User talk:Gator MacReady
Welcome!
Hello, Gator MacReady, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}}
on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! NickelShoe (Talk) 16:40, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
An article you started on Crystal Breeze has been flagged as needing to be checked for notability. Wikipedia has a set of guidelines for articles about people at WP:BIO. There's actually a proposed guideline specifically for pornstars at WP:PORNBIO, which might be more helpful in trying to fill out the article.
I also added an {{unreferenced}} tag to the article, since it doesn't currently cite any sources for the information. Let me know if you need help with anything. NickelShoe (Talk) 16:40, 25 July 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for the work on Al Leong! -- BBlackmoor (talk) 01:20, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
Claire Robbins
[edit]A {{prod}} template has been added to the article Claire Robbins, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{db-author}}. • Gene93k 23:31, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Marcela Miscla
[edit]Marcela Miscla, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Marcela Miscla satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion (WP:PORNBIO) and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marcela Miscla and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Marcela Miscla during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Iamcuriousblue 00:33, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
Copyright problem: New Victoria Cinema
[edit]Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as New Victoria Cinema, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a copy from http://cinematreasures.org/theater/22117/, and therefore a copyright violation. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.
If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under allowance license, then you should do one of the following:
- If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:New Victoria Cinema and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, New Victoria Cinema, in your email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
- If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0, or that the material is released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:New Victoria Cinema with a link to where we can find that note.
- If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:New Victoria Cinema. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.
It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.
If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:New Victoria Cinema saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Deor (talk) 14:50, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
Copyright problems with Dominion Cinema
[edit]Hello. Concerning your contribution, Dominion Cinema, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://cinematreasures.org/theater/23061/. As a copyright violation, Dominion Cinema appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Dominion Cinema has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.
If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:
- If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Dominion Cinema and send an email with the message to permissions-enwikimedia.org. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
- If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) and CC-BY-SA, under CC-BY-SA, or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Dominion Cinema with a link to where we can find that note.
- If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Dominion Cinema.
However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Deor (talk) 14:50, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Meguru Kosaka
[edit]The article Meguru Kosaka has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Fails PORNBIO and the GNG. No awards or nominations. No relevant GBooks hits other than compilations of Wikipedia articles. Little or no independent reliable sourcing. Virtually all sources/references are self-published, promotional, or unselective databases.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo) (talk) 14:55, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
Nomination of Manami Yoshii for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Manami Yoshii is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manami Yoshii until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:15, 7 February 2018 (UTC)