User talk:Georgy90

Personal computer

Georgy, the image that you want to use is too dark. Can’t see anything but the screen. If you want to make an image, use plenty of light. —Stephen (talk) 14:42, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Image pushing

Please stop your persistent replacement of existing images with ones you've taken yourself. A lot of your images are of much lower quality than the ones you are replacing, and in cases of articles like this, you are outright damaging them.

I am also seeing edits from IPs like 213.149.165.247 and 87.228.229.206 that look like it is you behind them. Please ease up before this becomes an issue - Amog | ^{Talk • contribs} 15:44, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bad photos

G, I'm removing most or all of the photos that you are adding, because they are awful. If you could learn how to use a camera to focus properly, and hold it still, and maybe use better lighting and less cluttered backgrounds, you might be able to make some photos that would succeed at illustrating the topic, but it's hard to imagine what motivates you to go the trouble of uploading such awful shots. Tell us. Dicklyon (talk) 19:47, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I notice in your metadata (one sampled HTC phone image that's better than most) that you're shooting 1/30 sec, f/2.8, ISO 800. At 1/30 second, you'll often get motion blur from hand shake. At f/2.8, you'll have very shallow depth of field, so a lot of blur on 3D and tilted 2D objects. At ISO 800, your images will be noisy. You need more light. Ambient indoor lighting makes it hard to get good shots. Go outdoors or by a window, or use a sensible flash setup. Or take a photography class. Dicklyon (talk) 19:52, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

More bad photos

Hi Georgy. I strongly suggest that you stop adding your images to Wikipedia's articles. They are being repeatedly removed by other editors because of their poor quality. I see you have been warned about this quite a few times, so it is possible that you will be blocked from editing if you persist in this disruptive behavior. Gnome de plume (talk) 19:10, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'd also like to warn you again, same as Amog above, about edit warring using IP addresses to restore your images after someone else removes them. This is considered sock puppetry and is also likely to result in you being blocked from editing if you persist. Gnome de plume (talk) 19:19, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Windows Mobile addition to Smartphone

I'm more than happy to see an Android phone at the top (in fact that would be better), but Windows Mobile isn't representative, its marketshare is far too small and its not revolutionary either. Windows Mobile 6.5 is widely regarded by the tech press and others as being a very poor phone OS. -- Eraserhead1 <talk> 19:14, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

And Windows Phone 7 may well be very good, but it isn't anywhere near as popular as Android or iPhone. -- Eraserhead1 <talk> 19:51, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

February 2011

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to upload inappropriate images, as you did at Laptop, you may be blocked from editing. This 'inappropriate images" warning probably isn't really a fit for this situation, but please stop pushing your lousy photos into articles where better images are available. Dicklyon (talk) 00:41, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Photo of Laptop

If you want to improve the photo, I suggest

1. back away and use a moderate telephoto. Your photo looks like it was taken up close with a wide angle lens and shows geometric distortion.
2. remove any brand or modal information in the caption.
3. choose a laptop that maufactured in the last 12 months.

To replace an existing picture, you need to provide a significantly better picture.

Also, why replace the existing pictuure? You could just add a picture.Constant314 (talk) 13:50, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bad photos

Please stop posting your poor quality photos. You are just wasting your time and energy. --Kristoferb (talk) 03:31, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

G, your new laptop photo is indeed an improvement. However, recall what I advised you on my talk page: "On the laptop, no, it's not for you to decide, since you have a conflict of interest. Use the article talk page as I suggested." If you had offered the new photo on Talk:Laptop, and some other editor had liked it, it would probably be in now. But pushing it yourself was a bad idea, so you lost your chance again. As the taker and owner of the photo, you should recuse yourself from any decision about whether it is preferred. Dicklyon (talk) 05:06, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Need for Madness.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Need for Madness.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 17:41, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Personal Computer.JPG

Thanks for uploading File:Personal Computer.JPG. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 21:05, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Laptop.JPG

Thanks for uploading File:Laptop.JPG. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 21:06, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You don't simply post pictures of memes on Wikipedia

Here's why I hid your picture of the memes of 9GAG.

The pic is of bad quality.
You put your name on it.
Such pics are not really useful. It might be useful to post each of the memes, in its original form, on Wikimedia Commons, tag them accordingly and then create a gallery on an article which talks about memes, not about 9GAG, because memes did not originate on 9GAG, as you well know.

