User talk:Garnet-Septagon

Welcome!

Hi Garnet-Septagon! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:13, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Martin Farquhar Tupper

The article Martin Farquhar Tupper you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Martin Farquhar Tupper and Talk:Martin Farquhar Tupper/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Mike Christie -- Mike Christie (talk) 02:22, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your GA nomination of Martin Farquhar Tupper

The article Martin Farquhar Tupper you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Martin Farquhar Tupper for comments about the article, and Talk:Martin Farquhar Tupper/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Mike Christie -- Mike Christie (talk) 19:03, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DYK

As it happens I've never done a DYK, so I wouldn't know how to review it! But I gather they operate a fairly robust system in which everyone who nominates one has to review one, so that probably means you will automatically get a reviewer. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 11:15, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

August 2023 Good Article Nominations backlog drive

Good article nominations \| August 2023 Backlog Drive
August 2023 Backlog Drive: On 1 August, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.
Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year. (t · c) buidhe 05:15, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Martin Farquhar Tupper

On 1 August 2023, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Martin Farquhar Tupper, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Martin Farquhar Tupper was a favourite poet of Queen Victoria, but his works are now almost entirely forgotten? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Martin Farquhar Tupper. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Martin Farquhar Tupper), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

RoySmith (talk) 00:03, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

Just a quick note to thank you for the GA review of Shaparak Khorsandi. Your improvement suggestions really helped make the article better. Much appreciated. Regards, BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 08:42, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Supreme Court of Mississippi GA review

Thank you for reviewing the article. Your comments were good and well-founded, but I would ask that next time you not quick-fail so quickly. In my experience the type of critiques you made were not the sort that would be impossible to address in a week's time. I would recommend you have a look at some other GA reviews with variety in extensiveness to gauge when to quick-fail. At they very least, you can always ask the nominator if they think the issues to can be rectified in a timely matter and if they don't think so, then you can fail the review. -Indy beetle (talk) 20:30, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your comment. I certainly didn't want to quick-fail the nomination, but I felt that the issues were so extensive that they would take a considerable amount of effort to address, and as I saw you were an experienced GA submitter I assumed that you had already brought the article up to the highest standard you were able to. If you can improve the article sufficiently I'd be happy to reassess it. Garnet-Septagon (talk) 20:56, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'll get cracking on it. I am an experienced nominator but I also have my blind spots, and there have been times for me both as a nominator and a reviewer where a new source or topic aspect has been introduced that leads to "Aha" moment. Some of your comments can be addressed directly with improvements to the article, but others have to be handled with explanations in the review (like if there's a lack source material on an issue which you think should be included, I have to argue that in the review, I can't write about it in article space so that the next reviewer sees it as resolved or addressed). -Indy beetle (talk)

@Indy beetle: Great; fix any that you think are reasonable and then you can address any others during the new GA review. It's worth noting that I made a mistake when I wrote about the number of sources - I saw after archiving the review that "Works Cited" doesn't cover all of them, and as I didn't get to a spot check I didn't look at them properly. Make sure you make references across the article consistent (GA criterion 2a: MOS:FNNR) before resubmitting. (talk) 21:52, 12 August 2023 (UTC)

I've almost always used Harvard style shortened footnotes with a Works Cited section for large sources from which I cite individual pages/sections, but not used the footnotes when the source I'm citing is a single web page or 1-2 page news article, for example. I've never had any issues with this and the example image at MOS:FNNR seems to depict this as well. -Indy beetle (talk) 22:41, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'd expect a section called Works Cited to contain all the works cited, so I thought perhaps over time the article had ended up with a blend of styles. But if I'm wrong about that then that's fine. Garnet-Septagon (talk) 07:13, 13 August 2023 (UTC) Garnet-Septagon (talk) 07:13, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for participating in the August 2023 GAN backlog drive

		The Minor Barnstar
		We really appreciate your efforts to review GANs. During the drive, the backlog of unreviewed nominations reduced by 440 articles, an astonishing 69 percent.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:06, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024 GAN backlog drive

Good article nominations \| March 2024 Backlog Drive
March 2024 Backlog Drive: On 1 March, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here or ask questions here.
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year.

(t · c) buidhe 02:39, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]