User talk:Gamechanger

Kim Dong-hyun

Hi, please don't remove Kim's amateur record. If you know of any other fighters who have one (and that is verifiable, such as Kim's is) please add it to their page. Thanks, --aktsu ^(t / c) 18:38, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Again please don't remove it. It is verifiable and as much part of his career as his pro fights. If you know the amateur record on other fighters please feel free to add it. See Ryan Couture for another fighter who's amateur record is listed (though he's not currently a pro fighter, the point is that his record is known). --aktsu ^(t / c) 18:50, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"Amateur records only count for when the fighter is an amateur lol, and i know plenty of fighters amateur records, theres just no reason for adding them." Why is there no reason to add it? It it part of his career as a fighter. His amateur career doesn't disappear the moment he become pro. Do you also think amateur wrestlers college careers should be removed from their articles if they go to the Olympics? --aktsu ^(t / c) 19:00, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"Who says the fight didn't happen ? What does that have to do with showing an amateur record on a professional page ?". It isn't a "professional page", it is an article on Kim's life, not just one part of it. --aktsu ^(t / c) 19:03, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"Not about his life"? The name of the article isn't "Kim Dong-hyun's professional MMA career", it's "Kim Dong-hyun". I think you're maybe misunderstanding the purpose of an encyclopaedia. This isn't supposed to be a mirror of Sherdog's Fight Finder. --aktsu ^(t / c) 19:13, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Correct me if I'm wrong, but you're basically saying all info not directly related to a person's current status should be removed from articles? All "personal life"-sections, everything about what they did before what they do now etc? Nothing about a minor league career if someone's playing in the MLB, nothing about a college football career if someone's playing in the NFL? --aktsu ^(t / c) 19:21, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

August 2009

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Kim Dong-hyun. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. --aktsu ^(t / c) 18:58, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 19:20, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for violating the three-revert rule at Kim Dong-hyun. Please be more careful to discuss controversial changes or seek dispute resolution rather than engaging in an edit war. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. So Why 19:22, 1 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]