User talk:Genieofmusic

I'm happy!

RE: List of best-selling music artists

Yes, infact also other sources claims over 13 million copies worldwide. With every probability, PR added that sale for to advertise Shakira, or from a vandalism of Wikipedia. Simone Jackson (talk) 13:22, 24 January 2010 (UTC)

Christina Aguilera sales

This source and information isn't mine, but from the LA Times, as I posted together as reference. They say 43 million albums and it's a reliable source. I just think they updated her sales and it's a valid information. User:Piranga (talk) 19:40, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

Billboard published the information that I posted. A lot of official websites from several artists published this information too (As Clay Aiken's official website, for example, that I used as a source). The first link I posted was from a blog, so I agree it could be removed, but the information was reported by Billboard Magazine at the best sellers (single)list of the last decade. User:Max Liron (talk) 20:01, 20 January 2010 (UTC)

Stripped sales

Sorry, but Rolling Stone magazine and Coca-Cola Dome (In pres-releases) report that Stripped sold 12 million worldwide. You say my sources aren't reliable but you used 'Fan Of Music' and 'Lyric System' as sources to say that Stripped sold 10 million, and these sources aren't reliable. (As you accused me of not using reliable sources) User:Max Liron (talk) 15:20, 20 January 2010 (UTC)

The source I used from Coca-Cola dome is from an official release! It was about Christina's concerts in association with Coca Cola. They say the first album (Christina Aguilera) sold 16 million, and in fact, these informations are 'official' once they worked with Christina's own staff. Billboard posted the album sales as 15 million worldwide (at the same time) in a section of answers. RCA released a E! Entertainmentt special/interview in 2008 that says Christina's debut album sold 16 million (As a lot of programs and notes). In 2000 the album had certifications for 13 million worldwide, and probaly they updated it for 16 in these last years. About Stripped, I understand your point. Stripped has been certificated for 9/10 million copies sold worldwide in 2003/2004. I know it, but then, in middle 2005/2006, it appeared in some press releases as 12 million copies sold, as the same Coca-Cola Dome press and in some credibly magazines and sites (as Rolling Stone). About Back To Basics, in 2008 RCA declared the album has sold at least (more than) 3.7 million copies. But they omitted a lot of certifications in these 3.7 (used minimal data). Then, some updated the sales for 4/4.3/4.5 copies. But there's another data I've always read as forgotten in these numbers. The asiatic and oriental sales of Back To Basics were huge and received many certifications (there), and I've never seen the updated data for it! That's why many people say Back To Basics sold (exactly/nearly/more/close) 5 million.

It's really so controversial and it causes a mess. Her sales always are questioned and as a fan (yes, I'm a fan) it's so boring, because if I have to choose some of these numbers I'll choose the possible maximum. Her total sales are so confused too, about 'albums' and 'records'! User:Max Liron (talk) 22:30, 20 January 2010 (UTC)

Christina Aguilera sources

Billboard never released on its official site the best single sellers decade-end charts. It was published in the magazine and then used in the Internet. The source was from an artist's official website, and it's a reliable source, or do you think they would create these informations? User:Piranga (talk) 17:30, 20 January 2010 (UTC)

The problem is that all of you aren't understanding it the right way (or don't want to accept). It isn't from the Hot 100 or general singles chart! It's about (only)SINGLES SALES! Physical sales. Christina is in #26 considering all the categories of measurement. She hasn't any single from an album outside the Top 50. I'm not creating this, as I said Billboard published it! Madonna is the first in this category and her performance in the general singles chart is different too! This information is in Billboard Magazine and many sites around. Check it before clearing this edition and warn the people, because the source used is more reliable than a lot of you and the others use. Christina is the second 'best seller singles artist' of the last decade. User:Piranga (talk) 22:56, 20 January 2010 (UTC)

/* Charts */ WP:BADCHARTS

Please do not add the United World Chart, or any other chart listed at WP:BADCHARTS, to any Wikipedia articles. Thank you.—Kww(talk) 23:47, 9 February 2010 (UTC)

List of best-selling albums worldwide

Why would you even think of removing Laundry Service. I have started a thread at st of best-selling albums worldwide. Thanks, Tbhotch (talk) 21:25, 10 February 2010 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing.

