User talk:Gartuwaso

Welcome!

Hello, Gartuwaso, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Funmilayo Waheed Adekojo, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

Article development
Standard layout
Lead section
The perfect article
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page or you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! firefly ( t · c ) 15:53, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Funmilayo Waheed Adekojo

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Funmilayo Waheed Adekojo requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. firefly ( t · c ) 15:53, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A belated welcome

Hi Gartuwaso. Welcome to Wikipedia. I hope you don't mind if I share some of my thoughts on starting out as a new editor on Wikipedia: If I could get editors in your situation to follow just one piece of advice, it would be this: Learn Wikipedia by working only on non-contentious topics until you have a feel for the normal editing process and the policies that usually come up when editing casually. You'll find editing to be fun, easy, and rewarding. The rare disputes are resolved quickly and easily in collaboration.

Working on biographical information about living persons is far more difficult. Wikipedia's Biographies of living persons policy requires strict adherence to multiple content policies, and applies to all information about living persons including talk pages.

If you have a relationship with the topics you want to edit, then you will need to review Wikipedia's Conflict of interest policy, which may require you to disclose your relationship and restrict your editing depending upon how you are affiliated with the subject matter. Regardless, editing in a manner that promotes an entity or viewpoint over others can appear to be detrimental to the purpose of Wikipedia and the neutrality required in articles.

Some topic areas within Wikipedia have special editing restrictions that apply to all editors. It's best to avoid these topics until you are extremely familiar with all relevant policies and guidelines.

If you work from reliable, independent sources, you shouldn't go far wrong. WP:RSP and WP:RSN are helpful in determining if a source is reliable.

If you find yourself in a disagreement with another editor, it's best to discuss the matter on the relevant talk page.

I hope you find some useful information in all this, and welcome again. --Hipal (talk) 00:23, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

July 2022

Before adding a category to an article, as you did to User:Composermen, please make sure that the subject of the article really belongs in the category that you specified according to Wikipedia's categorization guidelines. The category being added must already exist, and must be supported by the article's verifiable content. Categories may be removed if they are deemed incorrect for the subject matter. There is no circumstance in which you are permitted to use mainspace categories on your userpage or anywhere outside of mainspace - do not keep doing this as it's disruptive. PRAXIDICAE🌈 16:00, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Also explain why you reverted me on a random users userpage that isn't even your own. PRAXIDICAE🌈 16:01, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I did not write to you here, there is a mistake I wrote you on the side of the warning notice. Composermen 18:06, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

So which account is yours, Composermen? PRAXIDICAE🌈 18:08, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is just my account https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Composermen 27 June 2022, I wrote the day you warned me but you did not reply, now you are writing to me from here. There is a mistake, I did not fully understand. Composermen 18:15, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No, I was warning the editor who reverted me on your userpage. PRAXIDICAE🌈 18:16, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

aha because I prepared an another article today, I sent it waiting for review, Simon Peter Hughes It was reviewed and I asked the same editor to review the other article. but I didn't write here, there is a big mistake. Composermen 18:34, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ANI and a warning

I suggest you back up your claims here that I or MB are friends or paid and take it to ANI or redact it. If you don't, I will be taking it there myself and requesting an indefinite block on your obviously bad faith account. PRAXIDICAE🌈 12:02, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I laugh 😂 as I see this message from you. No one will block me. Just because I use UPE on you that's why you will request block against me. Make you, I will appeal if you succeed by inviting your friends to come and comment. It's really amazing 😍 a person who normally nominated notable African articles, Indian articles and other low profile European and Asian exhausting your time on non notable actress. It 100% fail notability of living person. Google search shows nothing but Nigerian fake newspapers. Stop warning ⚠️, your titles will not make me fear 😨 you. Your request to block will never work. Administrators are not selfish and racist, they are well judge and non partisan people. Gartuwaso (talk) 13:22, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

So would you like to start that ANI thread with your evidence or shall I? PRAXIDICAE🌈 13:27, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know, the choice remains yours. Do whatever you want to do Gartuwaso (talk) 13:35, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.PRAXIDICAE🌈 13:35, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This will never make fear Gartuwaso (talk) 13:37, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

July 2022

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. GeneralNotability (talk) 14:27, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]