User talk:Gerald.Howard

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Gerald.Howard, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! Cornell Rockey 13:22, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:RNG Gaming.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:RNG Gaming.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 17:09, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:RNG_Gaming.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:RNG_Gaming.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 12:29, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

removal of cleanup tags from RNG Gaming

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent contribution removed content from RNG Gaming. Please be more careful when editing articles and do not remove content from Wikipedia without a good reason, which should be specified in the edit summary. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Cornell Rockey 13:22, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

RNG Gaming

Until that article is linked to in more than 2 or 3 articles, that linkless article template should remain. Please do not remove it. Thank you. Cornell Rockey 14:18, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Unfortunately, an article you recently created, Get21, doesn't conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new articles so it will shortly be removed, if it hasn't been already. Please use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do and please read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. Kafziel ^Talk 16:09, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

RNG Gaming and Get21

Please review this Wikipedia:Walled garden and WP:Notability. Also, please do not remove content cleanup tags until the problems are resolved. Cornell Rockey 17:14, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to ignore our policies by introducing inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, you will be blocked. Kafziel ^Talk 17:18, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Kafziel- Look for your response please

As Get21 is the first company that provide this new blackjack tournaments to the world wide, I beleive that we must tell the people of the world the whole story about it along with the game srtucture and all the content that can help the people to learn and practice this new kind of application.

Please explain to me what am I doing wrong that you keep deleting my information? What should I do in order to spread the blackjack tournaments to the world? How come partygaming, bodog, pokerstars, playtech and many many others can do it and I can't?

Please write me ASAP.

Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a way for you to "spread blackjack tournaments to the world". That's what advertising is for. There are tons of other sites on the Internet where you can buy ad space.

Wikipedia is also not an instruction manual. If you want people to learn how to use your site, put instructions on your site.

I can't speak for those other articles. It could be that they meet our requirements. But even if they don't, I'm not concerned with them at the moment, and comparing your article to theirs is not a valid argument. Two wrongs do not make a right. It's obvious that you have a conflict of interest here, and you need to stop creating these article or you will be blocked. Kafziel ^Talk 13:10, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

RNG Gaming being linkless

Currently, one other article likes to RNG Gaming. If you can't demonstrate that company's notability, I'm going to send it to an article for deletion. Also, remember to sign your posts on talk pages by using 4 ~s. Thanks Cornell Rockey 13:42, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've deleted that article as blatant advertising for the same reasons stated in my explanation above. No assertion of notability was presented, it was blatant advertising, and a clear conflict of interest. Kafziel ^Talk 13:45, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank for your explantion, I fixed it and I believe thtat now it is just fine.

Gerald.Howard ^Talk 17:45, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright issue with Get21

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Get21, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.newswiretoday.com/news/9939/. As a copyright violation, Get21 appears to qualify for speedy deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Get21 has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. For text material, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source, provided that it is credible.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GFDL, you can comment to that effect on Talk:Get21. If the article or image has already been deleted, but you have a proper release, you can reenter the content at Get21, after describing the release on the talk page. However, for text content, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Kon-Tiki001 15:39, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Get21 Reads like an advertisement, copied from press release

A tag has been placed on Get21, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group or service and which would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Kon-Tiki001 15:39, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

Due to your repeated recreation of unacceptable spam articles despite several warnings and explanations, I have temporarily blocked you from editing. You may return when the block expires, but if you create another spam article I will block you indefinitely. Persistent spammers will have their sites blacklisted. Kafziel ^Talk 16:25, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WHY AREN'T YOU EXPLAIN TO ME WHAT SHOULD I DO IN ORDER TO INSERT GET21 TERM

I am pretty sure that the term is objective,

COULD YOU PLEASE DIRECT ME WAHT TO CHANGE?

Gerald.Howard ^Talk 16:25, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I already explained the situation to you here. There is nothing you can do to make those articles acceptable. If you create them again after your block expires, you will be blocked indefinitely without further warning. Kafziel ^Talk 16:35, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]