I, as a fellow 9gagger, warmly advise you to be more responsible when editing Wikipedia, because some people judge editors harshly. Just take a look on the talk page of 9GAG. -- Petru Dimitriu (talk) 19:13, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Man, understand

Check the three reasons I gave you above for not keeping the pic on the page! Ask any other experienced editor, and he'll tell you the same! Memes have not originated on 9GAG!!!!! If your pic was relevant, it would be relevant to have pictures of eyes in the article about dogs becuase dogs have two eyes!! Wikipedia is not your playground! Just take a look on the talk page at the guy who criticised us for making a hash out of articles which should be encyclopedic! I invite you to understand this and remove the pic yourself. Faster! -- Petru Dimitriu (talk) 21:12, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Rage faces

Please post on Talk:Rage comic explaining your rationale before you re-add your self-promoting meme collection image to that article. Thanks. – Pnm (talk) 16:27, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Memes.gif

Thanks for uploading File:Memes.gif. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 17:05, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Memes.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Memes.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sreejith K (talk) 08:21, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Windows Store.png listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Windows Store.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Codename Lisa (talk) 12:47, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Windows 8 Login Screen.png listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Windows 8 Login Screen.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Codename Lisa (talk) 12:52, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Task Manager.png listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Task Manager.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Codename Lisa (talk) 12:56, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Windows Store.png)

Thanks for uploading File:Windows Store.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:22, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Task Manager.png)

Thanks for uploading File:Task Manager.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:22, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Windows 8 Login Screen.png)

Thanks for uploading File:Windows 8 Login Screen.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:23, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Iro Katsantoni

Please do not make articles about a living person that are entirely negative in tone and unsourced. Wikipedia has a policy of verifiability and any negative information we use must be reliably sourced, and our articles must be balanced. Negative unreferenced biographies of living people are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images in violation of our biographies of living persons policy will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. AllyD (talk) 18:56, 20 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Datsun Go, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Japanese and Three-cylinder engine (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:00, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Bad photos

I admire your enthusiasm for adding photos to Wikipedia but I think you need to use some judgment as well. For instance, on 7 August 2013 in the Nissan Sunny article, you replaced a perfectly fine photo of a nice, clean Datsun 1200 with a picture of a derelict 1200 sunk to its axles in the dirt with a tree covering half of the photo. Stepho talk 22:52, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Just stop adding your own photos

You have been repeatedly asked not to replace existing photos with your own photos, because the existing photos are better. You've repeatedly ignored the request.

I noticed your change to Austin Maestro. You replaced an informative photo of a (perhaps unrepresentatively) shiny Maestro with one of the rear view of a distinctly used Maestro full of cardboard boxes. The change from shiny (even glamorous) Maestro to worn, unglamorous Maestro is fine with me. The problem is, your photo shows nothing much beyond the fact that the rear window is large.

If your photos are better than the existing photos, and you draw the attention of other editors to your photos, then these other editors will replace the existing photos with your photos. If by contrast it's you who has to replace them, chances are that the changes aren't worthwhile.

So stop replacing existing photos with your photos. If you'd like to draw others' attention to new, good photos by yourself, do so on the talk page of the relevant article. -- Hoary (talk) 02:23, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have alerted WikiProject Automobiles to your edits and Deletion requests/File:Datsun GO.jpg|requested deletion of Datsun GO.jpg. You may wish to add your opinion to either or both.

In view of your editing pattern -- and particularly the article that you created about somebody who visited Russia forty years before she was born and whose "husbant [sic] . . . died from extensive masturbation" a century previously -- I have difficulty taking you seriously. But perhaps other editors will be more indulgent. -- Hoary (talk) 03:52, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:24, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please attribute or claim media you uploaded or restored: File:Personal Computer.JPG

You uploaded or restored , File:Personal Computer.JPG, but for various reasons did not add an {{information}} block, or indicate your (user) name on the file description page. Media uploaded to Wikipedia needs information on the SPECIFIC authorship and source of files, to ensure that it complies with copyright laws in various jurisdictions.

If it's entirely your own work:
please include {{own}} in the relevant source field, amend the {{information}} added by a third party, ensuring that your user name (or name you want used for attribution) is clear in the author field, and change the license to an appropriate "self" variant (if such a license is not already used). You should also add an |author= parameter to the license tag, to assist reviews and image patrollers.

When you have copmpleted the above steps:

If the {{media by uploader}} tag is present please add, a |claimed=yes parameter to the tag.
If the {{img-unclaimed}} tag is present, please change it to {{img-claimed}}

to indicate that you've accepted the given the license shown, and updated the file description page appropriately.

If it's not entirely your own work, or the media is based on the work of others:
Please update the source and authorship fields, so that they accurately reflect the source and authors of the original work(s), as well as the derivative you created. You should also not use a "self" license unless the work is entirely you own. Media that is incorrectly claimed as self or {{own}}, will eventually be listed at Files for Discussion or deleted, unless it's full status is entirely clear to other contributors, reviewers and image patrollers. You should also read Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission which details how to confirm any permissions you obtained for works by others that are still in copyright.

Whilst this notification, relates to a single media upload, it would also be appreciated if you could ensure that appropriate attribution exists for other media you uploaded, You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If media is not claimed, and there's no other obvious source or authorship information, the file may have to be removed for copyright reasons.

It's okay to remove or strike messages like this once the concerns have been addressed. :). 16:07, 31 October 2018 (UTC)ShakespeareFan00 (talk)

File:Personal Computer.JPG listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Personal Computer.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Ixfd64 (talk) 23:15, 8 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]