Jump to content

User talk:Geriv98

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]
Hello Geriv98! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! XLinkBot (talk) 03:39, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

April 2021

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Vanessa Beeley has been reverted.
Your edit here to Vanessa Beeley was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links in references which are discouraged per our reliable sources guideline. The reference(s) you added or changed (https://thegrayzone.com/2021/04/07/bbc-white-helmets-mayday-uk-intelligence//) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 03:39, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Oshwah. I noticed that in this edit to Vanessa Beeley, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 03:42, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Vanessa Beeley. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. SunDawn (talk) 03:45, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in the Syrian Civil War and ISIL. Due to past disruption in this topic area, the community has enacted a more stringent set of rules. Any administrator may impose sanctions—such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks—on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on these sanctions. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

— Newslinger talk 12:29, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

1RR page restriction on Vanessa Beeley

[edit]

Hi Geriv98, please note that the Vanessa Beeley article is under the one-revert rule (1RR), which prohibits any editor from making more than one revert on the article in a 24-hour period. Additionally, "The rule is not an entitlement to revert a page a specific number of times" and reverts that do not violate the 1RR are still considered edit warring if they are done repeatedly without consensus on the article talk page.

All articles related to the Syrian Civil War and ISIL are currently under this page restriction. The Vanessa Beeley article had not been properly tagged with this restriction, but I have amended this; you will now see a warning about the 1RR restriction above the editing window and at the top of the talk page. In the future, please be sure to avoid making more than one revert on an article under 1RR within a 24-hour period. Thanks. — Newslinger talk 12:38, 24 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Geriv98, you are invited to the Teahouse!

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hi Geriv98! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Lectonar (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 24 April 2021 (UTC)