User talk:Hogie75

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Hogie75, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --Crossmr 23:21, 17 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

A tag has been placed on Casino New Brunswick, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item G11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, . Clicking that button will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the article's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. PTJoshua (talk) 19:02, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion

A discussion has been opened on the article:

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Casino New Brunswick

–BuickCentury Driver 21:16, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Causeway

Hey, thanks for your interest in the Petitcodiac River. I've nominated Petitcodiac River Causeway (New Brunswick) for speedy deletion under A10. The article used to exist but it was suggested during a peer review to merge all applicable information to Petitcodiac River (you can see the old article here). There isn't much to add about the causeway that isn't already said in the article. If you have any additions, try to integrate it. Thanks! _EricLeb⁰¹ (Page | Talk) 01:25, 18 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edits

Hey there Gene, I'm concerned about some of your recent edits and page moves. Please refrain from moving any further articles until you read and review the guidelines for moving a page, along with naming conventions for article titles. If you have questions, please feel free to contact me. Best regards, Cind.amuse (Cindy) 18:50, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Moncton Tourism, Lodging, Parks, Dining & Shopping Areas

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Moncton Tourism, Lodging, Parks, Dining & Shopping Areas requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. →Σ τ c. 21:55, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

December 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to List of Heritage and Historic Properties in Moncton, but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. You've added some churches to this list, but I've looked at a number of them and I see no indication that they have been recognized by any group or level of government as an "heritage" or "historic" building. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:10, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, articles should not be moved, as you did to Moncton High School (Old), without good reason. They need to have a name that is both accurate and intuitive. Wikipedia has some guidelines in place to help with this. Generally, a page should only be moved to a new title if the current name doesn't follow these guidelines. Also, if a page move is being discussed, consensus needs to be reached before anybody moves the page. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. There is as yet no other Moncton High School, and when one is built, it's not clear what it will be named, and whether a disambiguation will be necessary. Right now, this is WP:CRYSTAL. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:05, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I understand that a new building has been announced. If you wish, you may create a new stub article along the lines of Moncton High School (new). But renaming the current building, when the new one has not yet been built or officially named, is premature and unnecessary. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:19, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Primary and middle school articles

I just wanted to touch bases with you regarding recent article creations about middle schools. We don't actually retain articles for primary and middle schools, unless they have established notability separate from mere existence. In essence, this would be done through meeting the general notability guidelines, which require significant coverage in reliable, secondary sources. In accordance with common outcomes of deletion discussions, I have therefore either redirected the articles to that of the city/town or school district. If you have questions, please feel free to contact me. Best regards, Cind.amuse (Cindy) 21:13, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of famous people from New Brunswick (Canada)

The article List of famous people from New Brunswick (Canada) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unwieldy list with too large a scope; a category will be able to handle this information much better.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 16:59, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Username/Userpage

I've moved your userpages back to here for now, simply moving them does not change your username, it just makes the pages ownerless. To change your username you need to use WP:CHU--Jac16888 ^Talk 13:20, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dieppe, New Brunswick (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Anglophone, Transportation network, Distribution, Lest we forget and Industrial

List of events in Greater Moncton (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Classic Rock, Sporting and Athletics

Media in Greater Moncton (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Dieppe, FM transmitter and Halifax, Nova Scotia

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:36, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

More information needed about File:Riverfront Trail Greater Moncton.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Riverfront Trail Greater Moncton.jpg. However, it needs some more work before it is okay to use on Wikipedia.

Please click here and do the following:

Add a description of where the image comes from (not what it is) and who the creator is. Please be specific, and include a link if you can.
Find the appropriate license from the list of free, non-free media, or public domain options. Copy the license template and paste it in the file's page, and save.

If you follow these steps, your image can help enhance Wikipedia. If you have any questions, feel free to ask at the media copyright questions page.

Thank you for your contribution! --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 14:06, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Scoudouc, New Brunswick (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Westmorland County

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:14, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Pumphouse Brewery, New Brunswick for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pumphouse Brewery, New Brunswick is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pumphouse Brewery, New Brunswick until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:31, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Userpage

As I said above, please do not simply move your userpage, it does not change your name. Your sig & contributions will still say User:Genehogan. I get that you want to change it so please, do it properly and request a username change at WP:CHU--Jac16888 ^Talk 15:10, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Moncton categories

Can you please cool it on the creation of the Moncton/Greater Moncton categories. You are creating duplicates of duplicates, mis-assigning parent categories, and generally creating a mess of the Moncton category scheme. Good Ol’factory ^(talk) 00:13, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Adding "References" sections and other edits

