User talk:Gavinmacqueen

Welcome!

Hello, Gavinmacqueen, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Introduction

5 The five pillars of Wikipedia

How to edit a page

Help

Tips

How to write a great article

Manual of Style

Fun stuff...

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! -- _Hdt83 ^Chat 03:00, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Original_contour_bottle.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Original_contour_bottle.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:45, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

In response to your comment

(In response to "...even in the dark!!! In other word, by touch. I believe you're thinking visually. If you have a problem with it, take it up with the Coca-Cola Company because they're the ones who coined the phrase.[1]")

Oh, is that so? Well, if that's the case, I suggest you do the following:

Don't make that point sound so silly.
Add a citation so the point doesn't get questioned.

Looking at the article, it seems that you did add a citation. Good; that's good practice. Now, the other thing you need to do is to not make the point sound so silly. May I suggest, 1. don't use boldface; it's unneccessary and it implies silliness in the way you used it, and 2. maybe something along the lines of, "Today, the contour Coca-Cola bottle is one of the most recognized packages on the planet, and as a result of the aforementioned contest, the bottle is literally suggested by the Coca-Cola Company to be recognizable in the dark." I don't care if what you used is a direct quote from Coca-Cola's site; heck, one may even liken it to be plagiarism if they really wanted to. (I'm not going to bother, though.)

I'll let you make the neccessary changes. Maybe you ought to learn something, too. As for the sample quote I provided, I could certainly come up with something better. If you word that quote differently, then more compliments to you!

My apologies for the misunderstanding. And another thing: please sign your posts on talk pages. It's just good etiquette. Also taking another look at my talk page, it seems you added that touch too. Good! That's a good thing. :)

--Digiku 05:01, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

(In response to "Well thank you for your input...I think :) I didn't like the bolded text either...I just did that toward the end just to taunt you...lol. [...]")

"Silly"? Gee, to say that, you wouldn't even know the half of what I mean.

Since it seems you recognized the previous point I made, I will now discuss another point: keep in mind Wikipedia's policy titled, "no personal attacks". By saying this, I refer to one edit summary of yours,

Did you read the paragraphs preceding? Coca-Cola wanted a bottle design which could be recognized boken or in the dark. Are u blond or something..lol

and one excerpt of your discussion with me, which I trust you enough to know what I'm talking about. Getting to the point, these are direct mentions to people who edit on Wikipedia. This is heavily advised against in "no personal attacks". For example, people may be offended by the mention of the "blonde stereotype". As quoted in "no personal attacks", "Insulting or disparaging an editor is a personal attack regardless of the manner in which it is done." Moreover, I find the following quote to be very important:

"Comments should not be personalized and should be directed at content and actions rather than people."

And more clearly put:

"Do not make personal attacks anywhere in Wikipedia. Comment on content, not on the contributor."

I find that it matters not what you meant by the comment you made, even if it was a playful joke. Just so long as the other party is offended, regardless of meaning, the comment is an offense. The reason I bring this to your attention is so just in case you ever find yourself in an edit war, you wouldn't be battered too badly. :) I haven't personally been in one myself, nor have I witnessed one in person, but I do know enough about them to say that they can get pretty ugly. They really can. So, if you ever find yourself in an edit war, think: if you're considering insulting the other person directly, as you did in the one edit summary and also directly saying a personal sentence of mine (which I also firmly believe in, mind,) is "silly", don't do it. Just, don't do it. Please. For your own good.

On that note, I wish for you never to be in a hostile edit war, especially as you seem to be upholding good faith. I respect that. And me, I don't want to be in an edit war, myself. :)

--Digiku 09:46, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

(In response to "Sorry....")

Granted, what you state is good wiki etiquette. And, all things considered, I did apologize, as I quote, "My apologies for the misunderstanding." If that wasn't clear the first time, then my humble apologies, again.

You may liken my initial reaction as an "allegation" of sorts. A plaintiff may state an allegation when they feel something of wrongdoing has occurred. It may then be up to the other party to prove that their actions are rightful. That's what I believe happened here. I accused you of making a rather "silly" edit on the Coca-Cola page. You then backed up your actions credibly by citing a source and explaining the reasons behind your edit. The reasoning you provided, in my opinion, is credible and justifies your edit. Moreover, you did this fairly (barring the out-of-place personal attacks, but let's not split hairs.) Therefore, I now understand why you made the edit, and the initial allegation I made is now retracted due to this higher understanding. That I won't take away from you.

And yes, your accusation that I was a little presumptuous in making my edit is indeed credible. I understand; I was a little overzealous in reverting that edit, I'll admit. Remember: I'm rather new to this, too. :P

If it helps ya' out at all, I did learn from this instance. Take a look at "Sideshow Bob's Last Gleaming" and its respective Talk page. I suspected that there may be a possible vandalism there, but I lack the means to verify the validity of the edit; therefore, I take it to the Talk page. :)

In any event, I admire the respect to your grandfather that you portray. This I say from a personal standpoint. More power to ya'.

--Digiku 19:13, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Original 1915 contour bottle.jpg listed for deletion

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as Image:Original 1915 contour bottle.jpg has been listed for speedy deletion because you selected a copyright license type implying some type of restricted use, such as for non-commercial use only, or for educational use only or for use on Wikipedia by permission. While it might seem reasonable to assume that such files can be freely used on Wikipedia, a non-profit website, this is in fact not the case. Please do not upload any more files with these restrictions on them, because content on Wikipedia needs to be compatible with the GNU Free Documentation License, which allows anyone to use it for any purpose, commercial or non-commercial.

If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it (or amend the image description if it has not yet been deleted) and use the license {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} to license it under the GFDL, or {{cc-by-sa-2.5}} to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, or use {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain.

If you did not create this media file but want to use it on Wikipedia, there are two ways to proceed. First, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list if you believe one of those fair use rationales applies to this file. Second, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.

If you have any questions please ask at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you. Sherool (talk) 21:18, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate images uploaded

Thanks for uploading Image:Prototype contour bottle.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you uploaded the same image twice: as Image:Prototype contour bottle.jpg and also as Image:Prototype contour bottle.psd.jpg. The latter copy of the file has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and remember exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 02:32, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Bottle sketch lowRes wiki.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Bottle sketch lowRes wiki.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 05:48, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:1915 proto hiRes.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:1915 proto hiRes.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ^Chillum 21:05, 28 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Modern coca cola bottle.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Modern coca cola bottle.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

Possibly unfree File:1915 proto hiRes.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:1915 proto hiRes.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

Speedy deletion nomination of File:1915 proto.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:1915 proto.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Soundvisions1 (talk) 11:17, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Bottle sketch coca-cola.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Bottle sketch coca-cola.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 01:38, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:ContourBottleConceptSketch.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:ContourBottleConceptSketch.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sven Manguard Wha? 04:46, 12 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of automated file description generation

Your upload of File:Beenie cropped.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 13:07, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:41, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Gavinmacqueen. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Gavinmacqueen. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Gavinmacqueen. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Contour prototype.gif

The file File:Contour prototype.gif has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Prototype contour bottle.jpg

The file File:Prototype contour bottle.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Earl r dean.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Earl r dean.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. James of UR (talk) 05:13, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Earl R. Dean standing with the johnny bull machine.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Earl R. Dean standing with the johnny bull machine.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Joseph2302 (talk) 11:10, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]