User talk:Geocacher301

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. It appears you have not followed this policy at I Kissed Dating Goodbye. Please always observe our core policies. Thank you. --Mschel 21:04, 25 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss your changes to I Kissed Dating Goodbye before redoing them. Thank you. --Mark (Mschel) 15:58, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss your changes to Sovereign Grace Ministries before redoing them. Timothy6 20 (talk) 00:09, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sovereign Grace Ministries

I have deleted your last edit here. Even though it was source I find (as a non-partisan observer) that it crossed the rule that Wikipedia should be written from a neutral point of view. Whateve you think that you are "led to believe" should be left out of articles. Please talk with me if you disagree. Cheers,  Berg _{Drop a Line ޗ pls} 19:56, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

As you are a party regarding this article, I would ask that you give a statement here. I am attempting some informal mediation, and I would ask that all parties be civil. The page has been fully protected for one week, in an attempt to solve this dispute. You can also post a message on my talk page. Regards, Steve Crossin (talk) 21:48, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have twice placed a block of wp:original research into this article. Please don't do that. The article is contentious, and flagged. Unsourced content may simply be removed.
Please include text in your own words, based on content published by wp:Reliable sources, and cite those sources as appropriate so that other editors and readers can wp:verify the content.
Most especially, please refrain completely from removing wp:article tags, as they let readers and editors alike know where the article needs work, or where an editor is concerned.- sinneed (talk) 18:54, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Mediation

Just a note, I have made a recommendation on the Sovereign Grace talk page, I recommend you review it. Please, I must stress, my recommendation is not binding, only the Arbitration Committee can make binding decisions. That said, I have done my best to make a fair recommendation, and I would like you to review this, and give your comments below my statement. Thanks again, Steve Crossin (talk) 23:58, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Joshua Harris

I had actually already listened to that sermon several times before we even had the discussion. I'm not conceding the argument, I just really do not want to spend the energy arguing about it. -- Jwinters | Talk 19:44, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

1) To clarify, he has addressed problems in his church. In the sermon which you referred me to, he talks about it. 2) I did not say it's not worth the energy. I said that I did not want to spend the energy. The reason I don't want to spend the energy is because I am much busier now than I was several months ago and just about every one of the 168 hours God gives me every week are spoken for. As a result, arguing on wikipedia over what Joshua Harris intended, or over what he wrote or spoke about, is just not a priority in my life. There are things one the Internet that I disagree with, people's opinions that I disagree with, and I cannot expect to change every one of them. I don't mean in any way to insult you or to imply that I am somehow better than you, because I'm not. I just believe at this point that continuing to argue would be futile, since both of our minds seem to be set on this matter. -- Jwinters | Talk 17:59, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have already said that I'm not going to continue the discussion of this. It is not because there is no answer, I just know it's futile to argue over this. Please stop sending me messages regarding this. -- Jwinters | Talk 02:34, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]