Hi there, can you please explain why you're adding "References" sections to articles that already have them? like this edit here.[1] This is creating work for other editors who have to go back and cleanup those articles. Also from other recent edits you made, when adding section titles to articles, don't begin each word with a capital letter, and commercial links shouldn't be added as external links. I have only a checked a few of your edits, and fixed them. It will save others time if you would go back and help cleanup the others. Thank you. Cmr08 (talk) 03:32, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Regions of New Brunswick

Category:Regions of New Brunswick, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 04:12, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Annual events in Sackville, New Brunswick

Category:Annual events in Sackville, New Brunswick, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 04:18, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Shopping areas in Canada

Category:Shopping areas in Canada, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 04:43, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Shopping in Canada

Category:Shopping in Canada, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:27, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

A suggestion

Hi again, I see that you've resumed editing your list List of Moncton localities & neighbourhoods, indicating which malls have an A&W, etc. That's great, but if you don't mind a suggestion, take a look at the list of red-linked missing articles at List of National Historic Sites of Canada in New Brunswick. These are national historic sites that are inherently notable. Maybe you'd like to create an article or two on one of these sites in the province? Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:22, 29 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

February 2012

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. In your recent edit to New Brunswick Route 106, you added links to an article which did not add content or meaning, or repeated the same link several times throughout the article. Please see Wikipedia's guideline on links to avoid overlinking. Thank you. Cmr08 (talk) 22:02, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Are you seeing your messages?

Gene, despite asking to change your user name, and redirecting your talk page to Hogie75, I see you're still editing as Genehogan, not Hogie75. Do you realize that? And are you aware of the talk page messages at User talk:Hogie75? If so, feel free to delete this message. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:36, 29 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Populated places in Greater Moncton

Category:Populated places in Greater Moncton, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on theCategories for discussion page. Thank you. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:51, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Shopping area

The article Shopping area has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Dicdef stub. Term does not seem to exist, apparently WP:MADEUP.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop theproposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reachconsensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 01:28, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

List of Moncton localities and neighbourhoods

Hi there, just wanted to let you know I wasn't trying to offend you or anyone else by attempting to clean up your List of Moncton localities and neighbourhoods article. To be honest, I don't see what the problem is with cleaning up the wikilinks so they don't have to be re-directed, but if you prefer, I'll stay away from your article and won't bother trying to fix the wikilinks anymore. Cmr08 (talk) 00:55, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Barnaby River (New Brunswick)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Barnaby River (New Brunswick) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Callanecc (talk) 00:54, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Beaches of Greater Moncton

Category:Beaches of Greater Moncton, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 22:58, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Moncton landmarks

Hi. When you replaced the Commons category link to Moncton with Greater Moncton in Template:Moncton landmarks, did you think to check if there was, in fact, a Commons category by that name? There isn't. I've restored the previous working link. Please remember to check that there is a valid destination when you link to the Commons. thanks, Shawn in Montreal (talk) 23:10, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

List of buildings and structures in Metro Moncton (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Christ Church

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:44, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Hiking trails in Greater Moncton

Category:Hiking trails in Greater Moncton, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:44, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Dorchester, New Brunswick

Category:Dorchester, New Brunswick, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 00:37, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of New Brunswick Route 150

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on New Brunswick Route 150 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. DreamFieldArts (talk) 21:14, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome, roadfan!

Hello, Hogie75, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like this place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

If you are interested, there is already a community of users who are roadfans or who edit articles about roads, just like you! Stop by any of these WikiProjects—WP:HWY (worldwide), WP:CRWP (Canada), WP:INR (India), WP:UKRD (United Kingdom), or WP:USRD (United States)—and contribute. For those in the United States, there is an excellent new user's guide. There is a wealth of information and resources for creating a great article. If you have questions about any of these WikiProjects, you can ask on each project's talk page, or you can ask me!

If you like communicating through IRC, feel free to ask questions at #wikipedia-en-roads ^connect as well. Here, there are several editors who are willing to answer your questions. For more information, see WP:HWY/IRC.

