User talk:Gariwo

Speedy deletion of Gardens of the Righteous Worldwide

A tag has been placed on Gardens of the Righteous Worldwide requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later." You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Waterden (talk) 18:31, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

FYI Conflict of interest guideline

If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Gardens of the Righteous Worldwide, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors;
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam); and,
avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for businesses. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see our conflict of interest guidelines. Thank you. — Athaenara ✉ 21:53, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Gardens of the Righteous Worldwide

A tag has been placed on Gardens of the Righteous Worldwide requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later." You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. TN‑X-Man 13:57, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Giacomo Gorrini

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Giacomo Gorrini, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://gariwo.net/eng_new/giusti/giusto.php?cod=41. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 14:09, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Karen Jeppe

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Karen Jeppe, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://gariwo.net/eng_new/giusti/giusto.php?cod=67&categoria=166&sopra=157&sotto=166. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 14:40, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Gustav Herling

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Gustav Herling, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://gariwo.net/eng_new/giusti/giusto.php?cod=146. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 15:13, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Lev Emmanuilovic Razgon

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Lev Emmanuilovic Razgon, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://gariwo.net/eng_new/giusti/giusto.php?cod=35. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 15:31, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Permissions

Where did you send this email? Where did you post this notice on your website? I can't seem to find either. If you can point me to them (providing the subject line or sending email address for the permissions email would help me find it), I can help sort out everything. Please understand that (unlike the rest of the internet) Wikipedia takes potential copyright violations very seriously, and won't host any that seems to be copyrighted unless we have a clearly demonstrated free licence, or the material is known to be public domain. Sorry if it's a bit harsh, but respecting copyrights is a big deal for us. Cheers, Wily D 17:17, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem: Lev Emmanuilovic Razgon

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Lev Emmanuilovic Razgon, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a copy from http://gariwo.net/eng_new/giusti/giusto.php?cod=35, and therefore a copyright violation. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL), versions 1.3 or later then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Lev Emmanuilovic Razgon and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or that the material is released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Lev Emmanuilovic Razgon with a link to where we can find that note.
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Lev Emmanuilovic Razgon.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Lev Emmanuilovic Razgon saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! – Toon ^(talk) 22:28, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Lacking verification of this permission, I have deleted the duplicated text. However, I wanted to note that we already have an article on Lev Razgon. It certainly could use expansion. Please feel free to contribute to it, but unless you first verify permission you will have to use different text. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 13:38, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Additional permission necessary, Ayse Nur (Sarisözen) Zarakolu

We also need permission to use the text from the website for Ayse Nur (Sarisözen) Zarakolu. The process for this is not difficult; you have basically two options, if you are connected with the website.

The simplest way to verify is to place a release on that external website putting the material into public domain or releasing it under a license compatible with GFDL, which permits modification and reuse, even commercially, as long as authorship credit is given. This release is irrevocable and must continue to be displayed, or the material will need to be removed. A statement such as the following, including the link to the GFDL, would be sufficient: "The contents of this website (or page, if you are specifically releasing one section) are available for modification and reuse under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.3 and later." If you decide to take this route, please put a link to that release on Talk:Ayse Nur (Sarisözen) Zarakolu so we can restore the contents.

Alternatively, you may choose to send an e-mail to the Wikimedia Foundation from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL. There is a boilerplate release form at Wikipedia:Declaration of consent for all enquiries which can be helpful. Please provide a clear link to the website in your e-mail and specify by name the article on Wikipedia in which the material is being used. Once your e-mail is received and processed by a member of the Communications Committee, the article's contents will be restored if your release is legally sufficient. Please make a note that you've done this on Talk:Ayse Nur (Sarisözen) Zarakolu to help guard against premature deletion of the page. You can compose a note or very simply paste the following on the talk page, brackets and all: {{OTRS pending}}

We apologize for the additional steps necessary, but as copyright is a matter of legal concern, we must ensure that we not only protect the rights of copyright holders, but also guard the Wikipedia project against inadvertent infringement.

The article will be revisited in about a week to see what additional steps have been taken or may be necessary. If you have any questions or comments, please feel free to let me know at my talk page. We also have a help desk which is typically manned around the clock by volunteers.

