User talk:Garcon0101

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Garcon0101, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! User:MrMarkTaylor ^{What's that?/What I Do/Feed My Box} 00:20, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ivo Andrić

Could you at least offer some reasoning why you keep reverting back? You're only explanation is "Croatian University is biased" here. Discuss it at Talk:Ivo Andrić first. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 01:42, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Also, You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution.

Let us discuss it on the talk page here. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 02:17, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I will say this as a final warning. Remove the New York Times reference again and I'll will block you completely. I'm going out on a serious limb of good faith here. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 02:21, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I do want to apologize for my harshness earlier. I understood what you meant now. You would have been better off if you had said "CroatianHistory.net is not a reliable source" and just did a little edit on that. When you are doing something that you know looks controversial, it's best to focus on that edit alone and leave other things for later. Even though it's a little annoying, the more specific your edit summaries are, the less potential for dispute there is. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 05:31, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, I am new to editing wikipedia, and I can get a bit too enthusiastic when I see something that I find wrong. You were completely right to intervene and I'm glad you did. -- Garcon0101 (talk) 12:23, 14 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

June 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Beyond Good & Evil 2 has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Cxz111 (talk) 00:10, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

March 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Old Man Murray, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 02:42, 3 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]