone.

The drive starts at 00:01 UTC on 1 April and runs until 23:59 UTC on 30 April 2018. Those interested in participating can sign up here.

For the Milhist co-ordinators, AustralianRupert and MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:53, 27 March 2018 (UTC)


March 2018 The Herbstman Collection "Spam" Editing you did

IMPORTANT MESSAGE TO GERMANJOE MARCH 30, 2018

Dear Sir,

You removed a link from several articles that WAS NOT SPAM. This links was to an educational online liberty that has provided much content for many articles on Wikipedia. As the administrator of this online museum, I wish to inform you that it holds the copyright for the rare images that it has contributed to many Wiki articles.

As you may not be familiar with this online resource, this online financial library has contributed to the U.S. Federal Reserve, the Museum of American Finance, and several major universities its material from visual archives, all for the purpose of educating the public on US Financial History and the US National Debt. This non-profit takes in NO MONEY and SELLS NOTHING. It is purely educational.

It is entitled to make contributions to Wikipedia, and be cited as an external link. Here is the quote taken from Wikipedia: External Links: What Can Normally be Linked:

        3. Sites that contain neutral and accurate material that is relevant to an encyclopedic understanding of the subject and cannot be integrated into the Wikipedia article due to copyright issues.. 

By labeling the External Link to this as "SPAM," you unfairly diminish the work of this non-profit. Indeed, many Museums and other institutions contribute to Wikipedia, and have their external links accordingly. I hope this is a simple misunderstanding, and that you will no longer target the work this institution as contributed to Wikipedia. Please contact me if you wish to discuss. I thank you

Hello @JHerbstman:, thank you for your message. A minor technical point: please sign your messages in Wikipedia talkpages and forums with 4 tilde characters ~~~~ at the end. This will add an automatic signature.
Non-profits and charitable organizations are not exempt from our linking policies, in fact no external contributor is. I wasn't diminishing your site's external work, but non-profit organizations are just as capable of self-promotion as commercial enterprises - and such activities are fully prohibited here no matter the circumstances. When other editors revert additions for your own or closely-connected sites, please do not re-insert them but suggest such links on the article's talkpage (see also WP:SELFCITE "when in doubt ..." regarding references).
Regarding external links: I have kept the added external links to your website now, but you should ask for feedback from other uninvolved editors before you add more links to other articles. If possible (depending on your site's layout), such links should directly point to topic-related information instead of a general root domain, where the reader must continue to search for specific information. That would make access to the topic-related information easier for interested readers.
Regarding image captions: Image information like source and attribution are usually not provided in the image caption, but in the image's file page (I have removed these redundant references again). See MOS:CAPTION and MOS:CREDITS for more details.
I hope this additional information is helpful, but please feel free to ask if you have any further questions. Best regards. GermanJoe (talk) 18:11, 30 March 2018 (UTC)

Thank you GermanJoe for getting back so quickly. As a non-expert in Wikipedia, I value help (including yours) in making sure the contributions I make comply with spirit of the Wikipedia platform. I wanted to let you know that the edits for each of the External Links submitted, I believed we were sending readers directly to the relevant part of the collection were they could learn more about that particular part of US Treasury Bond history. Again, I am no expert in Wikipedia editing, and appreciate any help!

FYI, our Foundation is, to date, the only one of its kind in the world that has systematically organized a "visual history" of United States Treasury debt. Believe it or not, most of the Treasury Bond imagery available online (i.e. a Google Image Search) are images either taken from numismatic auction houses, dealers, or private collectors. With the US National Debt being a very important subject matter, our Foundation's aim is simply to allow the public free and open access to some of the visual history of this debt. In an age where everything seems to be online, I realize this may sound odd, but NONETHELESS:

       There are no publicly available catalogues of the visual history of US Treasury Bonds. The Herbstman Collection was the first of its kind,  and so I hope this explains some of my passion on this matter.