Again, welcome! Imzadi 1979 → 18:59, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I've noticed your recent work on New Brunswick highways. If you have any questions, feel free to ask me, or ask at WT:CRWP, the talk page for the Canada Roads WikiProject. Imzadi 1979 → 18:59, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Petitcodiac River

Hi there Hogie75, I'm not sure how I helped you make a point about something because I really don't know the story behind all this. All I was doing was saying that you only put articles in categories that they fit it. Do you want to fill me in on what you're talking about? From the message you left me, and the edit summary on Petitcodiac River, you mention about not being allowed to create an article. What article are you not allowed to create? Did you already try and end up being deleted? If that's the case, there must be a better way to state your case than to make a point by putting an article in a category where it doesn't belong. Cmr08 (talk) 18:11, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

suggestions:

Hey - nice work on NB road articles. Even so, please tak a look at changes I have made to New Brunswick Route 325, New Brunswick Route 330, and a few others. There are many grammatical mistakes that are easy to fix for the next time, and one technical aspect with the {{convert}} template. Please incorporate this into your future article making. Thanks. "Pepper" @ 20:11, 22 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

May 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added to the page Crystal Palace Complex (Dieppe) do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used as a platform for advertising or promotion, and doing so is contrary to the goals of this project. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Cmr08 (talk) 00:53, 24 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Before you get upset over the Welcome to Wikipedia part, using the level 1 template adds that. I know your not new to Wikipedia, instead of the template, I should have just said that just because a local business doesn't have a Wikipedia article, is no reason to add the external links to appear rather than a red-link. Commercial links are not appropriate in this manner. Please see WP:ELNO, and sorry if the warning offended you, like I said, it's the template that adds the content. Cmr08 (talk) 00:59, 24 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Cails Mills, New Brunswick

This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a search with the contents of Cails Mills, New Brunswick, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Weldford Parish, New Brunswick. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. MadmanBot (talk) 09:38, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

July 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. You've recently created a number of unreferenced articles on NB. Your personal research is most admirable, but please remember to include a reference or even an external link where readers can verify at least some of these statements. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 23:02, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

When you find info on your Google searches, why not add those as references? Especially for your settlements articles, which seem to have quite a lot of unverified statements. And you should not be adding text that have ???? to Wikipedia article space, ever. best, Shawn in Montreal (talk) 13:41, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating New Brunswick Route 585, Hogie75!

Wikipedia editor Pepper just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Don't forget to have an accessdate parameter in your refs

To reply, leave a comment on Pepper's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

A page you started has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating New Brunswick Route 880, Hogie75!

Wikipedia editor Darrell Greenwood just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Marked as reviewed

To reply, leave a comment on Darrell Greenwood's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Red links

Hi, thanks for your update to Tantramar Marsh. I see you created WP:REDLINKs. It's true that red links help Wikipedia to grow, but the guidelines do say that links should not be created in cases where it is unlikely that an article will ever be created. A quick Google reveals that there is very little information out there about these topics. That being said, a note on the markup: should the list be like this so that the Tantramar is consistent with the other river names' format. It is drained by the Aulac, LaPlanche, Missaguash, and Tantramar Rivers.--Cornellier (talk) 20:38, 30 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Simonds Parish, St John County, Hogie75!

Wikipedia editor Rarkenin just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thanks for the article. Make sure to avoid linking to non-existent articles as per Wikipedia:Write_the_article_first. Thanks!

To reply, leave a comment on Rarkenin's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Delineration

Hi Hogie75, hoping to learn something new here. I'm not familiar with the term "delineration" added as a section heading at Simonds Parish, Saint John County, New Brunswick. I see it is at other parish articles as well. I looked for a definition at wiktionary.org and dictionary.com but there are no entries. I am familiar with the term "delineation", which would be an applicable alternate term to describe the content within the section. Cheers, Hwy43 (talk) 03:40, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pardon the late reply. Busy work week. The link provided makes no reference to the term. I'm going to be bold and correct the spelling among all instances and if someone objects we'll find the answer. Cheers, Hwy43 (talk) 05:28, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nevermind. As I swept through them all, it became evident that it was a typo. I did notice numerous articles where the section stated "X Parish is defined in the Territorial Division Act as:" with nothing to follow, if you feel inclined to complete them as you did with Simonds Parish, Saint John County, New Brunswick. Hwy43 (talk) 05:53, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

List of people from Edmunston, New Brunswick

This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a search with the contents of List of people from Edmunston, New Brunswick, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: List of people from Bathurst, New Brunswick. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. MadmanBot (talk) 12:38, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

