User talk:Gandharraj

Nomination of Fadi Hammadeh (lawyer) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fadi Hammadeh (lawyer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fadi Hammadeh (lawyer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. 2Joules (talk) 06:54, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Australia’s Top 100 Graduate Employers for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Australia’s Top 100 Graduate Employers is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Australia’s Top 100 Graduate Employers until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 10:09, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Australia’s Top 100 Graduate Employers.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Australia’s Top 100 Graduate Employers.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:52, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Fadi Hammadeh at Abu Dhabi.jpg

The file File:Fadi Hammadeh at Abu Dhabi.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:03, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.A.Val.sol (talk) 20:30, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ANI DIscussion

There is an Administrators's Noticeboard discussion concerning you and your edits that you will want to participate in. Nosebagbear (talk) 22:11, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

June 2021

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for making personal attacks towards other editors.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Nosebagbear (talk) 21:27, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This was for repeated infringements against no personal attacks policy both generally and targeted. It does not factor in the edit-warring and similar related discussions currently at ANI. I specifically waive the need for any reviewing administrator to discuss the case with me to overturn the block. Nosebagbear (talk) 21:30, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]