User talk:Ganesh591

Welcome to Wikipedia!

Hello, Ganesh591, and welcome to Wikipedia!

An edit that you recently made seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox.

Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! IgnorantArmies (talk) 11:36, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

February 2016

Hello, Ganesh591, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as Ganesh992 (talk · contribs). Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who use multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. IgnorantArmies (talk) 11:45, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Chesnaught555. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to All Cricket Statistics— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Ches (talk) 17:53, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of "Test Cricket Records"

Test Cricket Records, a page you created, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is a test page. Use the sandbox for testing.

You are welcome to contribute content that complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 08:49, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Test Cricket Records

If you want to test or experiment, please do so in a "sandbox". May I suggest user:Ganesh591/Test Cricket Records? You can click the red link and start typing or copy your code from Test Cricket Records. You may want to add a link to your user page: user:Ganesh591 linking to that page. Just add [[user:Ganesh591/Test Cricket Records]] to your user page. (Leave off the nowiki stuff). Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 08:52, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sheffield Shield 2015-16

Hi there, I have noticed that on the recent edits you have made on the Sheffield Shield page, you have been putting down the Stumps updates in another format. eg. Day2:-Stumps- South Australia lead by 151 runs. You don't need to do this, you can just put Stumps, Day 2. Thanks, TheLabRats (talk) 07:55, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have again put New South Wales need 83 runs, there is no need for this edit. TheLabRats (talk) 22:35, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2015–16 Momentum One Day Cup, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Newlands. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:37, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

2015–16 Sunfoil Series

Hi. For the Round 6 match, why do you keep putting the score for the Dolphins in the wrong place? They batted first, so their score goes first. This is standard for scorecards, regardless of who the home team is. Thanks. Lugnuts ^{Dick Laurent is dead} 17:55, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at 2015–16 Sunfoil Series. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Do you understand what is being posted here? Please reply to confirm. Thanks. Lugnuts ^{Dick Laurent is dead} 15:37, 6 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

2015–16 Momentum One Day Cup

added a link pointing to Titans

2016 County Championship

added a link pointing to The Rose Bowl

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:52, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia, and particularly to cricket articles such as 2016 County Championship and 2015–16 Momentum One Day Cup. However, I've noticed a few issues which I would like to try and address:

It appears English may not be your first language- some of the content on 2015–16 Momentum One Day Cup made no sense, for example "Lions won the toss and options to field" and "Rain come today."
The "time=" parameter of a scorecard is for the time the match started, not what match number it is
You've been asked before by @Lugnuts:: the team that bats first is always listed first, no exceptions. Please stick to this rule.
Most of the content of 2016 County Championship was just a copy of 2015 County Championship- this isn't helpful, because not only is it incorrect for this season, it's also technically a copyright violation, as it wasn't properly attributed to the former article.
If you have problems, please ask for help- if it's about cricket articles, I'd recommend WT:CRIC. A user that wants to contribute and sometimes makes mistakes or needs help is a lot better than one who thinks they're always right and doesn't listen to advice. Joseph2302 (talk) 21:49, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Final warning

For the last time, the results column is for the result of the match, not for a match number you just made up. I've reverted your additions to 2016 County Championship because the match numbers dint even exist in reliable sources, and the fixture list was completely unsourced. Please pay attention to the above advice - if you ignore it again, then I'm going to have to report you to WP:ANI as a non-collaborative editor. I spent 2 hours yesterday cleaning up your mess in articles, please follow the standard Wikipedia conventions. Joseph2302 (talk) 07:23, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for vandalism. While some of the problems with editing looked like lack of understanding of what you are doing, edits such as this this and this can scarcely be seen as anything other than deliberate vandalism, and this edit where you not only vandalised an article but also gave a totally misleading edit summary, add further evidence of your lack of good faith. Also, such unambiguous vandalism edits are likely to reduce other editors' willingness to attribute your other disruptive edits to mistakes, rather than malice, which may mean that if you continue in the same way after this block expires, you may be given much less benefit of the doubt than you have in the past. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 12:50, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I see that, rather than following the instructions on how to request to be unblocked which I gave you in the block notice, you simply tried to evade the block by using another account. If you are blocked, that means that you do not have permission to edit: it does not mean that you are free to edit provided you use a different account. This account has now been blocked indefinitely, and the account you used to evade the block has been blocked for a week. Any request for an unblock should be made on the talk page of your original account. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 13:45, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Serves you right! No wonder I can't get any sense from your edit of the 2016 County Championship article. Thanks JamesBWatson! You're just awesome! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 175.142.219.235 (talk) 19:01, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Ganesh591. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]