User talk:GenSQuantum

January 2020

Hello, I'm The Mirror Cracked. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Greenhouse gas seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. The Mirror Cracked (talk) 23:38, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

With regards to a definition of neutrality, a neutral position would need to have a foundation based on factual data. Empirical and factual data is absent from the article, therefore and by virtue of the fact, a position of neutrality cannot be ascertained. The majority of independent scientists do have a neutral point of view, as do I. That is why it is a fact that Human induced Global warming is purely political science, please attempt to substantiate the claim with empirical evidence. Thank you - GenSQuantum

Thanks for confirming your inherent bias. Wikipedia follows what independent, reliable sources say, not the opinions of individual editors like yourself. The Mirror Cracked (talk) 00:28, 14 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProjectWales members are not independent.

No thank you for clarifying your own inherent bias, facts are irrefutable. Water vapor is the most abundant GHG and driving greenhouse gas contributor, not carbon dioxide. Political science is absurd. Misleading people must be your priority, well done in that regard. Congratulations. Furthermore, what authority do you have on the comprehension of knowledge?— Preceding unsigned comment added by GenSQuantum (talk • contribs)

I suggest you discuss the changes that you'd like to make to Greenhouse gas on the article Talk page and get consensus, thanks. Schazjmd (talk) 01:04, 14 January 2020 (UTC

@TheMirrorCracked I removed your comment, because it has no relevance. Who the heck do you think you are? The great God of knowledge? You sound insane. Move on. — Preceding unsigned comment added by GenSQuantum (talk • contribs)

Comment on content, not on fellow editors. The Mirror Cracked (talk) 02:16, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There you go, I removed the "personal attack" you precious little petal.

It's not my fault that you perceive facts as a personal attack. — Preceding unsigned comment added by GenSQuantum (talk • contribs)

"Get a life, you are insane" is a personal attack. The Mirror Cracked (talk) 02:33, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The extent that you are going to here is incredible. Just to remove the words "it is believed" after all this is the case. Otherwise empirical data would have been presented, right? — Preceding unsigned comment added by GenSQuantum (talk • contribs)

It wasn't me who removed it: [1] The Mirror Cracked (talk) 02:37, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, another WikiProjectWales member, same inference.

Nope, he's not a member Wikipedia:WikiProject Wales/Members The Mirror Cracked (talk) 02:49, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for clarifying, I'll take your word as absolute truth (NOT)

Last Words on this nonsense- If the words "It is believed" are to be correctly omitted from the article then EMPIRICAL data needs to be contributed. - GenSQuantum https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:GenSQuantum A group of editors are guarding this article of pure propaganda like vultures over a corpse. Unfortunately the Users - Schazjmd, Dennis Bratland and The Mirror Cracked are determined to mislead the public on this issue.

Talk pages

Help:Talk pages has useful information on how to format and indent posts (see WP:THREAD) and how to sign you posts at Help:Talk pages#Identifying yourself. --Dennis Bratland (talk) 04:03, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Personal attacks over greenhouse gas article. Dennis Bratland (talk) 06:08, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

permalink to discussion as of 06:51, 19 January 2020 (UTC) -- Deep fried okra 06:51, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Climate change discretionary sanctions notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in climate change. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Johnuniq (talk) 06:54, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

January 2020

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment, or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. EvergreenFir (talk) 22:07, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]