User talk:Garycgibson

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Neo-Platonism and Christian Cosmology, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a direct copy from http://allphilosophy.com/topic/show/1623. As a copyright violation, Neo-Platonism and Christian Cosmology appears to qualify for speedy deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Neo-Platonism and Christian Cosmology has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If the source is a credible one, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GFDL, you can comment to that effect on Talk:Neo-Platonism and Christian Cosmology. If the article has already been deleted, but you have a proper release, you can reenter the content at Neo-Platonism and Christian Cosmology, after describing the release on the talk page. However, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia.

--Stifle 22:01, 16 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Neo-Platonism and Christian Cosmology may not be sufficiently well-known to merit articles of their own. The Wikipedia community welcomes newcomers, and encourages them to become Wikipedians. On Wikipedia, each user is entitled to a user page in which they can describe themselves, and this article's content may be incorporated into that page. However, to merit inclusion in the encyclopedia proper, a subject must be notable. We encourage you to write or improve articles on notable subjects. -Irishpunktom\^talk 00:11, 17 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

templates substituted by a bot as per Wikipedia:Template substitution Pegasusbot 04:35, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

July 2018

Hello. I had to undo some of your edits because they appeared to promote a self-published (WP:SELFPUB) book. Please note that Wikipedia is not a platform for promotion (WP:PROMOTION). Thank you, —Paleo Neonate – 18:28, 28 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

That's alright, unfortunately I am probably the best writer on the topic, and my book is a fairly unique yet correct point of view. You want to stop communication of true ideas.-Gary C Gibson

Hello again. The book is self-published via Lulu (please see WP:SPS, WP:RS, WP:IRS for more information on the type of sources expected for Wikipedia) and appears to be a collection of personal reflexions rather than a survey of the scholarly literature. This is not to insult your work, I'm also an author but would not refer to my material on Wikipedia. If you would like more editors to assess if the source can be used, I suggest asking at the public WP:RSN (reliable sources noticeboard). I hope this helps, —Paleo Neonate – 03:54, 15 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Russian super presidency

Hello, Garycgibson. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Russian super presidency".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. CptViraj (Talk) 06:10, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]