New Brunswick categories

For the record, not all (or even most) towns have their own eponymous Wikipedia categories; a town or city is allowed to have its own dedicated category only if and when Wikipedia actually has enough articles about things in the town (the city or town hall, the sports teams, schools, radio and television stations, parks, streets, etc.) to warrant one. If all we have is one main article about the town itself, which is actually quite common for smaller places which have fewer supplementary things to write about, then the town does not get to have its own category yet. And similarly, a town is also not allowed to have a "People from..." category until we have articles about a reasonable number of people who can be filed in it right off the top — a good rule of thumb is that somewhere between five to ten people who would belong in the category need to already have articles before you even start one. Bearcat (talk) 00:20, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

From Steam5 -> Hi Bearcat, I need your help on those New Brunswick categories, A user by the name of User:Hogie75 has made lots of new categories of New Brunswick. These New Brunswick categories are very small and the categories are only one article. Could you talk to User:Hogie75 on possibly creating new categories that are small categories, and on Wikipedia:Suspected copyright violations on creating List of people from Edmunston, New Brunswick, he misspelled "Edmundston", and copied from another New Brunswick category that was copied and violated, List of people from Bathurst, New Brunswick. Could you also go to Wikipedia:Suspected copyright violations#2013-04-18 (Suspected copyright violations) and talk to User:Hogie75 copyright violating between articles and categories. Also, the categories User:Hogie75 has challenged a contested deletion on all of the small New Brunswick categories for categories that are too small. User:Hogie75 has made the message here. Category talk:Tracadie-Sheila#Contested deletion. If you read my message talk to the User:Hogie75 on contesting deletion on small NB categories and violated and copied another NB article from it's copyright problem. Okay? Thanks for all your help. Steam5 (talk) 19:53, 19 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I will keep this on my page for others to not make the same mistake as I did Steam5.01:47, 20 April 2013 (UTC)

CFB Halifax

Re: your recent edit, are there any Canadian Forces Navy bases anywhere other than in Canada? Verne Equinox (talk) 02:36, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Verne Equinox, yes there are several. Here is an example of one CFB_Baden-Soellingen.Hogie75 10:09, 8 October 2013 (UTC)

Category:History of Canada by province or territory by location

Category:History of Canada by province or territory by location, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 22:28, 9 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

People from Nova Scotia

Please note that a person does not go in Category:People from Nova Scotia if they're already in a county or city specific subcategory, such as Category:People from Inverness County, Nova Scotia or Category:People from Sydney, Nova Scotia. The main "People from Nova Scotia" category is meant to be as close as possible to being empty of individual articles, only directly containing people who cannot be filed in any more specific subcategory due to lack of enough information; if we know what specific city, town or county a person was from, then they go only in the subcategory for that specific town or county and not in the general provincewide category. Thanks. Bearcat (talk) 21:22, 21 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

National parks cats

Hi Hogie75, could you rename all the national park cats by province and territory to "National parks in X" rather than "National parks of X"? The "of" is possessive, and Canada's provinces and territories do not possess them. Rather, it is Canada that possesses them and they are geographically within or "in" its provinces and territories. Thanks, keep up the good work, and happy holidays to you! Cheers, Hwy43 (talk) 00:52, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ok but I didn't start it "National parks of Quebec" was made before I categorized everything else. I will do it, so long as you are sure this is right.01:26, 28 December 2013 (UTC)

Category:Provincial parks in Canada by province or territory - ??

Just noticed this....how can a territory have a provincial park, since it's not a province? I'm not sure there even are "territorial parks" btw.Skookum1 (talk) 22:11, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting dilemma Skookum1, there are territorial parks such as Chan Lake Territorial Park, I am unsure how to proceed. I would say rather than renaming the category for a few places just to include them in as they are already included in the List of Canadian provincial parks page. Thoughts??01:36, 28 December 2013 (UTC)

Odd edits

I reverted your edits on List of waterfalls of Canada. Both entries were about legitimate waterfalls. Care to explain?--Auric talk 16:42, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I am moving/cleaning up the article for New Brunswick and placing them in with the List of bodies of water of New Brunswick articles for Brunswick. (If you move to the New Brunswick Article section, you will see a way to view all the bodies of water here) It makes more sense in my opinion as this page is in pretty rough shape. I asked people over a week if they had any objections on the Talk Page. No one replied so I began moving the article gradually.16:50, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

I am sort of envisioning the page eventually to become more like List of rivers of Canada as the current layout is very confusing, but that would be a huge undertaking right now as the current page is has a lot of redundant information.17:06, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

Okay, I see. In future, though, a descriptive edit summary would have cleared this up a lot faster.--Auric talk 17:39, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, good to know. I am glad someone else monitors these pages other than me. Thanks again17:42, 3 January 2014 (UTC)

