User talk:Gerald Ryder

Welcome!

Hello, Gerald Ryder, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially what you did for Criticism of Jehovah's Witnesses. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! RockMagnetist (talk) 21:44, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Orwellian World of Jehovah's Witnesses

The article The Orwellian World of Jehovah's Witnesses has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable book

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jeffro77 (talk) 07:57, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Gary Botting, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Black Book (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:05, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Gary Botting, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Franco, Dambuster and Doug Christie (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:05, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Overlinking

Please see WP:OVERLINK. One Garry Botting link in the Criticism of Jehovah's Witnesses article is sufficient. BlackCab (talk) 08:41, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Botting

I realise I've been editing over the top of you a bit. I tend to edit articles based on recent changes in my watch list, but it's not usually right at the same time. Sorry about that. I'll lay off for a while.--Jeffro77 (talk) 08:35, 26 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Adam Scott Collegiate and Vocational Institute, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Evening News (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:34, 26 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sources

Please see Talk:Gary Botting#Sources and respond there if you have any concerns or questions. Thanks.--Jeffro77 (talk) 03:09, 27 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please also read Wikipedia:Citation overkill. It would also help if you could be a little more collaborative in your editing by communicating on the article's talk page.--Jeffro77 (talk) 03:22, 28 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Message

Hello, Gerald Ryder. You have new messages at Jeffro77's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Discussion at Talk:Wicca#Moved from article

You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Wicca#Moved from article. We're discussing your content additions. —Sowlos 11:35, 24 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

April 2013

Hello, I'm Sowlos. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Wicca because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks!
Your <ref> didn't actually cite any work. (You may be interested to read WP:CITE.) Also, you seem to be adding as many references to the Bottings and Lysbeth Turner as you can in your edits. This looks a bit like POV motivated editing. (See WP:NPOV.) Perhaps we should establish clearer conventions for notable persons at Talk:Wicca.

I hope you don't feel that I and others are over-scrutinizing your edits. Articles like Wicca are prone to over-editing by new editors who have a million things from their personal experiences they want to add. While Wikipedia aims to cover the sum of human knowledge, there is a proper place and tone for everything. For instance, if we mentioned everything to be said about a topic in its lead, the lead (which should be a summary) becomes something of a duplicate of the article it leads. Similarly, if we discuss everything relevant to a large topic in its main article because it's the most visible, the page essentially becomes multiple articles in one. Since Wicca's WP:GA status is currently under reassessment and several editors are attempting to clean up the article and save it from demotion, perhaps you could contribute to that process by highlighting ways in which the article may currently be deficient in leading readers to other more focused Wicca realated articles. —Sowlos 19:17, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Coven Celeste, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Assiniboine (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:43, 7 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notability concerns

What is your association with Gary Botting and the subjects of various associated articles of which you seem to be the creator and primary editor? Many of the details in some of those articles are quite trivial, and the tone of several is that of a 'memoir' rather than encyclopedic articles. Some of the articles do not have any sources focussing on the actual subject of the article at all (though some provide ancillary citations only to aspects not directly related to the subject.) Some also cite other Wikipedia articles as sources, which is against policy.--Jeffro77 (talk) 09:08, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Lysbeth Turner

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Lysbeth Turner, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. The page has been nominated for deletion, in accordance with Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. TKK ^{bark !} 12:36, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Gary Botting, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lakeland College. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:49, 2 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:59, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Gerald Ryder. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Gary Botting, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gerald Gardner. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:13, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Gerald Ryder. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Gerald Ryder. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]