User talk:Gateshead001

Disambiguation link notification for March 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Salisbury, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bath (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 29

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

2000 MI6 attack (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Cladding

List of terrorist incidents in London (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Kalashnikov

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

April 2018

Hello! Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. At least one of your edits on the page Malaysia Airlines Flight 17, while it may have been in good faith, was difficult to distinguish from vandalism. To help other editors understand the reason for the changes, you can use an edit summary for your contributions. You can also take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.--ז62 (talk) 16:02, 30 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (London Stock Exchange bombing) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating London Stock Exchange bombing, Gateshead001!

Wikipedia editor Kudpung just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Please clean up the naked URLs. For more information see WP:CITE

To reply, leave a comment on Kudpung's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 09:10, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 6

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Victoria station and Paddington station bombings (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Queen Elizabeth and Kenneth Baker

Edgar Pearce (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Whitton

List of terrorist incidents in London (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to PFLP

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:31, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sources needed for Days of the Year pages

You're probably not aware of this change, but Days of the Year pages are no longer exempt from WP:V and direct sources are required for additions. For details see the WikiProject Days of the Year style guide. I've gone ahead and added a source to back up your recent addition to March 14. Please try to find sources for additions to these pages as the burden to provide them is on the editor who adds or restores material to these pages. Thank you. Toddst1 (talk) 18:37, 12 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

WP:TROUBLES - 1RR notice and WP:RS warning

You may not be aware of the 1RR sanction on articles related to WP:TROUBLES but "WARNING: ACTIVE ARBITRATION REMEDIES" is clearly spelled out on Talk:The Troubles. You have engaged in edit warring on that article ([1], [2]). Further edit warring will lead to an immediate WP:Block and/or WP:SANCTIONS being applied to your account.

In addition, you have edited numerous articles adding information on the Troubles without direct sources. The WP:BURDEN of providing direct sources is on you and this is especially important on content subject to sanctions such as the Troubles. Continuing this behavior will also lead to an immediate WP:Block and/or WP:SANCTIONS. Toddst1 (talk) 18:57, 12 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 13

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Cavendish Square (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to John Lewis

Edgar Pearce (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Whitton

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:20, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Gateshead001. Please check your email; you've got mail!
Message added 00:01, 1 January 1970 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Ways to improve Stoke Newington Road lorry bomb

Hi, I'm Kudpung. Gateshead001, thanks for creating Stoke Newington Road lorry bomb!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please address the issue of naked URLs. For more information please see WP:CITE

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 04:48, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 2018 Wuppertal explosion

Hello, Gateshead001. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, 2018 Wuppertal explosion, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

edit the page
remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Dom from Paris (talk) 13:51, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your undiscussed move of 2017 Stockholm attack and several other similar pages

Hello. I have reverted your move since it was undiscussed, and controversial (since the new name does not adhere to the established name format for such articles). Do not move articles without a prior discussion on the talk page of the article, and consensus among editors there, a discussion that in controversial cases, such as this, should always be in the form of a formal requested move. So do not do it again. - Tom | Thomas.W ^talk 14:00, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

What happened to assuming good faith in that comment? Why several bolded words? Angry? The move made great sense, since there were many attacks in Stockholm that year and the name now reinstated is too confusing because it is not concise. Needs a better name. Think about it & try to come up with somthing constructive! --SergeWoodzing (talk) 15:52, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

According to Swedish media the 2017 terrorist attack on Drottninggatan in Stockholm was the first and sofar only terrorist attack in Sweden, so which other attacks are you referring to? As for assuming good faith, it's hard to do in a case like this, where the editor, based on their contributions, obviously knows how things work here, but chose to disregard all of it. - Tom | Thomas.W ^talk 16:30, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

When we choose or don't choose to assume good faith is not for you & me to decide. It's a fundamental WP guideline. I see no evidence at all that this user is a major sinner of any kind, so your severe reprimand was uncalled for. As for the article, let's discuss it there. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 15:17, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

So you can't name any other terrorist attacks in Sweden, but only made it up? Or did you really believe what Trump said? - Tom | Thomas.W ^talk 15:42, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

July 2018

Thank you for your contributions. It seems that you may have added public domain content to one or more Wikipedia articles, such as 1959 anti-American riots in Panama. You are welcome to import appropriate public domain content to articles, but in order to meet the Wikipedia guideline on plagiarism, such content must be fully attributed. This requires not only acknowledging the source, but acknowledging that the source is copied. There are several methods to do this described at Wikipedia:Plagiarism#Public-domain sources, including the usage of an attribution template. Please make sure that any public domain content you have already imported is fully attributed. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 14:33, 19 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar

Thanks for creating all the articles of the Provisional IRA bombs in England during The Troubles and also editing ones like the one I created 1974 London pillar box bombings and several others. It's important the history of the conflict is told and there was a big lack of knowledge on the conflict in England on Wiki up to a year ago when me and friends created around 20 articles on the subject in England. You have been a huge help in creating articles for England bombings. So thanks very much for the England articles & 1990's articles in Ireland on The Troubles like Banbridge & Lab bombings. Offey123 (talk) 21:35, 20 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much, gives me a great feeling to earn a badge here! And yes, I strongly agree the history is told - for obvious reasons schools in England barely teach anything about the events of Northern Ireland. The new articles of the England bombings have contributed to this and they themselves are from a wiki perspective good and well-sourced articles. --Gateshead001 (talk) 12:11, 21 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Service Award

This editor is an **Apprentice Editor** and is entitled to display this **Service Badge**.

Gateshead001, I hereby award you your Service Medal, based on your edit count and experience on Wikipedia. Thanks for creating Vienna temple attack--DBig Xray 19:15, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

August 2018

Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Fraunces Tavern, as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs) 21:57, 22 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Gateshead001. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]