User talk:Genre Crusher

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet of a banned or blocked user. Blocked or banned users are not allowed to edit Wikipedia; if you are banned, all edits under this account may be reverted.

Details of how to appeal a block can be found at: Wikipedia:Appealing a block.

Genres

If you're going to play around with, or defecate genres, at least learn the correct way to format them, here. Also, it is best to use reliable sources, as you'll find users are very protective of their genres. It's easier to get your way if you have a couple of notable publications (Billboard, Rolling Stone, NY Times, etc) supporting your argument. Cheers. k-i-a-c (hitmeup - the past) 11:52, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, if you continue to capitalize genres and musical roles (guitar, vocals, etc.), your edits will continue to be reverted. Tim meh ! 20:06, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, this is becoming borderline vandalism. You have been told that your edits go against policy, yet you continue to revert others' edits, restoring the incorrect format and genres, without explanation. Please stop; your edits are not helping Wikipedia and are only hindering its development. Tim meh ! 21:27, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

March 2009

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for disruptive editing. Please use the time you are blocked to read up on some of our guidelines and policies. When you start editing again, please engage in discussion with other editors rather than ignoring them and reverting their edits.. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Mfield (Oi!) 21:30, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Genre Crusher (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

IM NOT AFI-PUNK I DONT KNOW WHO THE HELL HE IS SO STOP SAYING IM HIM! UNLESS U CAN SHOW PROOF THAT IM HIM THEN THERE IS NO REASON FOR WHY I SHOULD BE INDEFED. THIS BLOCK IS COMPLETELY UNJUSTIFIED. MAYBE I DESERVE 24 HOURS FOR EDIT WARRING, BUT NOT AN INDEF WHEN THERE IS NO REAL PROOF THAT IM HIM.

Decline reason:

Screaming will not get you any extra attention. In reviewing your edits, I conclude that your entire edit history has been disruptive and tendentious editing over music genres, including edit warring and incivility. At that point I stopped investigating: I don't know who AFI-PUNK even is, and it doesn't matter: your own editing justifies an indefinite block, and this response makes it clear you think you've done nothing wrong. Mango juice^talk 23:10, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Genre Crusher (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I did not say that I didn't do anything wrong. I admitted to edit warring with others over music genres, so saying that I think I did nothing wrong is a false statement. What I am denying is suspicion of sockpuppetry, as there is little solid proof that connects me with this AFI-PUNK guy. Yes, I do deserve a 24 hour block for edit warring, but I don't deserve an indef yet, as there is not enough proof that I'm the same guy. Checkuser me if you wish, as I doubt I'm using the same Internet service as AFI-PUNK.

Decline reason:

Your obvious familiarity with Wikipedia terms and policies indicates that you are clearly not a new user; based on that alone it seems clear that this account was created by an established user merely to be disruptive. Such uses of an account are NOT allowed, so you will remain blocked indefinately. Jayron32.talk.contribs 02:01, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Goodbye, Sorry It Had to End this Way

{{helpme}}Alright this is getting sickening, I give up. AFI-PUNK says goodbye forever and will never edit Wikipedia destructively again. He also is sorry for all of the trouble he has caused over the past couple of years, and wishes that other editors (most notably Hoponpop69, Seraphim, MastCell, BrendelSignature, AngelOfSadness, TheLetterM, Salaskan, Zzuuzz and Timmeh to name a few) will see this and forgive him for his actions. Once again, goodbye and good riddance.