Thank you. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 13:48, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Lacking verification for the above, I have written a new article on this individual at Ayse Nur Zarakolu. --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 16:37, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Antonia Locatelli

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Antonia Locatelli, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://gariwo.net/eng_new/giusti/giusto.php?cod=56&categoria=164&sopra=158&sotto=164. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 08:21, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Pierantonio Costa

A tag has been placed on Pierantonio Costa requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Nancy ^talk 10:45, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

LISTEN, IT'S ALWAYS ME, CAROLINA FROM GARIWO USING GARIWO MATERIAL FOR GARIWO PURPOSES, WHICH BY THE WAY ARE UNIVERSAL PURPOSES AS WE PROMOTE THE MEMORY OF THE RIGHTEOUS. I ALSO EDITED THE MATERIAL, WHICH DIDN'T LOOK THE SAME AS THE ORIGINAL FOR I KNOW YOU ARE ABLE TO TELL PEOPLE WRONG THINGS FOR MONTHS, BUT NOT TO LISTEN TO A SIMPLE REALITY AND AVOID DELETING OTHER PEOPLE'S WORK.

Copyright violations - final warning

Hi there, I can see from this talk page that you have been contacted on numerous occasions regarding your contiued introduction of copyright material to Wikipedia; the last instance as recently as this morning. As has been said to you before, Wikipedia takes copyright issues very seriously indeed and with this in mind I must warn you that if you post copyright material to Wikipedia again your account will be blocked from editing. It would also be appreciated if you could indicate whether you ahve posted any other text that is not your own work so that it can be removed forthwith.

The subjects of your article would appear to notable so I am sure that if you write them in your own words they will not be subject to deletion on other criteria. Good luck and kind regards, Nancy ^talk 11:00, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Nancy, sorry. It's always me, Carolina from Gariwo (www.gariwo.net). I need to spread as much Gariwo knowledge as possible through Wiki. As it is quicker and I am no English mothertongue, I usually first enter text directly from our Website, then put it into my own words as soon as I have time. I've already spoken to quite a lot of Wikipedia experts (for example Mr. Bisanz and Mr. Daley) and they know what I've been doing. They have told me Gariwo should release a GFDL license. Firm decisions are longer to take than individual ones. In the meanwhile I must review some entries and add content to them, doing as I told you, that is not infringing our own copyright, but trying to make the content production easier. We can't rewrite everything from scratch. All I need to sum up is some time to edit the entered text so that it doesn't look like our originals anymore, and some trust there is no infringement or there is only an intended "self-infringement" for cultural reasons. Thank you, Best regards, Carolina

Carolina, I understand your position but I'm sorry - if any text you post is copyright at the time of posting then it will be removed and you will be blocked. Copyright law is non-negotiable and no editor on Wikipedia has the right to over-rule it. There is nothing so urgent that it can't wait until the appropriate copyright releases have been obtained or else do your editing before hitting "save". I hope you can understand where we are coming from on this. Kind regards, Nancy ^talk 19:01, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Gulag

Hello. Your recent contribution is appreciated, but please, pay a bit more attention it to make it truly positive contribution. First of all, please, provide references, sources, to the statements you are going to make. Some of what you've inserted are opinions treated like facts ("the Gulags were not aimed at exploiting manpower"), something is inaccurate ("Immediately after the Revolution in 1917 ... based on the newly introduced article 58 of the penal code.", while the Article 58 was introduced first in 1926(compare 1922 and 58 Уголовного Кодекса РСФСР/вариант 1926 года 1926 editions).) Something is of dubious relevance -- e.g. repressions of kulaks were an important part of Stalin's policy of forced collectivization; but kulaks repressions weren't linked with Gulag. Besides, if you want to speak about collectivization, it wouldn't be excessive to note the lack of food supplies in 1927, caused by the price policies, what caused bolsheviks to break the existing system of interactions between urban and rural population. Etc.

You are invited to discuss the necessary changes at the article talk page. But let's not hurry, including to the article not sourced, not checked claims, ok? Regards, ellol (talk) 13:12, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Ellol, thank you. My source which I lacked the time to quote today is http://www.gariwo.net/eng_new/genocidi/gulag.php. Can you accept my contribution? Best regards, Carolina

Nomination of Pietro Kuciukian for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pietro Kuciukian is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pietro Kuciukian (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — PinkAmpers &^{(Je vous invite à me parler)} 18:35, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]