Jump to content

User talk:Ged3000

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Ged3000, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  I love Wikipedia and I hope you do to! Dustimagic *\o/* (talk/contribs) *\o/* 13:53, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

TEAC

[edit]

Hello. I noticed that you have TEAC (tetramethylammonium chloride) on your to-do list. However, I just moved TEAC, the audio equipment manufacturer, from its misnamed place at "Teac" to the "TEAC" name space. If tetramethylammonium chloride is best listed as TEAC also, please let me know. We could do a disambiguation of TEAC, but at the moment I am leaning towards avoiding a disambiguation page, but rather point readers to a "tetramethylammonium chloride" article from the TEAC article. --Charles Gaudette 09:32, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ischemic stroke

[edit]

Thanks for your contribution to Stroke, any chance of a reference for what you added though? If not, no worries, i'll just place a citation needed tag near it :) Regards, CycloneNimrodTalk? 15:59, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Also good to see you're a medical student in Nottingham. I want to study medicine and I live here too ;) Regards, CycloneNimrodTalk? 16:02, 10 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Alice in Wonderland syndrome

[edit]

I'll happily add a mention if you have any sources I can cite with? If not, no worries and i'll have a look around on PubMed and other places myself. Regards, CycloneNimrodTalk? 19:47, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No worries. Unfortunately, we can't just place things on Wikipedia out of what we 'hear', otherwise our job here would be far too easy! I managed to find an article on PubMed anyway and i've added it to the Signs and symptoms section. It's only a brief mention but have a look and see what you think. Thanks. Regards, CycloneNimrodTalk? 19:58, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I apologise for the wrong wording of the edit. I'll change it in a moment. However, that article certainly does mention Lilliputian hallucinations, take a quick look at the brief: "The present paper describes a patient who exhibited 'Alice in Wonderland' (AIW) syndrome as well as Lilliputian hallucinations." The article then describes a patient with AIWS who also displays lilliputian hallucinations. Regards, CycloneNimrodTalk? 20:25, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Ah. That would be my fault, my normal referencing tool is down so I copied and pasted a citation from the page Stroke. I must have forgotten to replace the link. Thanks. Regards, CycloneNimrodTalk? 20:30, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hell, you're the medical student ;) This is the problem with laypersons on Wikipedia and it's why we always need professionals as well as people just blindly referencing things (people like myself!). Thanks for your help and good luck with your future placements, I hope they're as productive for WP as this one was ;) Regards, CycloneNimrodTalk? 20:47, 15 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi!

[edit]

Hey, thanks for the edit to subcutaneous emphysema! I see from the above that you're a medical student. *Grins deviously* Excellent, it's great to have folks around with medical knowledge! I'm a layperson myself, did you see any errors or anything in the article? I wonder if you happen to know the answer to this question: is air in the tissues from infections like gas gangrene subcutaneous emphysema proper, or does it count as something else? The sources I've found have been very ambiguous about the matter. Also, for another article I'm working on (pulmonary contusion), do you happen to know what the difference is (if any) between pulmonary toilet and pulmonary hygiene? Heh, I'll quit bugging you, I know med students are busy. Thanks again for the addition, and for your other work around the project! delldot talk 12:37, 18 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Thanks for the reply, I replied on my talk to keep the thread together. :) delldot on a public computer talk 00:08, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Library access

[edit]

Hi Ged, a few of us are working on subarachnoid haemorrhage and we're currently looking for access to this review article I was wondering if the Nottingham medical library had access to this journal? If you could try, that'd be fantastic. If not, no worries! Thanks :) Regards, CycloneNimrodTalk? 15:52, 27 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Epinephrine
added a link pointing to Nasal
Sodium bicarbonate
added a link pointing to Nasal

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:51, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:38, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

[edit]

Hello, Ged3000. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]