User talk:Galonga

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 01:59, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of 1hourflex

A tag has been placed on 1hourflex, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. DWZ ^{(talk • email • contribs)} 12:55, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

1hourflex

Hello, Galonga. You have new messages at DWZ's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

September 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page User talk:Lectonar has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. ~~ Dr Dec (Talk) ~~ 13:40, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 13:43, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion review

Hello, Galonga. You have new messages at DWZ's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page User talk:Lectonar has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Dreadstar ☥ 20:23, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page User talk:Lectonar. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Martin451 (talk) 20:24, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not attack other contributors, as you did with this edit to User talk:Lectonar. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Alan (talk) 20:25, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I also recommend reviewing WP:3RR as well as WP:TALK, as well as WP:N and WP:RS. Dreadstar ☥ 20:48, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

- Sorry for coming back to you so late; I'll echo what Dreadstar said above and repeat my reasoning: there are no reliable sources, as wikipedia sees them. Lectonar (talk) 12:57, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your decorum on articles

Don't leave antagonistic messages or instructions on article spaces. If you create content that is not suitable, it will get deleted and then you can engage in deletion review, or pre-empt it by adding the hang on template to a speedy delete notice. If you are working on an article and don't wish to see it deleted mid-work, use the {{under construction}} template. If you create content that is suitable for Wikipedia, it will be kept and edited. There is no course of action that requires any such antagonistic decorum. SGGH ^ping! 16:06, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Seriously, what SGGH said. Don't put your personal commentary in articles, or take out your frustrations in them. (And don't re-add commentary after it's been removed.) If you're having problems with articles being deleted, I'd suggest you create them in your userspace, such as at User:Galonga/1hourflex. That will give you much more, but not unlimited, time to work on it without worry of deletion.--Fabrictramp | talk to me 21:16, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Janauary 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, please do not add promotional material to articles or other Wikipedia pages, as you did to E85 in standard engines. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" is strongly discouraged. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. --Dbratland (talk) 23:49, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of 1hourflex

An article that you have been involved in editing, 1hourflex, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1hourflex. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Dbratland (talk) 00:03, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 17:11, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

January 2010

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1hourflex, you will be blocked from editing. —KuyaBriBri^Talk 21:40, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not attack other editors, as you did here: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1hourflex. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. —KuyaBriBri^Talk 21:41, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as those you made to User talk:MuffledThud. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. —KuyaBriBri^Talk 21:43, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

Materialscientist (talk) 22:10, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of 1hourflex

A tag has been placed on 1hourflex, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Stroppolo^talk 21:48, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

March 2010

Please stop. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. If you need guidance on how to create appropriate pages, try using the Article Wizard. Acroterion _(talk) 21:51, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of 1hourflex

A tag has been placed on 1hourflex, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. I42 (talk) 22:19, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for spamming or advertising. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. rʨanaɢ (talk) 22:45, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]