User talk:Gammon

Talk page comment removal

Please do not remove other people's comments from article's talk pages. Thanks. --ozzmosis 06:23, 31 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Victor Dominello Etheringtons.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Victor Dominello Etheringtons.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 08:05, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with File:Victor Dominello Etheringtons.jpg

Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:Victor Dominello Etheringtons.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.etheringtons.com.au/team/victor_dominello.htm. As a copyright violation, File:Victor Dominello Etheringtons.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:Victor Dominello Etheringtons.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at File talk:Victor Dominello Etheringtons.jpg and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) and CC-BY-SA, under CC-BY-SA, or released into the public domain leave a note at File talk:Victor Dominello Etheringtons.jpg with a link to where we can find that note.
If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on File talk:Victor Dominello Etheringtons.jpg.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Rob.au (talk) 03:04, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Electoral district of Ryde

Hi there. Numbering each member is a pretty big change to go into without discussion. Can I suggest raising it here before going any further? I've reverted your edits for the time being, as this would require an across-the-board change. Frickeg (talk) 07:36, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia! Well, my own humble opinion is that the numbering of members in the electorate page is unnecessary (although there's no problem with noting on the member's page that he/she is the "15th member for ###"). I had a look at Victor Dominello and it's not looking too bad. I'm impressed by your careful use of references - just remember that the full stop comes before the citation. As a member of his staff, however, you need to be very careful editing in this area, because it brings up issues with both conflict of interest and neutral point of view. At the least, I would state clearly on your user page that you work for Dominello in the interests of disclosure. I do not see any bias in your edits, which is a refreshing change (we've had problems with politicians and their staff editing their pages before), but it's something to keep in mind. Some people may feel that editing in NSW politics at all while you're employed by an MP is a conflict of interest, so just be careful.

I would also caution that it is Dominello's political career, not his legal career, that makes him notable. The detail at the moment concerning his legal career is probably unnecessary and may be considered non-notable. I would try to summarise it into a few longer paragraphs (three at most) before doing anything else. Also with the picture - you need specific proof that it's in the public domain. I couldn't see any on the page cited as a source for it. Good luck and welcome once again. Please don't hesitate to drop me a line if you need any help at all. Frickeg (talk) 23:06, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Gammon for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 04:23, 16 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked 1 week for sock puppetry. (blocked by MuZemike 20:09, 19 October 2009 (UTC))[reply]
You may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but please read our guide to appealing blocks first.

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Gammon for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. — Jeff G. ツ 15:08, 22 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your block has been reset because of your usage of an IP to evade your block. It ends 1 week from now. MuZemike 16:34, 22 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:01, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]