Edith Cavell School

Hello Hogie75 - I see that you've resurrected the "article" about Edith Cavell School, which is fine except there's apparently nothing notable about it. If you can establish some form of notability for the school, great, but in the vast majority of cases there's not much notable about an elementary-level school. PK T(alk) 15:25, 31 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited New Brunswick electoral redistribution, 2013, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Carleton (electoral district) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Coal Valley - Tasmania

Please could you explain what you are up to? https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Coal_River_Valley&curid=8097154&diff=596677888&oldid=596578222 - insufficient edit summaries to know why you are doing that satusuro 14:08, 23 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Moncton

You may need to familiarize yourself with what a population centre actually is. It's not the whole metropolitan area of Moncton, but it isn't just the city either — rather, it's the aggregation of the specific set of census blocks emanating from downtown Moncton that meets the statistical definition of an urban area. It can include areas outside of the city boundaries of Moncton, if their urbanized sections are contiguous with urbanized sections of Moncton, and it can exclude areas inside the city boundaries of Moncton that aren't densely populated enough to qualify as "urban". So the population number doesn't have to correspond to either the city or the whole metropolitan area — the only thing it has to do is match whatever number Statistics Canada lists here. Bearcat (talk) 20:15, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No worries. Yeah, I don't deny that it can be a bit confusing — it gets even crazier in Ontario, where places like Ottawa and Sudbury have five or six separate population centres inside a single city, because there are large unpopulated areas between population clusters, and Clarington is split up between one part (Bowmanville-Newcastle) that's its own population centre and another part (Courtice) that's part of Oshawa's population centre instead. But even if we don't understand these things or why they exist, Wikipedia just has to accept that they are what they are anyway... :-) Bearcat (talk) 20:47, 28 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Just FYI, I've found a feature on the Statistics Canada website which provides visual clarification of exactly what constitutes the "population centre" of Moncton — on this map, the "population centre" is the white area with a burgundy boundary around it, while the orange lines are the municipal boundaries — and then the McEwen area forms its own separate "small population centre" for some statistically relevant reason or other. Hopefully that'll help you out a bit, since I'm sure my explanation above was kind of (or a lot) confusing. Bearcat (talk) 18:20, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of world's largest roadside attractions, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Container (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

World's Largest Wind Chimes listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect World's Largest Wind Chimes. Since you had some involvement with the World's Largest Wind Chimes redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. BDD (talk) 22:05, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

World's Largest Rosary listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect World's Largest Rosary. Since you had some involvement with the World's Largest Rosary redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. BDD (talk) 23:10, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

World's Largest Artificial Bottle of Lemon & Paeroa listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect World's Largest Artificial Bottle of Lemon & Paeroa. Since you had some involvement with the World's Largest Artificial Bottle of Lemon & Paeroa redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 10:01, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

World's Largest Artificial Pysanka listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect World's Largest Artificial Pysanka. Since you had some involvement with the World's Largest Artificial Pysanka redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 10:29, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

World's Largest Artificial Coin listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect World's Largest Artificial Coin. Since you had some involvement with the World's Largest Artificial Coin redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 10:30, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

World's Largest Artificial Orange listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect World's Largest Artificial Orange. Since you had some involvement with the World's Largest Artificial Orange redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 10:32, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

World's Largest Artificial Mastodon listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect World's Largest Artificial Mastodon. Since you had some involvement with the World's Largest Artificial Mastodon redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 10:33, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

World's Largest Artificial Salmon listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect World's Largest Artificial Salmon. Since you had some involvement with the World's Largest Artificial Salmon redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 10:34, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong name

Recently, you changed a redlink to James R. Hartley to James Hartley (Canadian politician), plainly the wrong person. Please check before doing this.--Auric talk 20:30, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I did not change a redlink, I created a link to a James Hartley who was a Canadian MLA who I incorrectly assumed was the proper person. I do not think this was a case of "Plainly the wrong person" with the provided information. Plainly the wrong person would have been someone named John smith from England.Hogie75 20:46, 11 April 2014 (UTC)

Sorry about that. I guess we both made mistakes.--Auric talk 21:26, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article has now been tagged for speedy deletion, because it "Does not show the importance of the subject". Could you take a stab at expanding it?--Auric talk 03:57, 21 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see this as a contestant of "Speedy deletion" because it "does not show the importance of the subject"? I contested this. The person was a MLA, there are many more MLA's with a lot fewer information on here. At the very least it should be debated.04:34, 21 April 2014 (UTC)

