User talk:Garygateaux

Hello, Garygateaux! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Pointillist (talk) 18:30, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: edit a page • upload and use images
Getting help
Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and guidelines
Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The community
Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Writing articles
Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Pages needing attention • Peer review
Miscellaneous
User name • User pages • Talk pages Clean up: General • Spam • Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

April 2009

Please do not add unsourced or original content. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Also WP:3RR. Kittybrewster ☎ 20:50, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Garygateaux (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have no idea why I have been blocked. Please explain.

Decline reason:

You were blocked for the abusive use of multiple accounts; we prefer that editors use just one account.FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 20:58, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

{{unblock|I only have this one account and don't know what I have done that is abusive}}

I have contacted the blocking administrator for further input on this matter. In the meantime, you should be aware that you are clearly edit warring at an article, and are also likely violating our Biography of Living Person policy in doing so. Even if you aren't abusing multiple accounts, you are behaving in a way that often merits a block. --Jayron32.talk.contribs 21:53, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Babylon93 I suspect. Kittybrewster ☎ 22:21, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I absolutely am not someone called "Babylon93". I find it amazing that you people can just pick on someone and act as judge, jury and executioner without any evidence whatsoever and without any recourse for me. No wonder people complain about the cartel of Wikipedia admins and the way they behave. I wish I had never bothered to get an account now - clearly I am not in the "in" crowd so stand no chance here.

No one really says that, except for people who get blocked for not following the rules. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 16:02, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

What kind of reasoned argument is that? You have effectively just confirmed that you ban whoever you want and are not accountable.

It is possible that you are not Babylon93. But your contributions and his were extraordinarily similar, disruptive, revertive, unsourced and WP:POV. You may find that if you recognise this and undertake not to edit in this way again, your block may be reviewed. The other thing you could do is seek to be adopted by a mentor. Please sign your posts. Kittybrewster ☎ 11:48, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ok - if I broke the rules then I am sorry and I undertake to make sure my edits abide by the rules in the future. How do I get a mentor and how does it work? I am not Babylon93 Garygateaux (talk) 11:52, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That is good enough for me. I have left a request with the blocking admin. Be patient. and read up on WP:ADOPTION. Kittybrewster ☎ 12:35, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Kitty Brewster. I will read all the rules and do my best to follow themGarygateaux (talk) 13:32, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):

Per above

Request handled by: — Matt Crypto 14:21, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unblocking administrator: Please check for active autoblocks on this user after accepting the unblock request.

please stop harassing my wife by vandalising her wikipedia entry or I will report youEdwardlucas (talk) 19:32, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]