User talk:Gazmie

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. — MShabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 11:02, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

WP:ARBPIA alert

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

— MShabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 10:58, 30 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Edit War Warning of Proposals for a Palestinian State June 2015

Your recent editing history at Proposals_for_a_Palestinian_state shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
There has been no consensus for your changes, and you have ignored the discussion on the talk page. Please discuss before making any changes. Goalie1998 (talk) 14:37, 30 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Gazmie_reported_by_User:Goalie1998_(Result:_). Thank you. —Goalie1998 (talk) 15:34, 30 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Gazmie. You have new messages at Malik Shabazz's talk page.
Message added 16:55, 30 June 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Edit warring at Proposals for a Palestinian state

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

Violation of the WP:ARBPIA 1RR restriction. The full report is at WP:AN3#User:Gazmie reported by User:Goalie1998 (Result: Blocked). Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 17:32, 30 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Gazmie. You have new messages at Malik Shabazz's talk page.
Message added 23:22, 3 July 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

July 2015 Proposals for a Palestinian State

Be careful, discuss your edits on the talk page before you make repeated edits. You might get banned again. Goalie1998 (talk) 13:00, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please contribute under the WP:1RR. But also be WP:BOLD - and if they revert without explaining why, they violate against WP:CIVIL and can be banned in the long term. If you get warnings in short time, one after another do not go further until block. Seek help or dispute resolution, because Wikipedia admins see it as a bad habit to warn and block a user who did good faith edits in short sequence - giving them a ruffle from the admins! Make yourself knowledgeable with the usual guidelines, like Wikipedia:Consensus#Consensus-building in talk pages , Wikipedia:Disruptive editing, Wikipedia:Consensus , Wikipedia:Edit warring so that you can place links like [[WP:XYZ]] in your opinions on the talkpage - this is most effective. If they do violate against anything you also can place edit war warnings and can do reverts prior to them, see here and here. Thanks for your help! Be patient, compromise, never lose your temper, and keep your good spiritual force and energy --Miraclexix (talk) 11:19, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposals for a Palestinian state

You have violated the 1RR rule with your recent edits to Proposals for a Palestinian state. To avoid being blocked again for edit-warring, please self-revert (undo) your recent edits. Thank you. — MShabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 10:51, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

MShabazz, he may be not aware of the 1RR. See, the lead is edited by Wikipedia editors like user Goalie more than one time a day, also, and you do not oppose Goalie, nor threaten him with edit block warnings (as far as I know), because it seems to be to your personal liking. This violates WP:NPOV. His edits are truely WP:GF (good faith), because he has support, not only by me, but by Goalie also. Please do not pick on him in particular! Thank you and happy editing! --Miraclexix (talk) 11:36, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@ MShabazz

I feel you are constantly suffocating my input.

There have many other people who over the last few days have made edits.

The most recent edit I made was to change the term "Proposed Palestinian State " to "Proposed arab state" because it was referring to the period after the 1948 War, when the arabs did not yet refer to themselves as "Palestinian". For this period of time "Proposed arab state" is more accurate.

Malik, you seem to be abusing your power as an Administrator, by threatening to block me every time I try and make some imput.

If you, or others do not agree with the changes then they can be discussed or reverted. But please stop threatening to block me every time.

Gazmie (talk) 11:04, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relax, I feel the same. MShabazz every time reverts my edits with sparse explanations and claimed accusations in short timely distance. This violated WP:CIVIL. This will fall back into his Wikiface if the issue would get escalated to the Admins. While MShabazz is also bound under the 1RR, wisely plan your edits and try to get some consensus on your points. You have to see, that all the edits of Nableezy (the "Re-Write") did achieve also *no consensus* prior. If you self-revert, you only would spare MShabazz his 1 revert of the day! Relax you will not be blocked so soon again. Just try not to go on after a warning. The Lead is under construction with no clear consensus, so edits are #1 welcome and #2 legitimate! Maybe some of his claims/accusations are not true and consequently will not stand. Be variable and smart! :) --Miraclexix (talk) 11:26, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

July 2015

Please do not delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at Talk:Proposals for a Palestinian state. Such edits are disruptive and appear to be vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 16:52, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

		The Excellent New Editor's Barnstar A new editor on the right path
		You are outstanding! Everyone knows that Wikipedia can be a rough place, especially when being gamed, but you are steadfast. Thank you and look up your work again !! Miraclexix (talk) 20:15, 8 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 10:57, 8 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

WP:ARBPIA3

Hello. The Arbitration Committee has restricted editors with less than 500 edits and 30 days tenure from editing in the Arab-Israeli conflict topic area. You can see this here. Please do not edit articles in this topic area until you have you reached the requirement. Thank you. nableezy - 09:11, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]