User talk:Gaga690

Barnstar

		The Music Barnstar
		For your continuous efforts to improve articles related to Lady GaGa, mostly for the better, but sometimes misguided and for the worst. :D --ĈÞЯİŒ 1ооо 19:41, 17 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

August 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Roar (Katy Perry song) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

perrys-roar-arrives-early-listen|work=[[Billboard (magazine)]]|publisher=Prometheus Entertainment]|accessdate=10 August 2013}}</ref> It is expected to be released digitally on Sunday, August 11.<

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 01:11, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Applause (song), you may be blocked from editing. —Indian:BIO · ^{[ ChitChat ]} 06:00, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Applause (song) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. —C.Fred (talk) 12:54, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

September 2013

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Applause (song), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. —Indian:BIO · ^{[ ChitChat ]} 18:33, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. —rybec 20:41, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

See the result of this edit warring complaint, which contains a warning for you: WP:AN3#User:Gaga690 reported by User:Rybec (Result: Warned). If you continue to blank out material from the Applause (song) article without participating in discussions you may be blocked. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 15:42, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

July 2014

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Christina Aguilera. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 00:44, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

In reply to this message at my talk page:

Thank you for your input, fan. I cannot, however, let those lies remain on the biography. XOXO - Legendtina

I'm calling your bluff. Provide a reliable source for the "Legend of the United States" title that you added to the introduction or the name. In the absence of reliable sources, those statements are so outrageous that they appear to be vandalism—and without sources, they must be removed. —C.Fred (talk) 00:50, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

January 2015

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Ariana Grande. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. Chamith (talk) 02:02, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

February 2015

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Snuggums (talk / edits) 23:04, 3 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:25, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

December 2015

Good night user, you are making a mistake as to Undo my edit on the page "Nicki Minaj discography", it has two sources, and both are reliable. They are the official website of Nicki Minaj in your social network. Wikipedia supports any source that is completely reliable, this source we are talking about the same Nicki Minaj. Wikipedia does not only support a coming supply of WRolling StoneW. Please stop undoing my edit. --Mixitnew (talk) 02:52, 19 December 2015 (UTC)Mixitnew[reply]

Worldwide sales of The Pinkprint dispute

Please discuss the dispute on the talk page section I made on the article. Edit warring can get you blocked. Thank you. -- Joseph Prasad (talk) 03:05, 19 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:Gaga690/Sandbox

User:Gaga690/Sandbox, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Gaga690/Sandbox and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Gaga690/Sandbox during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Ricky81682 (talk) 23:21, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Gaga690. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]