User talk:GenkiNeko

I noticed you were new, and wanted to share some links I thought useful:

For more information click here. You can sign your name by typing 4 tildes, like this: ~~~~.

I noticed something on your user page that could be done more efficiently. Instead of mentioning all languages you know and how well you know them in a separate paragraph, you could also use the Wikipedia:Babel function. In your case, you'd need this code, I think. Fyrius 16:03, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Babel

en

This user is a native speaker of the English language.

la-4

Hic usor simile nativi latine loquitur atque contribuere potest.

fr-2

Cet utilisateur peut contribuer avec un niveau intermédiaire en français.

ja-2

この利用者は中級の日本語ができます。

Search user languages

Latin Wikiquote (Vicicitatio)

Hello! I see you have tagged yourelf with a {{la-4}} template. Would you like to help us by translating into latin any of the official polices or help pages of Wikipedia? —Argentino (talk/cont.) 20:57, 9 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hapkido

The user from IP 211.131.245.114 has made some edits that bring up the question of Hapkido's origins. These edits seem to say that Hapkido is "exported aikido", which might be controversial. I have heard that there is some connection with Daito-ryu, but that it is not clearly documented.

I suggest reverting to "the Korean art called Hapkido", because it is a Korean art. However, 211.131.245.114 may have a point: perhaps we should add a sentence about its probable Japanese origins.

Thoughts? --GenkiNeko 15:56, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hapukido has not received correct succession of Takeda Sokaku. Therefore, I think that I should remove the description concerning Hapukido. Daito-ryu aiki-jujutsu is thought to be one of the roots of Aikido. However, Hapukido doesn't influence Aikido at all. These two Marshall arts should not be equally treated. --211.131.245.114 16:42, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps it is not a "correct" continuation of Daito-ryu, if by "correct" you mean "complete". However, the Hapkido page includes, under "Choi Yong Sul", an interview with Kishhomaru Ueshiba that indicates there is at least some connection. (Sidenote: the correct term is "martial" arts, not "marshall".)

I suggest a new version with the following points, if we can agree on them:

Hapkido is not a "style of aikido"; it is a separate martial art
Hapkido appears to have some Daito-ryu influence (cite interview with Kisshomaru Ueshiba)
Hapkido is spelled with the same kanji/hanja, suggesting it considers itself related (perhaps cite a Hapkido page describing its history to show self-identification)

--GenkiNeko 16:57, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The page of Hapukido was confirmed. The relation between Hapukido and Aikido is being controverted. (The Hapukido organization of South Korea denies Japan to influence now. Hapukido is traditional original Marshall arts of Korea. [1])To prevent various misunderstandings, will we delete Hapukido?　Hapukido is not necessary always information in Aikido. --211.131.245.114 18:13, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You could also add yourself to the [[Category:Wikipedian aikidoka|Your name]]. Thanks for your contributions.Peter Rehse 00:56, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

How do I do that, again?

Aikido has been submitted to FAC. Lets take it that final mile.Peter Rehse 00:56, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Jun - the owner of aikiweb has privately said that if there are any pictures in the aikiweb gallery that the Aikido article could use I should let him know. I think we are looking for action shots that clearly show technique and look good at the same time. Could you take a look and let ME know of any that strike your fancy and then I will give him a list early next week.Peter Rehse 00:56, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Try looking here for some Hapkido history info. They seem to have a legitimate reputation and proper historical content of some sort. Http://www.hapkiyoosool.com —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hapkiyoosool (talk • contribs) 17:00, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

genkineko

just wondering, do you actually do aikido and/or speak japanese?Wwilson 1 00:14, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nah. I just put that ja-1 entry on my language box to screw with people. As for aikido, I just copy and paste random blocks of text from aikiweb. Nobody's noticed so far. --GenkiNeko 03:33, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

i figured as much. either that, or you are being sarcastic here, which just makes you come off as an egotistical asshole.Wwilson 1 11:26, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Try looking here for some Hapkido history info. They seem to have a legitimate reputation and proper historical content of some sort. Http://www.hapkiyoosool.com

Could you help me write this article?

Hello,

I was wondering if you would be willing to help me write either Seikichi_Iha or Shorin-ryu_Shido-kan. Tkjazzer 21:48, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Aikido

Hi I just resubmitted the Aikido article for Featured article status. Appreciate it, based on your previous help, if you could take a look.Peter Rehse 08:23, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Now I really need help. Got a vandal.Peter Rehse 13:24, 12 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:Hdr-ration.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Hdr-ration.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 7 days after this notification, per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rette tast 08:57, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Lesbian Health Concerns

Do you agree to the compromise edit?Chrisrus (talk) 15:14, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited MOBA (genre), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page RTS (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:10, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dota (genre)

Dotaveteran has reverted all your edits, so I restored most of the content, but tweaked things of my own here and there, because the article is in desperate need of a cleanup. We have gathered consensus, so I would say that we are close to being ready for a rename for the page. I've previously issued a rename, however, so we might want somebody else to initiate this. DarthBotto_talk•cont 04:56, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Sorry, I was away a while. I posted on the Talk page. This is really silly. I'm just going to change it.--GenkiNeko (talk) 20:11, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Not like I have homework I should be doing or anything... (lol) --GenkiNeko (talk) 20:11, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, the page has been renamed to Action real-time strategy and seems to have been fully-implemented into Wikipedia without too much controversy. However, it is facing resistance from Dotaveteran, who has reverted a ton of edits since the move and is trying to move to page back to Dota (genre). You should post your opinion on this matter in the renaming discussion at the bottom of the page. DarthBotto_talk•cont 20:15, 07 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:52, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Donn F. Draeger, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Terry Dobson. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:40, 12 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, GenkiNeko. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, GenkiNeko. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

RfC at Robert E. Lee

As a recent contributor to Talk:Robert E. Lee, you are receiving this notice for an RfC at of a proposed restatement of a wp:primary source which contains more points than the existing block quote from the letter. The primary source is a 1856 letter of Lee’s to his wife from Texas as found at Alexander Long, Memoirs of Robert E. Lee: his military and personal history (1886), p. 82-83. Opponents have seen wp:original research in the proposal as drawing conclusions not found in the primary source. A rewrite of the first proposal follows an edit break. TheVirginiaHistorian (talk) 08:49, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of That's How the Story Ends

The article That's How the Story Ends has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No references, no claim of notability, fails WP:NSONG and WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Richhoncho (talk) 11:47, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]