User talk:Georgeof1001

Welcome!

Hello, Georgeof1001! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Peaceray (talk) 21:45, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Contributing to Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article The five pillars of Wikipedia • Simplified ruleset How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions Directories and indexes Where to: ask questions • make requests Tip of the day Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style (Simplified) • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists The Signpost (Wikipedia's newspaper)
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

March 2020

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, such as at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Sexology and sexuality, (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment, or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. Peaceray (talk) 21:47, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cake and Cunnilingus Day (February 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails WP:GNG, requires significant coverage from multiple <reliable> independent secondary sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Georgeof1001/Cake and Cunnilingus Day and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Georgeof1001/Cake and Cunnilingus Day, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 04:35, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Georgeof1001! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 04:35, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Georgeof1001/Cake and Cunnilingus Day

Hi, I got your email, but I prefer to talk about articles on-wiki.

I'm at a loss to know what to do with this draft. In an ideal world, there'd be coverage in BBC News, The Guardian and The Independent, and I'd use those sources to expand the article and pass it for review. But I can't find any reasonable English sources, and a search anything else brings up either blogs, porn sites or just generally undesirable material I don't want to go anywhere near. I appreciate there are foreign-language sources, but I'm just not really up to speed on what's reliable and what isn't outside the major broadsheets like Le Monde and Der Spiegel.

The only other possible person I can think of asking is SoWhy, who is multilingual and good at article rescue (I recall once he rewrote Micaela Schäfer into an acceptable state after I complained it was an unsalvageable mess), and while I can't imagine it's the sort of article he'd normally get involved with, hopefully he can see that the event is done out of a genuine respect for women's rights. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 22:48, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Ritchie333: (pinged) Not sure why this was declined, the sourcing looks quite good, at least those I can understand:

Jolie is a lifestyle magazine akin to Cosmopolitan which I would consider reliable for such subjects (it was at one time led by journalist de:Anja Delastik who went on to lead the German iteration of Cosmopolitan).
news.de is a newsportal which according to the de-wiki article has a full journalistic staff which usually indicates that a source is reliable. The article in question was created by a "Voluntärin" (which roughly translates as "intern")
Stern is a weekly magazine similar to Der Spiegel or Focus. Their stories are often flashier than those of the other two (cf. We've had abortions!) but it is generally reliable (the Hitler Diaries fiasco notwithstanding)
The Schwarzwälder Bote is a major regional newspaper that exists since 1835. It's generally as reliable as similar English-speaking newspapers
il Fatto Quotidiano is an Italian newspaper led by Marco Travaglio. I see no reason to question its reliability.

All in all these sources alone are imho sufficiently reliable to establish notability and I cannot imagine any article with these kinds of sources being deleted at AFD had it been created in mainspace. Courtesy pinging reviewer Dan arndt. Regards So Why 09:43, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page watcher) sounds good. Why not just move it into main space and let AfD test the weight of the evidence? ——Serial 10:28, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cake and Cunnilingus Day has been accepted

Cake and Cunnilingus Day, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 10:23, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Cake and Cunnilingus Day

On 1 April 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Cake and Cunnilingus Day, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that 14 April is Cake and Cunnilingus Day? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Cake and Cunnilingus Day. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Cake and Cunnilingus Day), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (ie, 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 00:02, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Valentine's day and Cake and Cunnilingus Day

I want to thank you for your contribution to the Cake and Cunnilingus day article SoWhy, Storye book, Ritchie333 I still think that the article is related to Valentine's day for sure. Shouldn't we create a link on Valentine's day for C&C day? I am not sure how to do that Georgeof1001 (talk) 15:18, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you have a reliable source making the connection, we can consider adding a link. Regards So Why 15:42, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Georgeof1001. You are welcome. Storye book (talk) 16:03, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@SoWhy But.. aren't most if not all the links above explain this connection? Isn't this in fact what C&C day and S&B day is all about,and the reason why S&B day is already as a link on Valentine's day article? Georgeof1001 (talk) 15:48, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]