Awards etc.

An award for you

Golden Wiki Award

In recognition of all the work you’ve done lately! 66.87.7.36 (talk) 20:26, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you

		The Modest Barnstar
		You are among the top 5% of most active Wikipedians this past month! 67.80.64.128 (talk) 01:24, 15 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WikiThanks

Thanks for your recent contributions! 67.80.64.128 (talk) 13:51, 28 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Messages

Feel free to leave a message for me below. But please keep in mind that I do not check the page frequently. So if it is something urgent, consider sending me an e-mail instead. Thanks. Galapah (talk) 09:27, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Trifonov

Thanks for email, I'm just back from holiday, so it will be a couple of days before I can take a proper look. What are you aiming for — Just improving the article in general, or Good/Featured article status?

A couple of first thoughts

The tone is a bit hagiographic in places — He is renowned for his innovative insights into the world of biological sequences. is presented as a fact, without any reference or comment
I would query whether his honours and appointments should precede the work itself
Journal titles should be italicised, and I also doubt that there is any point red-linking journal titles unless you are going to write articles for them
There is a bit of MoS needs fixing, but I'll look in more detail when I get time

Jimfbleak - talk to me? 05:52, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comments 1

I'm still working through, edits so far. I think the main issues are more organisational than any serious problems with your very good English

"unveiled multiple novel codes in biological sequences" — with no links or explanation, this is a bit daunting for a non-specialist to find in the lead
I'm not sure the lead is adequate, but perhaps best to wait until the rest of the article is sorted
I Still query whether his honours and appointments should precede the work itself. Presumably he received the honours and appointments as a result of his work, so they should follow that section
"bp" is not linked or explained
The sections after chromatin are not pretty, with multiple heading levels, very listy, little continuous prose. If all this needs to be there, you can either try to improve it yourself, or leave it to my tender mercies
Just curious, what made you decide on American English for a Russian-Israeli biography?

Jimfbleak - talk to me? 14:17, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reply, I'll carry on with the rest of the text, but it will probably after the weekend now

"unveiled multiple novel codes in biological sequences" — I was thinking more in terms of wikilinks than sources.
With regard to the quote I removed, if it can be sourced, that's fine, but I think "known" would be a bit less pov than "renowned" Jimfbleak - talk to me? 19:15, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Jimfbleak - talk to me? 19:15, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting review of Folding@home

Hi there Galapah,

I saw that you've listed your name over at WP:PRV. I've been enthusiastically editing pretty extensively on Folding@home, and achieved GA status early last month. It's an article about a powerful distributed computing project which simulates protein folding for disease research, so I thought you might be interested. I'd like to improve the article as much as I can, and perhaps even reach FA status, so if you have a moment, I'd sure appreciate any advice or suggestions you may have. Thank you for your time, Jesse V. (talk) 21:28, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 9 May

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Saturated fat and cardiovascular disease controversy page, your edit caused an unsupported parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:41, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:40, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Galapah. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Galapah. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A couple of discretionary sanctions alerts for you

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions. Bishonen | talk 09:06, 28 May 2018 (UTC).[reply]

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions. Bishonen | talk 09:06, 28 May 2018 (UTC).[reply]

Hi, Galapah. These alerts relate to your posts on Talk:Lauren Southern. Please note that they don't imply any wrongdoing on your part. I only want to make you aware that administrators have extensive discretionary powers to sanction any disruption in the areas of American politics and biographies of living people. Bishonen | talk 09:06, 28 May 2018 (UTC).[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Galapah. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]