Thank you. I'd take the notice off, but I'm not really supposed to. The editor who posted it is new and probably doesn't understand some things here yet.--Auric talk 04:47, 21 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Coastal forts in BC category

Hi, I just moved Yorke Island coastal fort to Yorke Island (Canada) and note on it and Barrett Point there are many other World War II fortifications listed. The "Forts in British Columbia" category is really for places with "Fort" as part of the name, fur trade or military or otherwise. I'm thinking Category:Fortifications in British Columbia or Category:World War II fortifications in British Columbia, with corresponding parallel categories for WWI, the Cold War, Spanish American War, and the colonial/early provincial period might be called for - especially given the number of places that especially were in service during World War II.....this was not "Fort Yorke Island", for example; for now I'm moved the category to the Yorke Island coastal fort redirect.Skookum1 (talk) 05:45, 3 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

May 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of people from New Brunswick may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:08, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Highfield Square (Moncton)

The article Highfield Square (Moncton) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Defunct NN 60-store mall.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Epeefleche (talk) 08:12, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Northwest Centre (Moncton)

The article Northwest Centre (Moncton) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

NN 10-store retail park.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Epeefleche (talk) 08:13, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Smile-worthy

		The Minor Barnstar
		for using a "see also" instead of muskets and swords in the ongoing Canada/US dispute over two islands.ElijahBosley ^{(talk ☞)} 02:32, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Saint Gregoire, New Brunswick

A tag has been placed on Saint Gregoire, New Brunswick, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect to a nonexistent page, or a redirect loop.

If you can fix this redirect to point to an existing Wikipedia page, please do so and remove the speedy deletion tag. However, please do not remove the speedy deletion tag unless you also fix the redirect. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. ï¿½ (talk) 10:33, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Trans Canada Trail, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Black River, Nova Scotia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

List of local service districts in New Brunswick page

Hi Hogie.

I'll be posting a major upgrade to this page as soon as I've pared down my data to something readable by normal users; the raw-form table runs to something like eighty pages in Word. This includes date of creation, boundary changes, location in Regulation 84-168, and other information, as well as previous LSDs and the three classes of false LSDs. The table format I've in mind isn't compatible with what you've started doing, though. I've spent a couple years on this, and apparently I know a lot more than the person who answered my e-mail asking for details like whether there's an official term for areas with special services.

Thanks for the editing on my main page for local service districts; your work on the table will save me a lot of time when I finish adding information for other sections of the page.

Ok Good to know. I will leave it for a few weeks thenHogie75 18:52, 9 July 2014 (UTC)

Greetings again. I see you've been adding links for the page - very good idea. I think, though, that the official name is the proper item to link, not the unofficial short form.

BTW, I'm up to 1973 for adding source references in my working copy at home. I think I'd better wait until you've finished adding links before I try posting it. G. Timothy Walton (talk) 17:52, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Arthur Hill Gillmor, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Paris World Fair. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 13 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Durham Parish

Is there actually any good reason why every individual named hamlet inside a parish has to have its own separate article independent of the one on the parish itself? Especially when that article isn't actually sourced at all? Bearcat (talk) 20:59, 8 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

No there isn't that I see, however there is no good reason to remove it either that I see. I am not suggesting making new ones, but for the people who already put the time and effort to making them, why remove them and redirect them if they are created. I don't see anything in the article sourced relating to size of towns that makes it either notable or not.Hogie75 01:10, 9 August 2014 (UTC)

Indeed, the notability or non-notability of a populated community is not a question of size — it is, however, a question of how much sourcing can or cannot actually be cited to support a separate article. The consensus for unincorporated communities in Canada, as documented at WP:CANSTYLE#Article or redirect?, is that they have to be redirected to their parent municipality if there isn't actually enough sourcing present for them to stand alone as independent topics. Bearcat (talk) 21:01, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting article, I often wondered where to draw the line, this article seems to answer that question. I will no longer block the articles if you decide to revert them.23:48, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

A beer for you!