I really appreciate your help in this. Best wishes. User:JHerbstman —Preceding undated comment added 18:36, 30 March 2018 (UTC)

Hello, @JHerbstman:, I am glad I could help with a few points (and really wasn't trying to dismiss your site's off-Wiki accomplishments). About that technical aspect for external links: the currently added external links point to the "root domain" of your website http://www.theherbstmancollection.com, not to a specific topic section. For example, if you wanted to link to your specific page about the "War of 1812 notes", you would use http://www.theherbstmancollection.com/war-of-1812 as link instead. This will skip your site's front page and directly lead the reader to the topic-relevant content. Other similar sub-pages seem to exist for all other sub-collections, and just need to be replaced accordingly. Best regards. GermanJoe (talk) 19:03, 30 March 2018 (UTC)


Making the updates as we speak! Thank you again for all of your help!User:JHerbstman —Preceding undated comment added 19:32, 30 March 2018 (UTC)

Thank you again GermanJoe. Your help has really been appreciated! User:JHerbstman

19:28, 2 April 2018 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXLIIV, April 2018

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 09:55, 8 April 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for infobox reformat

Thanks for fixing the infobox on HMS Blackpool. I didn't know what was wrong with the format and I appreciate the help. :) Matthewethanchowtoy (talk) 01:09, 9 April 2018 (UTC)

Thank You

Thank You for the tips. Check out my new User page. PW102281 (talk) 01:27, 9 April 2018 (UTC)

18:08, 9 April 2018 (UTC)

Userbox Template.

Can I adjust Userbox templates to make something on my userpage?PW102281 (talk) 19:27, 9 April 2018 (UTC)

@PW102281: - pre-defined userboxes should usually not be changed (as these templates are shared among hundreds and thousands of editors. Some of them have parameters to add user-specific information, but that depends on the specific template and you'd have to look up the template's documentation for details. You can also create (and freely change) your "own" userboxes, see Wikipedia:Userboxes for more info. But I haven't created any of these myself, so my experience in this aspect is limited. Hope this helps a bit. GermanJoe (talk) 20:33, 9 April 2018 (UTC)

15:20, 16 April 2018 (UTC)

Upcoming changes to wikitext parsing

Hello,

There will be some changes to the way wikitext is parsed during the next few weeks. It will affect all namespaces. You can see a list of pages that may display incorrectly at Special:LintErrors. Since most of the easy problems have already been solved at the English Wikipedia, I am specifically contacting tech-savvy editors such as yourself with this one-time message, in the hope that you will be able to investigate the remaining high-priority pages during the next month.

There are approximately 10,000 articles (and many more non-article pages) with high-priority errors. The most important ones are the articles with misnested tags and table problems. Some of these involve templates, such as infoboxes, or the way the template is used in the article. In some cases, the "error" is a minor, unimportant difference in the visual appearance. In other cases, the results are undesirable. You can see a before-and-after comparison of any article by adding ?action=parsermigration-edit to the end of a link, like this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arthur_Foss?action=parsermigration-edit (which shows a difference in how {{infobox ship}} is parsed).

If you are interested in helping with this project, please see Wikipedia:Linter. There are also some basic instructions (and links to even more information) at https://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikitech-ambassadors/2018-April/001836.html You can also leave a note at WT:Linter if you have questions.

Thank you for all the good things you do for the English Wikipedia. Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 21:18, 19 April 2018 (UTC)

Invitation to WikiProject Portals

The Portals WikiProject has been rebooted.

You are invited to join, and participate in the effort to revitalize and improve the Portal system and all the portals in it.

There are sections on the WikiProject page dedicated to tasks (including WikiGnome tasks too), and areas on the talk page for discussing the improvement and automation of the various features of portals.

Many complaints have been lodged in the RfC to delete all portals, pointing out their various problems. They say that many portals are not maintained, or have fallen out of date, are useless, etc. Many of the !votes indicate that the editors who posted them simply don't believe in the potential of portals anymore.

It's time to change all that. Let's give them reasons to believe in portals, by revitalizing them.

The best response to a deletion nomination is to fix the page that was nominated. The further underway the effort is to improve portals by the time the RfC has run its course, the more of the reasons against portals will no longer apply. RfCs typically run 30 days. There are 19 days left in this one. Let's see how many portals we can update and improve before the RfC is closed, and beyond.

A healthy WikiProject dedicated to supporting and maintaining portals may be the strongest argument of all not to delete.

We may even surprise ourselves and exceed all expectations. Who knows what we will be able to accomplish in what may become the biggest Wikicollaboration in years.

Let's do this.

See ya at the WikiProject!

