User talk:GeorgeKelsey

Hello, GeorgeKelsey! Welcome to Wikipedia! We're so glad you're here! If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or

or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills, the sandbox is for you. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing!

— Mikhailov Kusserow (talk) 04:12, 25 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: edit a page • upload and use images
Getting help
Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and guidelines
Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The community
Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Writing articles
Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Pages needing attention • Peer review
Miscellaneous
User name • User pages • Talk pages Clean up: General - Spam - Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Al Lutz. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. 151.151.73.171 (talk) 18:43, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have info about how Doritos concept AND NAME really originated. (Hint: my uncles last name is Dority). I don’t know if anyone cares, but it’s interesting how these stories get told. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2001:5B0:2648:2C78:1C5:2354:39E:8BCD (talk) 22:24, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

MedCab Case

Regarding this MedCab case i suggest you request a third opinion or a reuest for commentfirst. Hope you have some luck solving this dispute. Seddon69 (talk) 23:25, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Al Lutz. Wordstock (talk) 13:25, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Al Lutz

I tried to help with the Al Lutz disagreement by leaving a third opinion, but a third opinion is just that and nothing more. If the opinion does not help you reach consensus mediation is your next step and I see that you have initiated that process.

The purpose of mediation is to work toward a consensus among the editors of an article. If you really believe that your section should be included you will need to make your case and work towards a consensus. If consensus cannot be reached, you could consider arbitration, but arbitration won't be considered unless you make a real effort to reach a consensus.

The reason I tell you this is that I think you need to understand that constantly reverting an article without making the effort to support your case is not serving your cause. If you think your section belongs in the article, then you must actively push for a consensus. At this point, your earlier request has been closed and the information archived, so you will have to go to Wikipedia:Mediation_Cabal/Cases/2008-04-01_Al_Lutz and finish filling out the new request if you want your case to move forward. Feel free to use the wording from your earlier request at Wikipedia:Mediation_Cabal/Cases/2008-03-20_Al_Lutz. Good luck. Mmyotis (talk) 19:18, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

April 2012

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Disneyland. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Both of you need to stop reverting each other's work and go to the talk page. I know there are issues with this date, but reverting constantly isn't going to solve it. -- McDoob AU 93 02:55, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 02:49, 10 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]