User talk:Georgiehijam

December 2023

Hello, I'm Philipnelson99. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Samaton—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Philipnelson99 (talk) 21:44, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Philipnelson99 This is a fiction Georgiehijam (talk) 21:46, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Philipnelson99 There's nothing criticism about the matter, I am editing the information because it was faje, and I am contributing facts Georgiehijam (talk) 14:52, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

January 2024

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Euryalus (talk) 05:01, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Further to the above: a review of your edits shows an unacceptable level of vandalism (examples [1] [2] [3]), apparently deliberate reductions in article quality (example [4]) and inaccurate labelling of edits (examples [5] [6]. Your disruptive edits (including this particularly offensive one, are interspersed with a few reasonable contributions. Unfortunately your overall edit history is presently a net negative and suggests you aren't that interested in contributing accurate and well-sourced material to the encyclopedia. Hence the block to prevent further disruption.

As is often the case with blocks like this, the duration is indefinite but not infinite - if you wish to return to editing you may post an unblock request outlining your understanding of policies on disruptive editing and vandalism and why you should be given a second chance to follow them. This request will be reviewed by an independent administrator, who may choose to unblock the account or to leave it blocked. Regards --Euryalus (talk) 05:13, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Euryalus unblock me Georgiehijam (talk) 13:13, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There are unblock instructions in the template and the message above. -- Euryalus (talk) 21:23, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Euryalus I don't find any instructions Georgiehijam (talk) 04:14, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

These instructions: If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. In addition also note my comments above about vandalism and other disruptive editing. Unblock requests are reviewed by a different administrator, so it's up to you to convince whoever they are that there is merit in your appeal. -- Euryalus (talk) 04:46, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Euryalus But who wrote those articles? they are not authentic. have you surveyed, or researched? Why do you enter it on biased political propaganda? Georgiehijam (talk) 14:15, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]