Sincerely,    — The Transhumanist   10:21, 21 April 2018 (UTC)

18:16, 23 April 2018 (UTC)

16:18, 30 April 2018 (UTC)

about kurd mastiff (pshdar)

Hello. the kurdish breed has a many diffrents to kangal dog. for example

1- soft and loose skin 2-big dewlap (jowl) 3-non-cartilaginous eyers 4- body anatomy(like fish ; wide brisket and thin back) 5- coat colors (black,blue,gray) 6-longer history (5000 years a go-assyrian in today kurdistan area)

this is (special )breed dog.

thanks for editing my article

Mohamad137026 (talk) 15:27, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
@Mohamad137026:, the best place to discuss this would really be Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Dogs, where other editors with more knowledge about dog-related topics may be able to offer additional advice. See also my WP:Teahouse answer for additional tips (just in case you haven't seen it already). Hope this helps a bit, but I won't be able to offer breed-related content advice (just general Wiki tips and observations). GermanJoe (talk) 16:38, 30 April 2018 (UTC)

Good-faith edits

Apologies for my poor edits to Blue State Digital with names of people who don't have Wikipedia pages. I should have created well-researched and referenced pages first before adding any names to notable alumni. Sorry if I broke etiquette, I'm quite new to this and am still learning. Bobatherine (talk) 17:00, 30 April 2018 (UTC)

Hello @Bobatherine:, no problem at all. If you have any other questions, please feel free to ask me (WP:Teahouse is also a good forum, when you need advice about Wiki-editing). Best regards. GermanJoe (talk) 17:31, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
@Bobatherine: (re-ping, typo in 1st). GermanJoe (talk) 17:32, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
@GermanJoe: maybe you can guide me ... is this a sufficiently sourced/references and quality page? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Ben_Self This was one of the names I added in that list.
@Bobatherine: - this looks like a good start, but would benefit from 1-2 additional in-depth sources (it might or might not get through a review with only 3). Also, large parts of the draft have no immediate inline-references - where is the information in the 2nd-6th paragraph coming from? You should indicate the source of this information with additional inline-references directly after the verified statement(s). And if you want to re-use the same reference several times, you can create a so-called "named reference" (see WP:REFB#Same reference used more than once for more details). GermanJoe (talk) 17:54, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
@GermanJoe: okay, I think I get it ... let me clean this one up a bit and get back to you for some more feedback. I want to make sure it's up to appropriate standards. Also, I don't think I can publish right? Someone else has to?
@Bobatherine: when the draft is good to go, you can submit it for review by placing {{subst:submit}} (without the nowiki coding) on top of it. I just noticed the article talkpage message by the way (the ping didn't work): researching a complete article is indeed a lot of work, but there is no need to rush it. As long as you are working on a promising draft, it usually won't get deleted. Once submitted, an experienced AfC reviewer will take a look and give you additional feedback. One quick additional tip: consider splitting the article's main body in a few additional sections. The article's lead introduction (see MOS:LEAD) should only summarize the most notable points. Additional details should be put into sub-sections (for example "Early life and education", "Blue State Digital", "Personal life" just as suggestions). It's a relatively short article, so 2-3 sections would be enough to organize the content in a more accessible manner. GermanJoe (talk) 16:07, 1 May 2018 (UTC)
@GermanJoe: I have four BSD articles going now and here's one that I think seems reasonably well researched, referenced, and possibly ready to push through a more formal review process. Can I get your thoughts? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Tom_Cochran_(technologist) ... am I missing anything significant? These certainly are more work than the average person would guess!
@Bobatherine:, a minor issue I noticed in some sentences in these drafts is Wikipedia's requirement for a totally and completely uninvolved "point of view" in the narrative (WP:NPOV). To give you a quick example: "secure, stable and scalable" is a subjective assessment of quality, that is only based on the topic's own claim in an interview. Generally, such subjective assessments should be avoided. In rare cases where such an assessment is needed in encyclopedic context, it must be sourced to a truely independent expert source. Wikipedia articles should focus on objective facts reported by independent sources about the topic, not on what the topic or its representatives say or think about themselves. To be clear, most parts of these drafts are OK regarding their PoV. But I'd recommend to double-check any subjective claims or statements that may be seen as taking the topic's own PoV.
Secondly, and I was a bit hesitant to ask this: do you have any personal or professional connection to Blue State Digital? I certainly don't want to discourage any contributions, but if you have such a connection you should make sure to read WP:COI (and WP:PAID in case it applies). Editors with such a "conflict of interest" can contribute to Wikipedia via drafts and suggestions on article talkpages, but have to follow specific guidelines - most importantly such connections to the edited topic must be transparently disclosed (you'll find more details in the 2 linked guidelines). I do hope you don't mind the question to avoid future misunderstandings - I'll be glad to help with any other further questions and advice regardless. GermanJoe (talk) 11:45, 3 May 2018 (UTC)
@GermanJoe: Greetings! Thanks for those links, a lot to read in there. Having been a former Blue State Digital employee, I think that disqualifies me (or should) from adding to or creating any pages related to the company. I apologize, I should have read more guidelines and rules before wading into editing or creating any pages. I should just stick to topics where I don't or haven't had any direct connection. Looks like I should pause, put that disclosure into the talk page, and ask for uninvolved editors to review, edit, or delete the drafts? Bobatherine (talk) 17:57, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
@Bobatherine:, thank you for being transparent about this. If you are just a former employee with no current financial interest, you may be biased with certain aspects, but that's quite common for editors who write about topics where they have personal knowledge and history - I wouldn't call that a strong "conflict of interest" as defined by WP:COI (your drafts will be reviewed by other editors anyway). As a recommendation: you should briefly mention this fact on your userpage User:Bobatherine, so other editors are aware of it if need be. But in my opinion such a past connection doesn't preclude you from editing BSD-related articles. Just be careful to avoid PoV statements as mentioned in my first point above. GermanJoe (talk) 18:33, 4 May 2018 (UTC)

