User talk:GeoffCapp

Welcome!

Hello, GeoffCapp, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! -- Longhair | Talk 11:06, 31 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

List of Thelemites

Bennett was never a Thelemite. He was a Golden Dawn member and Crowley's mentor. He never professed to follow Thelema: He went to India, and became a Buddhist. Crowley tried to convert him to Thelema during a visit to India, but was rebuffed. Bennett had renounced western magick. Would you want to be called a member of a religion you never joined after you die? -999 05:20, 29 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

As for Kellner, Thelema is not the same as OTO and vice-versa. Kellner was never really even a founder of OTO, but simply an associate of Reuss' who he found it convenient to make part of the order's mythology. Thelema had not come into it at all at that time. You have to understand that Crowley made claims that various dead people were Thelemites. However, unless they themselves professed Thelema, they should not be on List of Thelemites, IMO. -999 05:23, 29 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, no. Bennett left for Asia in 1900 and not only became a Buddhist but had founded the World Buddhist Society by 1903, before Crowley received the Book of the Law. Crowley tried but fail to convert him later during a visit to India. (Crowley wrote that he was a traitor to the West because of this, or some such rubbish.) You may be thinking of Frank Bennett, the Australian that Crowley wrote Liber Samekh for... -999 05:33, 29 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

How do you want this?

Do you want me to remove the guys I put on the British blues page from the blues guitarists page? Clay4president 17:34, 13 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I would say anyone in Category:British blues musicians who is best/only known as a guitarist should be moved to Category:British blues guitarists. More to the point, no one should be listed in both categries; just one or the other. That said, I'm not entirely clear on what you're referring to when you say "the British blues page," so if that's not Category:British blues musicians, I'd appreciate it if you could provide a link. --Geoff Capp 12:23, 15 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have added several guitarists to British Blues Guitarists. I went through all the blues guitarists. Clay4president 03:42, 16 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thelema Category

Thanks for letting me know. Honestly, I'm not entirely sure how that happened. Must have been a mistake I made when I first starting editing. Thanks again. Regards. SynergeticMaggot 03:11, 18 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Film Music

G'day,

Just letting you know, there is a new WikiProject up and running; Wikipedia:WikiProject Film Music.

Alexbonaro 08:14, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cistercians Abbey in Wąchock

There is no fixed length for a stub (see this ). When I removed the templates I was going through a number of Polish Churches changing {{Poland-struct-stub}} to {{Poland-church-stub}}. When I am doing this I normally remove templates if the articles are much longer than others in the same area, I amguessing that most of the articles in that group where 1 small section and this one stood out as being longer. If you think the templates need readding I have no problem with that, it may be an idea though to have Poland-church-stub instead of the struct-stub and not have geo-stub as these are generally not used on buildings. Waacstats (talk) 13:23, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Trial of the Knights Templar

The research that I did was properly sited and if you have checked the source I gave you would find every word I cited. You would also find it includes some of the greatest historians who ever lived. Also the book is NOT IN COPYRIGHT. It is available on the Internet Archives.Mugginsx (talk) 09:40, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Rewording in same article as to the paragraph on the Chinon document

It is a contradiction of terms to state that the Pope did not believe the Templars were guilty and at the same time he "absolved" them. To absolve in the Catholic Church means to "forgive" the sin, not that the sin was never committed. Since virtually everyone was Catholic at the time, everyone knew the meaning of "absolution" in the Middle Ages.Mugginsx (talk) 10:26, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nyima Chophel

ངག་པ་ ཉི་མ་ ཆོས་འཕེལ་ http://www.thlib.org/reference/translation-tool/ —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.64.186.58 (talk) 07:38, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sacred Texts

Esoteric Teachings of the Tibetan Tantra of Migyur Dorje
Mahabharata English trans. by Kisari Mohan Ganguli with Sanskrit text and transliteration

Proposed deletion of Hallelujah (Deep Purple song)

The article Hallelujah (Deep Purple song) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Apparently non-notable song. No claim to notability, doesn't appear to have charted, only a single source.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Not your siblings' deletionist (talk) 08:14, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Matthew Barney, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vitrine (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:05, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

FTR, Vitrine is a hard redirect to Showcase, not a DAB. I think part of the problem is that the Showcase page can't quite make up its mind whether to be a DAB or a WP:DICTDEF. Nonetheless, it appears to me to be the right link for the use in question. --Geoff Capp (talk) 00:01, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, GeoffCapp. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Covenant Eyes.
Message added 16:19, 23 July 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Thanks! Unforgettableid (talk) 16:19, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Jack Parsons (rocket engineer)

Hi Geoff, thanks again for your improvement to Parsons' article. Myself and User:Midnightblueowl have been working for a while in an effort to get the article featured after attaining GA status. You evidently have a degree of knowledge in the subject of Thelema and occult biographies so it would certainly be appreciated if you were to provide further input and improvements. JJARichardson (talk) 14:50, 17 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Humphrey Mackworth article

Thanks for your comments. I see your point too. It's just a holding revision at the moment. The underlying problem here is that Mackworth senior is much more important than his relative obscurity suggests - the victim really of being a considerable Parliamentarian and revolutionary in a county that has always been pretty conservative and royalist. This means that only a few historians with a real interest in the other side (Johnstone, Gaunt, Coulton) have given him his due. I took on the job without realising just how well he typifies the conflicts and issues of the period and consequently had to keep restructuring the coverage as I went along. There is actually a lot more in the State Papers, as he was apparently omnicompetent. The ecclesiastical material was originally one large chunk and read better, with the references supporting it more closely. I'll give it a more thorough revision one my next visit. I'm hoping to put together a family tree for the Mackworths soon but was hoping to give Thomas a bit of attention before going back to his dad in detail. I'm also hoping to reduce some of the circumstantial material by improving other linked articles, e.g. on Chidley, Blake and other Puritan clergy and activists. Sjwells53 (talk) 09:02, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:07, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, GeoffCapp. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, GeoffCapp. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, GeoffCapp. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

IP overreach unblock request

This user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

GeoffCapp (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

127.0.0.1 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "I am your lord and saviour". The reason given for I am your lord and saviour's block is: "Sock puppetry".

Blocking administrator: ‪Laser brain‬ (talk • blocks)

Accept reason: You should be good to go now! Yamla (talk) 15:45, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:05, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Surf Canyon

The article Surf Canyon has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence this company passes WP:GNG/WP:NCOMPANY. No in-depth coverage, just mentions in passing, press releases and their rewrites.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 06:54, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:17, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:02, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]