User talk:Geniussansom
Welcome!
[edit]You never got a welcome so here it is along with other usefull stuff.
|
deletion
[edit]where has evrything gone, why did you delete it?
It was greg that wrote the above ^. noface1. look on history.
are you online still, send me a message if you are Thatperson 13:02, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
i havent seen you online in a while, have you seen what i did to the page banbury? i also made a bretch hill page and i also updated my userpage a lot, (just like i see you did) i also ordered a pyraminx yesterday off of amazon
how many cats do you have? 18 year old !?! do you give it life enhancing vitamins or something lol
just a few babel's there Paul ! ! ! ! !
hi G, your on late, what have you done to the template? my new minx came but its not very good see ya homie
Banbury wards
[edit]Yes i will fill aswell, as i was sayingt o NF , we should move all banbury articles to banbury extension articles for example there title should be
Easington, Banbury rather than just Easington incase it confuses people if you do that ill change all the banbury links to them
never mind ill do the extensions you change the links
Grimsbury, Banbury on the main Banbury page if you dont mind and also Hardwick, Banbury
will be back soon noface1
Ive done all the warding (look at the template) ill be off in 7 minutes for simpsons and maybe dinner but ill be back at 6:30 look at the banbury discussion page, they rated it as a 'start' article, weve got to get it upto B standard i think it should be already but nevermind, ill begin doing more wards artciles soon, i think we should add a recreation sub-section into each wards article, also look how the southampton team has organised thier wards section :) see ya soon Thatperson
are you still on ? if so we should continue with the local regions.
what to get BANBURY to a b grade i thought it would already be there !?! i just feel that having them in a list is clearer and more informative so thats why i did it!
ok will, do thtaperson's gone for today hasn't he. yes i've found the same problem.
new subject
[edit]im on until 10 how long you on for, my template is almost complete, ill add coledge fields now
i might make a ward map over the weekend like th southampton one, rc or newpage patrolling?
Thats it now. my tempalte and every banbury ward article is complete. im going now so i wont see you tell tomorrow, leave what time you will be on tomorrow so i can see tomorrow morning, see ya home dog :)
forgot to tell you i got back on 30 mins ago, im goin in 5 though, what else should we do to improve the banbury article?
well done we did well last night and completed our mission and more can you go on sunday morning about 10:30. if yes say on my talk page. all ban ward articles complete plus all red links :) ! some ward things are difficult because it can be disputed as to whether there in that estaate or not as there is no ofiicial boundary. need to do more work on the individuasl estates! see you again soon, bye. Noface1.
Hello,
Thank you for your stub submission. You may wish to note that it is preferable to use a stub template from Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting/Stub types instead of using simply {{stub}}, if you can.
Thanks! --Vox Causa 22:20, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
Thank you for the advice. Geniussansom
|
Football (soccer) barnstar | |
| This award goes to you for your outstanding dedication and work on the local Football pages. It has not gone unnoticed. Noface1 11:52, 21 December 2006 (UTC) |
Speedy nomination for Nextar gps
[edit]Hi! I saw that you tagged Nextar gps with the generic {{db}} template. I just wanted to let you know that I changed it to a more specific template. I also saw that you wanted to change it to "db-advertising" which doesn't exist. The proper shortcut for blatant adverts is {{db-spam}}, for your reference. Anyway, keep up the good work ^_^ —Keakealani 20:50, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for the advice. I had looked for an advertising template but couldn't find one. I will use this one in future. Geniussansom
Merry Christmas!