Thanks for your work to improve the List of beaches article; much appreciated! NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:47, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

List of beaches in Vermont

Hey, I noticed you created List of beaches in Vermont as a redirect to itself. I assume you intended it to redirect somewhere else, so I'm pointing out the mistake so you can fix it. —Mr. Granger (talk · contribs) 18:12, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, It should be fixed now.18:35, 25 August 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Doaktown Consolidated High School

Hello, Hogie75. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Doaktown Consolidated High School, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

edit the page
remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. scope_creep 19:48, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

New Brunswick Route 148

Hi Hogie75 -- I'm looking for info on New Brunswick Route 148 for an Internet project I'm working on. Google Maps, until recently, showed Route 148 as following the bypassed section of Route 8. That's gone now, with markings only north of Killarney Rd. OpenStreetMap, OTOH, shows Route 148 going down Killarney Rd and St Marys St, to meet up with Route 105 at Maple St. The only other info I've been able to find is your Wikipedia article. Did you write the route description based on the routing as shown in OSM or some other source? Or have you verified it yourself by checking out the signage in the field? Curious to know, as I'd like some definitive sources for my info. Many thanks! —Yakra (talk · contribs) 15:58, 11 October 2014 (EDT)

Here is a government run webcam on Route 148. Not sure what else you want. I will try to get more information. 20:51, 14 October 2014 (UTC) http://www2.gnb.ca/content/gnb/en/departments/dti/highways_roads/content/highway_cameras/route_148/durham_bridge.html

New Moncton High School

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of New Moncton High School, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/moncton-high-school-construction-tender-awarded-1.1357832.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 22:47, 16 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, and thanks for creating this article, as well as responding to the above copyright bot notice. There are still large chunks of text directly copied from the source web site though. These would need to be reworded in your own words to avoid copyright issues. You can see a list of the items at issue Here. Obviously things like the name of the school, and small phrases like "is being constructed" are fine, but the first 4-5 items will definitely need to be re-done, or they risk being removed from the article. Thanks again for the article, and for your attention to this. Crow^Caw 00:18, 5 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

World's Largest Artificial Apple listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect World's Largest Artificial Apple. Since you had some involvement with the World's Largest Artificial Apple redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. --BDD (talk) 23:56, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

cave list additions

Hello, make sure to read the discussion that is already present on the List of Caves talk page regarding red links. I have nothing against red links by themselves, but for caves there needs to be some sort of verification that a cave really exists. A redlink with no reference does not mean the cave exists. Anyone could then add any old silly name to the list without corroborating it. Thanks for your blue link additions though! Leitmotiv (talk) 00:19, 18 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Schools in Quebec

Would you be interested in expanding the newly created article List of schools in Quebec? There are over 2000 schools left to catalog. Lightspeed2012 23:51, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I could be, I am still working on New Brunswick, was planning on going to Nova Scotia but could head east instead.11:01, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
- ok, if you start, there are 15 regions to cover with at least 70 school boards on this list, List of school districts in Quebec. I completed region 2 and I am working on 3 and 6. Sometimes I work on other articles like I just created the list for schools in Yukon. Lightspeed2012 12:44, 2 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Rollback granted

Hi Hogie75. After reviewing your request for rollback, I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:

Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
Rollback should never be used to edit war.
If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
Use common sense.

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! — MusikAnimal ^talk 21:30, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Autopatrolled

Hello, this is just to let you know that I have granted you the "autopatrolled" permission. This won't affect your editing, it just automatically marks any page you create as patrolled, benefiting new page patrollers. Please remember:

This permission does not give you any special status or authority
Submission of inappropriate material may lead to its removal
You may wish to display the {{Autopatrolled}} top icon and/or the {{User wikipedia/autopatrolled}} userbox on your user page
If, for any reason, you decide you do not want the permission, let me know and I can remove it

If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. Otherwise, happy editing! HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 22:40, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Editing of New Brunswick Names

Hi Hogie.

I know you do a lot of work on New Brunswick places, but I've noticed some errors creeping in lately, ones apparently based on unofficial sources.

The proper sources for spellings and names of New Brunswick LSDs and municipalities are the appropriate Regulations under the Municipalities Act. Other sites, even those of the communities themselves, may differ, but these are not the official spellings. Translations can be very misleading, as well.

Also, should every occurrence of a reference to another page be formatted as a link? I haven't seen this on other pages, and it does seem a lot of work for a redundant purpose.

Anyway, thanks for all the work you do, but please be careful in the sources you trust.

G. Timothy Walton (talk) 18:55, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

Can you provide some examples Timothy, I look up a lot of different sources to ensure that I am giving the most accurate information available.

