User talk:Gavinbarton

October 2017

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Sonic Mania has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Sonic Mania was changed by Gavinbarton (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.954872 on 2017-10-01T15:29:18+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:29, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

December 2019

Hello, I'm TheEpTic. I noticed that in this edit to Religious violence, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. TheEpTic (talk) 01:34, 8 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

April 2020

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Roe v. Wade, you may be blocked from editing. Elizium23 (talk) 03:41, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Newslinger. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, List of fake news websites, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Newslinger talk 04:08, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at List of fake news websites, you may be blocked from editing. — Newslinger talk 04:08, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Discretionary sanctions alerts for abortion and American politics

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in abortion. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Doug Weller talk 10:29, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

April 2020

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at One America News Network. — Newslinger talk 05:54, 24 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May 2022

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Occupy Democrats, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Dr. Swag Lord (talk) 01:31, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disruptive editing

You're making lots of serious mistakes and treating articles as if this were a chatroom or your own blog. Follow the hidden editorial instructions and seek consensus before changing that content. You're just going to get blocked doing this. -- Valjean (talk) (PING me) 20:13, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Eigenvalues and eigenvectors. Please stop making unwarranted, unexplained edits without first discussing them on the article's associated talk page. — Anita5192 (talk) 20:02, 27 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]