User talk:Geminiborn

Welcome to Wikipedia

Getting Started on

Please, click around! These easily navigable links should be indepesensable to the new user.

How to edit a page

Tutorial

Sandbox, the place where you can experiment

Where to ask a question.

What this site is based on

Manual of Style

What Wikipedia is not

Here are some ways you can help improve Wikipedia:

Create an article

Help remove vandalism

Translate an article

Improve illustrations and upload new images

Perform maintenance tasks

Become a member of a project that interests you

Contribute mottos to Motto of the Day

   Buster Seven Talk 18:53, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

July 2016

Hello, I'm Bamyers99. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Eddie Cibrian has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. --Bamyers99 (talk) 15:06, 10 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to List of state leaders in 2015. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. The Chancellor of Austria in 2015 was Werner Faymann. Christian Kern did not take office until May of this year. --Neve –selbert 20:47, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

July 2016

Stop changing birthdates in articles without any reason or sourcing. These edits have been reverted. Nate • (chatter) 12:30, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is officially your second warning about modifying birthdates (as done here, along with marital and career details (here), which can be considered vandalism. Stop doing this or face a block. Nate • (chatter) 08:36, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Tony Tan. I noticed that in this edit to Daniel Sunjata, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Tony Tan · talk 16:46, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

'This is your final warning. One more edit changing a birthday or removing marital details as you did here without a source, and you will face a block. Nate • (chatter) 16:17, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Lenny Platt. — TAnthony^Talk 16:42, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Widr (talk) 16:43, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

August 2016

Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Mark Consuelos— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Serols (talk) 15:43, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

September 2016

Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Mark Cameron Wystrach— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Serols (talk) 16:36, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Neill Barry. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Serols (talk) 16:36, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Issuing level 1 warning about removing AfD template from articles before the discussion is complete. (Peachy 2.0 (alpha 8))

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Ryan Zachary Ward. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 17:46, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

October 2016

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Callan Mulvey, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 22:16, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Mansour bin Zayed Al Nahyan. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to being blocked from editing. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 20:36, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Final warning

This is your last warning; stop changing name and birthday details! They need sources and the way you're doing it definitely resembles vandalism. Stop, or you'll be assessed another block. Nate • (chatter) 20:35, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

November 2016

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Damien Sandow. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been undone.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. KylieTastic (talk) 20:37, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

December 2016

Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Marc Kudisch— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Serols (talk) 17:41, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Edoardo Ballerini. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. KylieTastic (talk) 17:58, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Jorge Alberti. KylieTastic (talk) 20:33, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. RickinBaltimore (talk) 20:38, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]