User talk:Gatleyhead
|
These three edits remove content from User talk:ROBERT TAGGART and mention "right to vanish". Why are you making these edits? Given the contributions from ROBERT TAGGART (talk · contribs), I'm not sure "user in good standing" (as indicated in Wikipedia:Right to vanish) really applies. — Scientizzle 19:31, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
Blocked as a sockpuppet You have been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet of ROBERT TAGGART (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log). Blocked or banned users are not allowed to edit Wikipedia; if you are banned, all edits under this account may be reverted. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal the block by adding the text{{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. |
Gatleyhead (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
as one has said to another editor (Scientizzle) certain of you editors have got the wrong end of the stick... and run off with it ! Blank Robert Taggart as 'he' was finished with wikipedia until one of you 'revived' him ! This he did not / does not want. Gatleyhead ? all our edits are done.
Decline reason:
Given the activities associated with ROBERT TAGGART (talk · contribs) and various IPs, detailed here and here, WP:RTV doesn't apply. Please find another hobby. — Scientizzle 20:07, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.