[edit]found this so Merry christmas -
Dear Geniussansom,
Love came to a stable on that very special night to bring us out of darkness into His glorious light. May Jesus touch your life with gladness and warm your heart with love as we celebrate His birth. I hope you have a Blessed Christmas, User:Noface1 06:12, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
Datakit
[edit]When you tag stub articles like Datakit, please try to find the best specific stub tag on the page WP:STUBS. This saves other editors work in categorizing the page, and makes it easier for editors with experise in the subject to find pages that need work. Thanks, — Swpb talk contribs 21:41, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
Hi, I usually try to categorise the stubs but I was unsure of what template to use, and could not remember the page with the templates on.
is that how you spell genius i thought it was genious hiya when will you be on
ok thanks see you later Noface1 13:54, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
see you happy editing, go banbury
hi thanks for the message of good will see you soon byeNoface1 16:15, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
hi im almost thereNoface1 17:20, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
well done on making that templaet on southampton areas, did you do the categoriing trick :)
Rugby table
[edit]yes sure but get rid of the bold on leicester and change the bold to northampton when you put it on there. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Noface1 (talk • contribs) 16:39, 19 January 2007 (UTC).
Someone has put a Speedy Deelete tag on your Banbury United F.C. article. I put a hang-on tag on it, but would be useful if you could add to the debate on its talk page. Best Regards, - Trident13 16:03, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
- Thank you for the message concerning the possible deletion of the Banbury United article. I agree that the article is worthy and that it is poorly written. I plan to re-write much of it in the next few dates. You may have noticed that JJGD who put it up for deletion, as put many articles up for deletion recently. He is a friend of mine and I believe that this may be an attempt to reduce my edit count. I will discuss this with JJGD tonight. --geniussansom 17:13, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
- Hey, no problem! I think the subject is worthy of an article under the required criteria, and you clearly have put a lot of effort into it - its more of a" work in progress" than a poorly written article. Good Luck! Rgds, - Trident13 17:16, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
I'm about 400 edits in front of you why would I try and bring your edit count down? I was reading the notability standards for football and the Banbury united article meets very few of them, for example the average attendance for a team should be around 1000, but under the player records headline near the bottom of the page it states that the average league attendance is 415.
Noface1 gives you a "Thumbs Up" personal user award for your contributions to Banbury United, the southern league article and Northampton Saints.
good on you mate !
experienced the same problem and thought the same thing lol.
your msgbox didnt work for some reason, speedcubing in the Uk has been deleted, wasnt that silly for the banbury united deletion tag, anyway i suppsoe i better go and get a few more mainspace edits before my rfa (those speedcubing edits being deleted didnt help :( ) Thatperson 20:50, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
i think we should work on banburyshire next (where would you define the boundary?) im on msn if you wanna catch me
Barnstar
[edit]
|
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar | |
| For your excellent work on making and improving many non league football articles. Well done. Noface1 12:16, 21 January 2007 (UTC) |
championship
[edit]they've alredy got the table for this league - [1] sorry. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Noface1 (talk • contribs) 18:32, 21 January 2007 (UTC).
it now redirects to the actual page. but you need to take that off your user page. p.s good northern league article :)
yeah ok ill do it then also some stubs maybe Thatperson 16:44, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
Football squad templates
[edit]Hi,
Noticed that you added a squad box to Mark Ovendale. Just in case you don't know (apologies if you do), you can write a template for the squad and then just place the template on each players page, rather than having to paste the whole list everytime. See Category:English_football_squad_templates for examples. Hope this is useful WikiGull 20:11, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
- Just noticed that you have created the template. You just need to put the template short-cut on each page, not the template text. See what I've done to Darren Garner for an example. Good work though! WikiGull 20:15, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
Non-League footballers category
[edit]Hi, I've proposed the category you created for deletion. In my view if contributes nothing useful to wikipedia - there are plenty of categories for players (by nationality, clubs played for etc) which are much more useful. Furthermore, the category is unclear as to whether you mean current non-league players or just any player who happens to have ever played non-league football in his life (which will be a lot!). WikiGull 08:53, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
userbox
[edit]cool userbox did you make it ?? see you tommorow Noface1 21:28, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
good work g keep it up
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Recyclenow, by JJGD (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Recyclenow fits the criteria for speedy deletion for the following reason:
1. Only 1 proper edit - made on the 10th of may.
2.Unreferenced
3.Nobody is adding to it.