16:28, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CXLIV, May 2018

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 15:00, 12 May 2018 (UTC)

Hello, I am writting about my page BOŽIDAR DJURICA I have removed all questionable (or subjective) sentences. Van you please check if it is OK? Thanks NIko Osolni username niniosola Niniosola (talk) 14:34, 14 May 2018 (UTC)

Hello @Niniosola:, I have moved your message to my main user talkpage (/Tools is just a personal subpage to store some tools) - hope you don't mind. Thank you for removing most of the promotional content. But the article has another fundamental problem, the lack of truely independent reliable sources with in-depth coverage about the topic (see WP:GNG and WP:RS for more information). Passing mentions, self-published information and coverage in affiliated publications are not sufficient to establish a topic's "notability" (in Wikipedia's own sense of the term).
Also, just in case, do you have any connection to this author or his publisher? If you have, please make sure to read Wikipedia's "conflict of interest" guideline at WP:COI and disclose this connection as described in the linked text. Thank you for your consideration. If you have any more questions, I'd be glad to help. But it would probably be better to add AFD-related comments directly to the AFD page for this article (you can start such additional messages as Comment to avoid duplicate voting). The decision about deleting or keeping this article is up to all contributing editors in the AfD discussion and the closing administrator, not only me. GermanJoe (talk) 16:35, 14 May 2018 (UTC)

22:23, 14 May 2018 (UTC)

17:34, 21 May 2018 (UTC)

Thank you very much

The RfC discussion to eliminate portals was closed May 12, with the statement "There exists a strong consensus against deleting or even deprecating portals at this time." This was made possible because you and others came to the rescue. Thank you for speaking up.

By the way, the current issue of the Signpost features an article with interviews about the RfC and the Portals WikiProject.

I'd also like to let you know that the Portals WikiProject is working hard to make sure your support of portals was not in vain. Toward that end, we have been working diligently to innovate portals, while building, updating, upgrading, and maintaining them. The project has grown to 80 members so far, and has become a beehive of activity.

Our two main goals at this time are to automate portals (in terms of refreshing, rotating, and selecting content), and to develop a one-page model in order to make obsolete and eliminate most of the 150,000 subpages from the portal namespace by migrating their functions to the portal base pages, using technologies such as selective transclusion. Please feel free to join in on any of the many threads of development at the WikiProject's talk page, or just stop by to see how we are doing. If you have any questions about portals or portal development, that is the best place to ask them.

If you would like to keep abreast of developments on portals, keep in mind that the project's members receive updates on their talk pages. The updates are also posted here, for your convenience.

Again, we can't thank you enough for your support of portals, and we hope to make you proud of your decision. Sincerely,    — The Transhumanist   08:49, 25 May 2018 (UTC)

P.S.: if you reply to this message, please {{ping}} me. Thank you. -TT