Do NOT Remove "Laundry Service" from List of best-selling albums worldwide until discussion is over, Thanks Tbhotch^{Talk2 Me} 18:49, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

Please show me your sources from Laundry Service, you *remember* that Shakira's official website (due to contradiction), badcharts, blogs and fansites are not valid, thank you Tbhotch^{Talk2 Me} 19:29, 13 February 2010 (UTC)

I told you shakira bio is in this moment trivial, because the web page contradict itself, another page beside bmi? Tbhotch^{Talk2 Me} 20:33, 13 February 2010 (UTC)

for me there's no problem with uwc or either "bad chart", but the problem is Eminem - The Marshall Mathers LP, the album didn't sold over 22 million copies and santana - supernatural sold over 16 million copies Tbhotch^{Talk2 Me} 21:13, 13 February 2010 (UTC)

---

I gave you a week and you never show me your "unlimited" sources, the only 3 you showed were:

a) shakira un-uploaded page b) bmi (the most reliable source you have) c) a page who say santana's album supernatural sold only 16'000,000

stop vandalize the page, please. Tbhotch^{Talk2 Me} 03:56, 21 February 2010 (UTC)

---

a) since February 13th I stop "vandalize" the reverting your non-vandalize

b) i ask your unlimited sources (again), but you never showed them, and repeat, you showed:

1) shakira un-uploaded page

2) bmi (the most reliable source you have)

3) a page who say santana's album supernatural sold only 16'000,000

c) whenever anyone revert your edits, I'll show you Template messages you want them or not. Tbhotch^{Talk2 Me} 17:58, 21 February 2010 (UTC)

---

excuse me, are you blind??

shakira un-uploaded official page does not mention, not even by mistake, She Wolf, Oral Fixation Tour, 07/07/07 concert or either recent event in Shakira's Life since 2006, so please stop cheating me with that trash; and I'm just waiting all your other pages Tbhotch^{Talk2 Me} 18:10, 21 February 2010 (UTC)

OK sorry

I'm sorry i didn't know about the mirrors thing..i won't use it again. But you are also lowering blackout sales to 2.5 million without sources, when the two sources say 3.1 million, and that is considered Vandalism... Please don't do it again without real sources, Thanks.--GenieOFbritney (talk) 01:25, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

The singles Collection sales

hi Genieofmusic, you lowered the sales of the singles collection by britney spears, also US sales, and the source say 125,000. you also lower sales to 400,000. Can I ask you why? sales two months ago were 400,000. Now sales are of 500,000. we have to resolve this problem, because i upgrade them and you lower them...if you want i can give you sales from each country, and WW, sales stand of over 500,000. would you like this sales, so we can make realistic information? because 400,000 is very low...please answer, and thanks:) --GenieOFbritney (talk) 15:54, 3 March 2010 (UTC)

Christina Aguilera discography

This edit summary [1] is not appreciated. I was not randomly removing things from the article just for the fun of it or vandalising anything — as I stated in my summaries, these tallies have been removed from many different discography articles, not just this one. Discography pages are lists of releases by an artist — not a showcase of how many hits they may have. Speaking of edit summaries, your history shows that you almost never leave one. I'd suggest getting into this habit so that others know what you are doing. You can even change your preferences (Click "My preferences" and go to "Editing" tab) so that Wikipedia will always prompt/remind you to add a summary before saving any page. - eo (talk) 00:52, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

re:

christmas albums are considerd studio albums (according to users), & are spansih albums, for example shakira, so have to go one one page, though i dont agrre in holiday albums as studio, i guess they are, if not is there a way you can help me, editing hilary duff's discohgraphy in where a user inssites that they are, tahnxAlxknight (talk) 01:54, 10 March 2010 (UTC) but with mi reflejo she has four studio albums plus one comimng uo Alxknight (talk) 01:54, 10 March 2010 (UTC) thanx

Bionic

Hello! could you please stop adding "Keeps Getting Better:A Decade..." to the chronology of the infobox of the article?? Wikipedia:Albums clearly states that only studio albums should be listed in the infobox! that means that "Back to Basics" is her last studio album! "Keeps Getting..." is a greatest hits album! I have already said this before and reverted your edits , please take a look before editing! thanx!! :-) MariAna_MiMi (Talk) 20:20, 28 March 2010 (UTC)

