User talk:Geniescience

helmets / bicycle: i'll start a rebuild by rewriting from scratch. The article can grow. The article does not need to be long. People can add a little more to it. I submit to the crowd that my rewrite is a balanced beginning. I encourage everyone to add small sections that they can justify. Everyone's goal is to keep it clear and concise. There is no need to add the same content that is already available in another article, so please refrain from doing that.

Attempting to rewrite it from its current position would require 100 hours to read all the references. Those who know the references are best suited to add some of them back into the article.

preceding text presumably added by Geniescience.

May I suggest that you get consensus for such a drastic pruning before doing the pruning; also consider doing it in smaller stages with discussion at each stage. As an example of rewriting an article, I'm well on the way to almost a complete rewrite of Bicycle gearing, but have done it in small stages over a period of several months with lots of added references Murray Langton (talk) 18:11, 2 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The "white elephant in the room" is not present in your case of bicycle gearing. If I describe the white elephant in any one way or another, it may cause anger and difficulty. I hope that this is clear.

preceding text presumably added by Geniescience.

Please sign your posts, even on your own talk page, so other editors can see who said what and when. I note that you appear to have breached the '3 reverts in 24 hours rule', and that at least four different editors disagree with your actions. Murray Langton (talk) 21:51, 2 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:17, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi from Wikimania

Hi, Eran (talk) 17:26, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Geniescience. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]