User talk:Gaurishankar 2016

This is Gaurishankar 2016's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (July 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by In veritas was:

This submission seems to be a test edit and not an article worthy of an encyclopedia. Please use the sandbox for any editing tests, but do not submit for review until you have an article that you want reviewed for inclusion in Wikipedia. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Gaurishankar 2016/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

In veritas (talk) 18:51, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Gaurishankar 2016, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! In veritas (talk) 18:51, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Help me!

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Please help me with... I have created the page, but dont know how to submit..

Gaurishankar 2016 (talk) 18:56, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

First, please add all additional available sources and also please see Help:Referencing_for_beginners#Manual_referencing; focus with actual news and NO press releases, social media profiles, interviews or trivial passing mentions. SwisterTwister talk 19:21, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

July 2016

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Pradeep Sardana, from its old location at User:Gaurishankar 2016/sandbox. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. Sam Sailor ^Talk! 00:26, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pradeep Sardana (July 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sam Sailor was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Pradeep Sardana and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sam Sailor ^Talk! 00:27, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Help me!

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Please help me with... I have saved few more reference links now. I hope this will prove the notability.. if not then please guide me about what all references you are looking for..i will provide the same.

Also, I am a member of Aadharshila, of which Mr. Pradeep Sardana is the president. We all members are keen to release this Wikipedia page, to reveal his immense contribution in the fields of journalism, art, culture and literature. It would be great if we can release this page by 29th July (on his Birthday) and can present him. Need your support for the same..Thanks.. Warm Regards

Gaurishankar 2016 (talk) 21:51, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

First of all, that's a conflict of interest edit. In addition to sources (showing notability), you have to be neutral. Please create the article in your sandbox first to see if it qualifies to be moved into the article space. —Hexafluoride ^{Ping me if you need help, or post on my talk} 22:01, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Edit: I've looked at Draft:Pradeep Sardana, and it looks like your submission has been declined. I can't see notability in the referenced articles. Some are passing mentions, others don't reference what you're writing. For a better outcome, please reference each individual statement or paragraph (using the <ref></ref> tag, and {{cite}} template). Please take a look at Help:Referencing_for_beginners as previously suggested. —Hexafluoride ^{Ping me if you need help, or post on my talk} 22:07, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pradeep Sardana (July 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Daniel kenneth was:

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Pradeep Sardana and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Daniel kenneth (talk) 16:40, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pradeep Sardana (August 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

For claims such as "youngest editor in country", see Help:Referencing for beginners#Manual referencing add all the best amounts of in-depth third-party news sources overall you can find; NO press releases, trivial passing mentions (which include only mere 1, 2 to 3 mentions), interviews and event listings, social media or anything non-news.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Pradeep Sardana and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 20:47, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pradeep Sardana (August 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gbawden was:

Please move references inline

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Pradeep Sardana and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Gbawden (talk) 08:54, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pradeep Sardana (August 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by David.moreno72 was:

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Pradeep Sardana and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

David.moreno72 04:01, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pradeep Sardana (September 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Abdullah Alam was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Pradeep Sardana and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Abdullah Alam (talk) 05:58, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Pradeep Sardana

Hello, Gaurishankar 2016. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Pradeep Sardana".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. 1989 06:50, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]