April 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Wikipedia. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.Candyo32 (talk) 15:23, 17 April 2010 (UTC)

What is with you and deleting charts from Not Myself Tonight? I have warned you about this several times. Please go over WP:BADCHARTS, WP:GOODCHARTS, and WP:USCHART again! Candyo32 (talk) 01:40, 23 April 2010 (UTC)

Well next time, please review recent chart history before you remove. Candyo32 (talk) 01:48, 23 April 2010 (UTC)

Britney Spears articles protected

Petergriffin9901, Genieofmusic, GenieOFbritney: In light of the recent edit-warring, most Britney Spears articles are now at full protection for one week. The three of you need to go to a talk page, argue this issue out, and settle it. The edit warring must stop. If any of you fail to discuss the issue and proceed to edit war after the protection is lifted, you can expect blocking editors to be my next step.—Kww(talk) 22:58, 23 April 2010 (UTC)

Well Genieofmusic...

We need to stop this... I'm writing this to tell you that I'm sorry for attacking you and undoing your edits, maybe I was wrong, maybe not...but still we have to make peaces... But we need to clear up things first.

Britney.com sales biography was updated in late 2007, before Blackout came out, and it only counts the sales of the Certifications...For example, In the Zone, which it says it sold 6 million, in the US. certification it only counts 2 million, because it is 2x platinum...while its real sales are 3 million by now...that one is just an example, as there are more of this wrong facts there, this means that In the Zone sales are from 7 million to 10 million, and all her albums sales would increase if they counted actual sales...that's why britneyspears.com said this year that Baby one more time sold 25 million copies... Maybe we can put the sales from britney.com, but saying that they are only sales from the certifications? what do you think about that? I hope we discuss this and we can have an arrangement soon:) My regards, --GenieOFbritney (talk) 23:42, 23 April 2010 (UTC)

I am here to as well try and reason with you Genieofmusic, however my approach and methods are a bit different than GenieOFbritney. First of all I need you to understand that BS Weekly is not Britney Spears official site, it seems to be a blog/fansite. There is no proof or indication that it is a real or reliable extension of her management team or label. On the other hand, LiveNation is an official music/ticket sales site, that is now one of he largest and most trusted concert ticket sites that exist. While you may not agree with the sales, you must remember something which I as well learned this way, Wikipedia runs on reliability not truth.

Besides for this issue, I would like for you to explain to me something. I'm not here to point fingers or anything of the sort, but 'm trying to understand your reasoning. You seem to trust BS Weekly and side by it's sales, this being so please answer my question. On the page Britney you reverted my edit and changed the sales from 12 Million (LiveNation), and instead of changing it to 9 Million (BS Weekly), you changed it to 6 Million which contradicts both mine and your source. Unless it was a mistake, that's blatant vandalism for no reason. I'm willing to just accept it might have been an error, but I'd like your input on the matter.--PeterGriffin • Talk 21:39, 25 April 2010 (UTC)

Infobox at My Kind of Christmas

There is a reason editors have been inserting "studio" as the album TYPE in the infobox at Xtina's My Kind of Christmas. This field is for categorization at the Wikipedia Albums project and each album appears in to-do lists based on the category in that field. For precise details, see the list Category:Album articles with non-standard infoboxes. The album article will continue to appear in this report, and attract the attention of editors, because "Christmas" is not an official TYPE according to Wikipedia precedent. That field should say "studio" because that's what the album really is. The fact that it's a Christmas album is extremely obvious in the article text. Insisting that the field say "Christmas" is nothing but a cosmetic argument that makes the whole article stick out line a sore thumb with editors who are trying to make the best of all album article at Wikipedia. DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 00:59, 2 May 2010 (UTC)

May 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. I notice that you removed content from Not Myself Tonight. However, Wikipedia is not censored to remove content that might be considered objectionable. Please do not remove or censor information that is relevant to the article. You have the option to configure Wikipedia to hide images that you may find offensive. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. There was no reason for your removal of content from the intro. Lil-unique1 (talk) 00:47, 14 May 2010 (UTC)

not that it matters now cause you're blocked.Lil-unique1 (talk) 00:48, 14 May 2010 (UTC)