User talk:Gencepor

Hi! I am the first to write here! :)--Gencepor (talk) 08:48, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

You deserve it!

ParlForNav (talk) 09:01, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Aitor Urruticoechea

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Aitor Urruticoechea requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DGG ( talk ) 17:04, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, agree. This is a collaborative work. If you think it's not relevant, I hear you and approve it.--Gencepor (talk) 17:32, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Boycott of the 2022 International Congress of Mathematicians

The article Boycott of the 2022 International Congress of Mathematicians has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

seems to fail ONEEVENT -- and also seems to be advocacy

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DGG ( talk ) 17:13, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Eduardo Castañón for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Eduardo Castañón is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eduardo Castañón until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

DGG ( talk ) 17:20, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Carlos Yárnoz

The article Carlos Yárnoz has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I don't think the obits or the position are enough for notability "friend of" a notable person isn't quite near enough.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DGG ( talk ) 17:26, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

:v, it's not just being his friend, Carlos Yárnoz is an important (and famous) journalist in Spain, and so far, encyclopedic...--Gencepor (talk) 17:28, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

September 2021

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Bbb23 (talk) 18:34, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

What?

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Gencepor (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have been blocked, and I don't know why. I am not a sock puppet of nothing. I was editing, and suddenly I got blocked.Gencepor (talk) 18:49, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 19:12, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hi 𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇, false. I am new on Wikipedia. New. How can you prove that?--Gencepor (talk) 20:01, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]