User talk:Gcdavis
Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. -- Syrthiss (talk) 15:24, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
The article Graham Conway Davis has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- BLP article is poorly referenced. No references to support biographical detail.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. The JPStalk to me 19:05, 16 December 2011 (UTC)
Your contributions
[edit]Hello Graham. Thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. You may wish to read our conflict of interest] guidelines, designed for contributors with a personal connection with what they are writing about. Please do not remove tags, such as 'reference improve' tags, without addressing the problem(s). Per WP:LINKSTOAVOID, it isn't a good idea to link to Amazon, or similar. Instead, just provide the bibliographic reference, including the ISBN, so that Wikipedia is not seen to be promoting a specific commercial organisation. The JPStalk to me 23:29, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
Nomination of Graham Conway Davis for deletion
[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Graham Conway Davis is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Graham Conway Davis until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. ukexpat (talk) 16:11, 19 December 2011 (UTC)
The file File:Graham-Davis.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
orphaned image, no encyclopedic use
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