4.Not Important.
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Recyclenow, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 21:20, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
TfD nomination of Template:Southampton districts and suburbs
[edit]Template:Southampton districts and suburbs has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Waggers (talk) 11:24, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
Banbury United - Hitchin Town
[edit]This may be - in fact almost certainly is - too late to ask, but then I just woke up. Was just wondering if you were going to this match today. Myself being from Hitchin, I'm planning on being there myself. Maybe we'll come across each other? Falastur2 (talk) 12:29, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Stuart Bridges
[edit]
An article that you have been involved in editing, Stuart Bridges, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stuart Bridges. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Eddie6705 (talk) 00:45, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Ollie Stanbridge
[edit]An article that you have been involved in editing, Ollie Stanbridge, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ollie Stanbridge. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Eddie6705 (talk) 00:46, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Harriers Ground Primary School, Banbury
[edit]
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Harriers Ground Primary School, Banbury, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. JoshuaD1991 (talk) 16:48, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Hardwick School, Banbury
[edit]A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Hardwick School, Banbury, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. JoshuaD1991 (talk) 17:00, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Hanwell Fields
[edit]A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Hanwell Fields, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. JoshuaD1991 (talk) 17:24, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of College Fields
[edit]A proposed deletion template has been added to the article College Fields, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. JoshuaD1991 (talk) 17:29, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of Template:Newport County A.F.C. Current Squad
[edit]
A tag has been placed on Template:Newport County A.F.C. Current Squad, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on [[Talk:Template:Newport County A.F.C. Current Squad|the article's talk page]] explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.
For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Dzhugashvili (talk) 15:49, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of Template:Banbury United F.C. Current Squad
[edit]A tag has been placed on Template:Banbury United F.C. Current Squad, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on [[Talk:Template:Banbury United F.C. Current Squad|the article's talk page]] explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.
For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Dzhugashvili (talk) 15:49, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Robin Faccenda
[edit]The article Robin Faccenda has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Unsourced BLP about a possibly non-notable person.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TheoloJ (talk) 18:27, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Faccenda Group
[edit]The article Faccenda Group has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Doesn't appear to be notable, no sources to confer notability.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TheoloJ (talk) 18:28, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:Banbury United F.C. squad
[edit]Template:Banbury United F.C. squad has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. EchetusXe 20:53, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
New Page Patrol survey
[edit] New page patrol – Survey Invitation Hello Geniussansom! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.
Please click HERE to take part. You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey |
You are invited to the first ever Oxford Wiki Meetup which will take place at The Four Candles, 51 George Street, Oxford, OX1 2BE on Sunday 4 November 2012 from 1.00 pm.
I hope as many people as possible will be able to attend so that we can make this a regular event. If you have never been to one, this is an opportunity to meet other Wikipedians in an informal atmosphere for Wiki and non-Wiki related chat and for beer or food if you like. Experienced and new contributors are all welcome. This event is definitely not restricted just to discussion of Oxford related topics. Bring your laptop if you like and use the free Wifi or just bring yourself. Even better, bring a friend! Click the link for full details. Looking forward to seeing you. Philafrenzy (talk) 10:17, 25 September 2012 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:00, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
New deal for page patrollers
[edit]Hi Geniussansom,
In order to better control the quality of new pages, keep out the spam, and welcome the genuine newbies, the current system we introduced in 2011 is being updated and improved. The documentation and tutorials have also been revised and given a facelift. Most importantly a new user group New Page Reviewer has been created.
Under the new rule, you may find that you are temporarily unable to mark new pages as reviewed. However, this is nothing to worry about - most current experienced patrollers are being accorded the the new right without the need to apply, and if you have significant previous experience of patrolling new pages, we strongly encourage you to apply for the new right as soon as possible - we need all the help we can get, and we are now providing a dynamic, supportive environment for your work.
Find out more about this exiting new user right now at New Page Reviewers and be sure to read the new tutorial before applying. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:29, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!