User talk:Geoff Plourde/Archive 21
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:Geoff Plourde. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 15 | ← | Archive 19 | Archive 20 | Archive 21 | Archive 22 | Archive 23 | → | Archive 25 |
Roman knights
Hi. I've expanded equestrian order to include info on the Roman Republicann cavalry: equipment, tactics and campaign record. Although this article has been submitted for GA review (I don't know who by), I think it should be rated for A-class. I would be grateful if you would read it through again and tell me whether you could support it for A-grade. Thanks and regards EraNavigator (talk) 17:20, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
Quackwatch on WP:RFAR
Can you link tothe evidence provided against Quackwatch in that case? I can't find any that would support your revised FoF. Shoemaker's Holiday (talk) 20:10, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/Piotrus_2 is renamed Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Eastern European disputes by motion.
For the Arbitration Committee, - Penwhale | Blast him / Follow his steps 10:18, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
WP:MOTD
Please see Wikipedia_talk:Motto_of_the_day/Nominations#Running_dry Simply south not SS, sorry 18:30, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
Happy Birthday!
|
The Wikipedia Birthday Committee wishes you a very happy birthday! Enjoy your special day. |
wwesockssign 05:45, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
Re: Disambig
Hi, I have nothing to do with the challenge but one of two things probably happened. Either you were knocked out of the top ten (the whole list is here) or your edits were undone for some reason. Sorry J04n(talk page) 09:37, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
- It was JaGa's idea, not sure if she runs the reports or not. J04n(talk page) 15:43, 11 May 2009 (UTC)