User talk:George998

February 2017

Hello, I'm Oshwah. I noticed that in this edit to Iowa 80, you removed all the content without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, I restored the page's content. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 00:27, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not blank pages, as you did with this edit to Love's Travel Stops & Country Stores, because it is considered vandalism; instead, use the sandbox for testing. If you think the page should be deleted, see here for what to do. Thank you. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 00:29, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Mifter (talk) 00:32, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

George998 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The block was not necessary. I obeyed the last warning that was given. And there was no edits made since then. So please I'm asking nicely unblock

Decline reason:

No. —DoRD (talk) 02:44, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This vandal is a serial sockpuppeteer who has edited under numerous other accounts, for a recent example see Special:Contributions/Tina324. Sro23 (talk) 01:19, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]