User talk:Geoff Plourde/Archive 9
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:Geoff Plourde. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 5 | ← | Archive 7 | Archive 8 | Archive 9 | Archive 10 | Archive 11 | → | Archive 15 |
hello, i need to ask help :)
hello, i hope you can help me.
a discussion was archivied without resolving it, in fact the issue was in debate and someone cleared the page archiving it.
tha archived page is (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Alexander_the_Great/Archive12#Alexander_the_Great.2C_an_ancient_greek_king_of_macedon.3F)
the new page is the current talk page of the article "alexander the great" (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Alexander_the_Great)
maybe the current page is similar for the argument, but not at all, because in this way i can't begin the steps for dispute resolution.
thankyou for the attention, PelasgicMoon (talk) 05:35, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
Sources needed for Frank P. Belotti
Your recent contribution(s) to the Wikipedia article Frank P. Belotti are very much appreciated. However, you did not provide references or sources for your information. Keeping Wikipedia accurate and verifiable is very important, and as you might be aware there is currently a drive to improve the quality of Wikipedia by encouraging editors to cite the sources they used when adding content. If sources are left unreferenced, it may count as original research, which is not allowed. Can you provide in the article specific references to any books, articles, websites or other reliable sources that will allow people to verify the content in the article? You can use a citation method listed at How to cite sources. Thanks! • Gene93k (talk) 17:25, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
Edit summary
Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary. Thank you. :) -- Quiddity (talk) 02:56, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
User:Thedagomar/Academy
I saw this while browsing through new userpages (looking for blatant advertising, offensive text etc). May I ask; is it a proposal, and if so is it active? it looks like an interesting idea and i'd be willing to look over and comment on it. Ironholds 22:56, 17 June 2008 (UTC)