User talk:Gammonwave

Duplicate images uploaded

Thanks for uploading Image:White Leaf Phenomenon.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:Whiteleaf2.jpg. The copy called Image:Whiteleaf2.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot (talk) 23:30, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of White leaf phenomenon

An editor has nominated White leaf phenomenon, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/White leaf phenomenon and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 02:44, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:White Leaf Phenomenon.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:White Leaf Phenomenon.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Firelement85 (talk) 05:15, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

List of notable people who regularly wear spandex

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article List of notable people who regularly wear spandex, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of List of notable people who regularly wear spandex. Gromlakh (talk) 00:47, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of List of notable people who regularly wear spandex

I have nominated List of notable people who regularly wear spandex, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of notable people who regularly wear spandex. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Gromlakh (talk) 00:56, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

January 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Stede Bonnet, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. --Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 02:17, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living persons, as you did to List of notable people who regularly wear spandex. Thank you. --Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 02:21, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unreferenced controversial biographical content to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at List of notable people who regularly wear spandex. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 02:46, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Snowball delete

See WP:SNOW; a Snowball delete is when an article doesn't stand a snowball's chance of being kept. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 03:02, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of List of notable people who regularly wear spandex

A tag has been placed on List of notable people who regularly wear spandex, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. h i s ^{s p a c e} _{r e s e a r c h} 14:17, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]