User talk:GermanDude100

Nomination of Just Dance Wii 3 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Just Dance Wii 3 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Just Dance Wii 3 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wiiboy829 (talk • contribs) 22:32, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

December 2012

Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on User talk:Materialscientist. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. GSK ● ✉ ✓ 23:27, 19 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Kidz Bop

Do you have any sources that the three Kidz Bop CD's have 30 instead of 18 songs? If so, give those reliable, independent sources. I also like to know which stores sold the 30-song CD.s Otherwise, your edits will be seen as vandalism! Without proof, I will revert. The Banner talk 23:23, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I have proof. Have you even seen the Kidz Bop 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 commercials they say 30 TRACKS NOT 18. go here: [[1]]

Sorry, you don't. I was asking for independent and reliable sources. This is not a valid source at all. The Banner talk 23:53, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 00:17, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi GermanDude100, could you provide me the Amazon links that document the tracklists for the Kidz Bop compilations? Thanks in advance. --Cavarrone (talk) 21:39, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

To be clear

I have seen you have reverted my edits in Kidz Bop 1 and 4 without providing any source. To be clear, if you will keep on adding unsourced content without providing sources I will report you and you will probably be blocked. Search for the sources instead of edit warring! Consider this as the last warning. Thanks. Cavarrone (talk) 19:06, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'LL REPORT YOU FOR LYING!! THE TRACKS ARE REAL! I can't find a source, beaucse Kidz Bop doesn't advertise them anymore but YouTube has them I uploaded them:

Has some:

Unwell (from Kidz Bop 5) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FR0MYYQOL-s

Swing Swing Swing http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ncwtYnTT0IQ

Waiting for Tonight http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oNRxiuGpgxw

I Miss You http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0WfL3_0XMSI

If I could upload a 30 second audio sample or something. BUT I can't find another source so go and report me cause I'll report you if you keep changing it. Do you even know anyway about Kidz Bop at all?

ANI notice

See Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#User:GermanDude100. --Cavarrone (talk) 19:35, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

April 2013

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at WP:AIV. Your edits have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. GSK ● ✉ ✓ 20:37, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 days for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

Please take this time to familiarize yourself with how Wikipedia works. Claiming that you're right because you know something is not the proper way to build an encyclopedia. We need independent sources with facts that have been reported elsewhere. And what is more important, stay calm and don't attack other editors that have reverted you. De728631 (talk) 20:50, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

WHERE THE HELL do you get off blocking me?? I have references and facts about the Kidz Bop I tired of everyone deleting my changes. The tracks are real because I have them go here: http://shop.kidzbop.com/product.aspx?productid=46&categoryid=0&productcode=MS1153

You've been referred to WP:RS and asked for reliable sources multiple times, and you continued to edit war. Sorry. gwickwire^talk_editing 23:16, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Well I just talked to the Wikipedia I will be unblocked soon. — Preceding unsigned comment added by GermanDude100 (talk • contribs)

Yes, because I'm sure the Wikimedia Foundation (or whoever you're talking about) will trust a regular user over an administrator and your editing history. Wait your block out. Three days is not long. Then when your block does expire, start editing constructively. --GSK ● ✉ ✓ 15:08, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You've apparently sent an e-mail to our WP:OTRS team, and when someone reviews it they'll send you an e-mail back (if you've not already gotten one). However, I can pretty much say that you won't be unblocked until you stop your tirade and give us some reliable sources. Otherwise, as you've been told before, we can't include the information. That's not me, that's policy. gwickwire^talk_editing 17:28, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Just to clarify to GermanDude100, yes, you did contact OTRS and we did reply to your message, however we have no control over what happens in Wikipedia, and as I mentioned, these types of issues (content disputes or blocks) are not handled through OTRS at all. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 20:43, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Pac-Man and the Ghostly Adventures, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. All info about the future of a TV show requires references. Geraldo Perez (talk) 20:46, 10 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, GermanDude100. You have new messages at Geraldo Perez's talk page.
Message added 21:15, 10 April 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Geraldo Perez (talk) 21:15, 10 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Kidz Bop (album). This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. YouTube videos and Craigslist posts are not reliable sources. GSK ● ✉ ✓ 21:41, 10 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of one week for continuing your previous edit war here without citing your reliable sources in the article. This is a final warning from my side: please familiarise yourself with the appropriate ways of citing sources, and distinguishing between reliable sources and unreliable ones. For that matter, Youtube clips and online shops are not reliable and can't be used as a source. When you return from your block, seek discussion with other editors at the article's talk page, not at individual user talks, so a broad community may contribute in this dispute. Should you continue down one-way lane of "I am right", you will be blocked for a long time if not indefinitely. You may be right about the KidzBop releases, but so far your actions have been far from convincing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. De728631 (talk) 13:57, 11 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your use of multiple Wikipedia accounts

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/GermanDude100, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

We'll have the full story... at 11! 14:30, 11 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

August 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to The Awesomes may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s and 1 "<>"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

|company = [[Broadway Video]]<[[Sethmaker Shoemeyers Productions]]<br>[[Bento Box Entertainment]]
* Perfect Man (voiced by [Josh Meyers]]) - An arrogant man who thinks he's perfect. His personality is similar to [[Booster Gold]].

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:36, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Just Dance Wii 2 may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

* A "(3)" indicates that the song was originally on ''[[Just Dance 3]]''Experience]]''.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 05:32, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]