User talk:Gashti Papad I

December 2023

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Please don't add see also sections when they are not closely relevant to the article (t · c) buidhe 05:18, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. Bishonen | tålk 06:39, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Gashti Papad I/Userboxes/This user is a cannibal

Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, the introduction of inappropriate pages, such as User:Gashti Papad I/Userboxes/This user is a cannibal, is considered vandalism and is prohibited. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. (t · c) buidhe 07:01, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note in case of unblock

In the rare case that it looks like this account should be unblocked, they might be a sock (t · c) buidhe 07:33, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Buidhe. I think I won't bother with tagging them. (Unless you can tell me a sockmaster account?) After all, they won't be unblocked before hell freezes over. Bishonen | tålk 11:03, 5 December 2023 (UTC).[reply]