Jump to content

User talk:Geodejerry

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome

[edit]

Welcome...

Hello, Geodejerry, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like this place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Linguisticgeek

Again, welcome! LinguisticGeek 06:29, 7 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Help request

[edit]

Hi, I made a trivial edit on the 'Nudibranch' page, 5 March 2014, and then it was reversed 12 minutes later by an editor. My change was changing a verb to plural to agree with the plural subject. The editor in reverting claimed it was a singular subject. Maybe I'm out of date, I learned grammar in 1940's & 1950's, and believe that if an 'and' appears in the subject phrase, that means two things are being discussed, which makes a plural subject. But I notice in commercial print, this rule is often violated, maybe by assuming the two things are in fact just one thing. It just irks me! I didn't re-make my edit, getting in a fight over such a trivial thing is unseemly. Do you have any words of wisdom? Thanks, Jerry Geodejerry (talk) 05:02, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You were right but the text was poorly written. Hopefully, I've now fixed it. Cheers,  Philg88 talk 07:08, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, again, I made a change that will almost certainly be reversed, not least because I unthinkingly made it in the wrong space. The change was to introduce in the "milpa" article a different take on the origin of the town name "Milpitas". This change should have been made, if at all, in the "Milpitas, California" page. But I'm not quite sure, still being a neophyte editor, what to do to move the change to the correct page; and maybe also flag it as something requiring the oversight of an editor with more experience. I will appreciate any help here...(Geodejerry (talk) 17:03, 6 September 2022 (UTC))[reply]

I've reverted your edit at Milpa. In general, when you add something like that to Wikipedia, you need to include a citation to a reliable source. That's because everything needs to be verifiable. See WP:V and WP:RS. GA-RT-22 (talk) 17:26, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Got it. I knew that! I am often unaware of where my information comes from. I'll search around, and if I find a source, I'll get back to you about how to write my reference.
Thanks for your help...Jerry Geodejerry (talk) 12:34, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:19, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:06, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]