Jump to content

User talk:GateKeeper/Archive 2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3Archive 4

Shocker

You're right[1], my apologies. Thanks for restoring the link. Euryalus (talk) 01:46, 6 January 2009 (UTC)

Joseph Priestley

The consensus for the article is no infobox. You introduced errors - he is buried in Northumberland, Pennsylvania, not Northumberland. I reverted - please discuss amy fuuture changes on the Joseph Priestley talk page. Thanks, Ruhrfisch ><>°° 06:34, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (File:TheGuildScreenShot01.JPG)

You've uploaded File:TheGuildScreenShot01.JPG, and indicated that it's used under Wikipedia's rules for non-free images. However, it's not presently used in any articles. Wikipedia policy requires that non-free images be either used or deleted, so if this image isn't used in an article in the next week, it will be deleted.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 13:51, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

Hi, I just want to tell you that User:Dana boomer has started reviewing this article at Talk:NBA Store/GA1. Hope it passes.—Chris! ct 02:07, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

I can give you some help if you want, too.—Chris! ct 02:13, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

The Guide to Deletion states: "To avoid confusing newcomers, the reasons given for deletion should avoid Wikipedia-specific acronyms." This nomination consists of nothing but Wiki-acronyms, and they are not even linked to the relevant policy pages, so it would be very difficult for a new user to have any idea what you are trying to say. Beeblebrox (talk) 06:39, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

Expanded to avoid confusion GateKeeper(X) @ 06:45, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
That's much better, Thanks! Beeblebrox (talk) 06:47, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

Re: BOHICA edits

I am curious about this and this edit, removing three external sources. Can you explain in more detail, please? I am going to revert the info back in for the time being, but am willing to self-revert after getting some convincing feedback from you on the topics of reliability, etc. - Arcayne (cast a spell) 18:04, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

Help!

I have improved the article The Last Castle a lot but since I'm not that good in grammar it would be really nice if u checked on it before I do a GA Nomination. Would really appreciate it. Thanks --Diaa abdelmoneim (talk) 17:27, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

Hello GateKeeper. You added mention of the RNA family SmY RNA at the header of the article on the ancient city of Smyrna. The content there is already highly flawed (and Feds may even be chasing it presently:) and needs clean-up. If you see no objection, I propose keeping the RNA's back in Smyrna (disambiguation). Anyone with interest and a basic knowledge on biomolecules could know the correct spelling and if not, could be guided by the disambiguation page. This message is to hear your viewpoint, I haven't changed anything yet. We don't add, For the vodka brand, see Smirnoff. Regards. Cretanforever (talk) 17:33, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

Barechested Article

In the article Barechested, why did you remove the link to the "Shirtless Lifestyle" group, which can be found here? The group is moderated, does not contain any objectionable content, and is lot more tame than some Wikipedia articles. A response would be appreciated. John Paul Parks (talk) 03:51, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

The guideline indicates that Yahoo! groups are "normally" to be avoided, and that each case is to be judged on its own merits. Therefore, please provide me with the detailed factual analysis that makes the link inappropriate. Please consider that the link relates directly to the topic of the article, and that the link has existed in the article for several months without objection. John Paul Parks (talk) 05:53, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

I've removed the link from Dress code and Barechested per WP:ELNO and WP:SPAM. --Ronz (talk) 16:33, 30 April 2009 (UTC)