Thanks.22:27, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

You've done so much work, I'll have to wait until I have (laptop + time) again to go over it all. I put a couple of links on the Sainte-Marie-Saint-Raphael Talk page that should help with official spellings; both of them will have a link in the upper right corner for the English form. G. Timothy Walton (talk) 00:36, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of schools in Prince Edward Island, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Grade 3. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:36, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Shippegan Parish, New Brunswick listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Shippegan Parish, New Brunswick. Since you had some involvement with the Shippegan Parish, New Brunswick redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Ivanvector 🍁 (talk) 16:16, 13 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:20, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

May 2016

Greetings. At least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been or will be reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Please do not make dozens of page moves without seeking consensus first. For controversial moves, see WP:RM. Calidum ¤ 16:01, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please see WP:AN for a thread concerning these page moves. Calidum ¤ 16:31, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It's not a big deal, we all make mistakes. All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 02:44, 9 May 2016 (UTC).[reply]

Coordinate translation from dms to decimal degrees

I found 2 article edits of yours that did not properly convert the coordinates from dms to decimal degrees. Canterbury, New Brunswick and Cambridge-Narrows both of which I fixed. I stopped checking after finding 2 since it did not appear to be a one off. --Bamyers99 (talk) 18:26, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Hogie75. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

New 10,000 Challenge for Canada

Hi, Wikipedia:WikiProject Canada/The 10,000 Challenge is up and running based on Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge for the UK which has currently produced over 2300 article improvements and creations. If you'd like to see large scale quality improvements happening for Canada like The Africa Destubathon, which has produced over 1600 articles in 5 weeks, sign up on the page. The idea will be an ongoing national editathon/challenge for Canada but fuelled by a contest such as The North America Destubathon to really get articles on every province and subject mass improved. I would like some support from Canadian wikipedians here to get the Challenge off to a start with some articles to make doing a Destubathon worthwhile! Cheers. --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:55, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

January 2017

Hello, I'm Northamerica1000. I noticed that you recently removed some content from User talk:Northamerica1000 without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 21:51, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have no idea how I did that. Sorry.21:53, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
- No worries. Probably a mis-click. Cheers, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:00, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:People from Grand Manan has been nominated for discussion

Category:People from Grand Manan, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 15:21, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem: Fundy National Park

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Fundy National Park, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images from either web sites or printed works. This article appears to contain work copied from https://www.pc.gc.ca/en/pn-np/nb/fundy/decouvrir-discover/cultur, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Fundy National Park and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, Fundy National Park, in your email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If you hold the copyright to the work: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Fundy National Park. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0", or that the work is released into the public domain, or if you have strong reason to believe it is, leave a note at Talk:Fundy National Park with a link to where we can find that note or your explanation of why you believe the content is free for reuse.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Fundy National Park saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.

Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Drm310 🍁 (talk) 18:59, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ummmmm ok. I think what I did was move around the images on the page. I certainly didn't add any copyright material talk.11:19, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

CCI Notice

Hello, Hogie75. This message is being sent to inform you that a request for a contributor copyright investigation has been filed at Contributor copyright investigations concerning your contributions to Wikipedia in relation to Wikipedia's copyrights policy. The listing can be found here. For some suggestions on responding, please see Responding to a CCI case. Thank you. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 20:14, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sunny Brae North, New Brunswick

The article Sunny Brae North, New Brunswick has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This place is a tiny part of a small city, and there is really nothing here to warrant an article. Also, it is questionable whether this neighborhood even exists.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ultimograph5 (talk) 16:48, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Hogie75. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of kite festivals

The article List of kite festivals has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

A list of a bunch of unsourced, dubiously claimed festivals. Aside from one single entry which has an article of course.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 13:18, 12 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of buildings and structures in Metro Moncton for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of buildings and structures in Metro Moncton is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of buildings and structures in Metro Moncton until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ultimograph5 (talk) 22:59, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Northwest Centre (Moncton) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Northwest Centre (Moncton) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Northwest Centre (Moncton) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ultimograph5 (talk) 16:52, 7 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of South End, Moncton for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article South End, Moncton is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/South End, Moncton until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ultimograph5 (talk) 18:20, 8 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Old North End, Moncton for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Old North End, Moncton is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Old North End, Moncton until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ultimograph5 (talk) 17:27, 15 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Hogie75. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Lists of beaches in England

A tag has been placed on Category:Lists of beaches in England requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 03:29, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:River valleys of Serbia

A tag has been placed on Category:River valleys of Serbia indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:18, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Painsec Junction, New Brunswick

The article Painsec Junction, New Brunswick has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Nothing more than a railroad junction, insufficient coverage to meet GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. –dlthewave ☎ 17:14, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Fire departments in New Brunswick

A tag has been placed on Category:Fire departments in New Brunswick indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. ✗plicit 14:52, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Insurance companies of Puerto Rico

A tag has been placed on Category:Insurance companies of Puerto Rico indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:27, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]