User talk:Gacolditz
--Gacolditz (talk) 22:52, 4 August 2012 (UTC)--Gacolditz (talk) 22:52, 4 August 2012 (UTC) Hello, Gacolditz. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Graham Colditz, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.
All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.
If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:
- Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
- Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
- Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
- Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.
Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.
For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you.MuppetLabTech (talk) 21:47, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
- Graham, if you're reading this and have more citations/references, please post them on the article's Talk Page and I'll work on the article. If you keep your edits to the tone you've managed to adhere to so far you won't fall foul of the wikipolice. See the message above for more details.MuppetLabTech (talk) 21:57, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
Not ure if you want the references added here or on the edited version. The original piece was drafted and entered by a colleague who lives in Idaho. I noticed some of the links were no longer working - Knol was removed form the web by Google, so i was trying to update some of these links top functional ones.
you might see https://news.wustl.edu/news/Pages/21265.aspx but that its an own institution piece - the AACR citation for that award and the ACS citation make sense as i added them...
could add a number of books and their full citation too if that would be useful. Also here is a link to upcoming keynote at international union against cancer conference later this month...
like willett i am noted in highly cited... thought this is not a thing they update anymore http://www.in-cites.com/top/2007/first07-cli.html research crossroads generates a listing of federal funded grants http://www.researchcrossroads.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=49&Itemid=55&user_id=681616
Books and Other Monographs
1. Oster G, Colditz GA, Kelly NL. The economic costs of smoking and benefits of quitting. DC Heath. Lexington Mass, 1984.
2. Cancer Prevention: The Causes and Prevention of Cancer Volume 1. Kluwer Academic Publisher, The Netherlands. Colditz GA and Hunter D, (eds). 2000.
3. Healthy Women, Healthy Lives. A Guide to Preventing Disease from the Landmark Nurses’ Health Study. Hankinson S, Colditz GA, Manson JE, and Speizer FE (eds) Simon and Schuster Source, NY 2001.
4. Glasziou P, Irwig L, Bain C, Colditz G. Systematic reviews in health care: a practical guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2001.
5. Colditz GA, Stein CJ. Handbook of Cancer Risk Assessment and Prevention. Cancer risk assessment and prevention. Jones and Bartlett Publishers, Inc; 2004.
6. Colditz GA. Encyclopedia of Cancer and Society. Sage Publications, Inc. 2007 Vol 2. General Editor: G.A. Colditz
7. Brownson RC, Colditz GA, Proctor EK. Dissemination and Implementation Research in Health: Translating research to practice. OUP
IOM Reports including material drafted by Graham A. Colditz, MD, DrPH
Veterans and Agent Orange. Health Effects of Herbicides Used in Vietnam. Committee to Review the Health Effects in Vietnam Veterans of Exposure to Herbicides; Institute of Medicine, National Academies Press, Washington DC, 1994
Veterans and Agent Orange. Health Effects of Herbicides Used in Vietnam. Committee to Review the Health Effects in Vietnam Veterans of Exposure to Herbicides; Institute of Medicine, National Academies Press, Washington DC, Updated 1996
Behavioral Risk Factors (Chapter 3) in Health and Behavior: The Interplay of Biological, Behavioral, and Societal Influences. Committee on Health and Behavior: Research, Practice and Policy. Board of Neuroscience and Behavioral Health. Institute of Medicine, National Academies Press, Washington, DC 2001
Fulfilling the Potential of Cancer Prevention and Early Detection, Curry SJ, Byers T, Hewitt M, Editors, National Cancer Policy Board, Institute of Medicine National Research Council of the National Academies, The National Academy Press, Washington DC, 2003
-Chapter 2. Potential to Reduce the Cancer Burden Through Cancer Prevention and Early Detection, p30-40. -Chapter 3. Lifestyle Behaviors Contributing to the Burden of Cancer, p41-86
An Assessment of Potential Health Effects from Exposure to Pave Paws Low-Level Phased-Array Radiofrequency Energy, Board on Radiation Effects Research, Division on Earth and Life Sciences, National Research Council of The National Academies. The National Academies Press, 2006 Washington, DC. www.nap.edu.
--Gacolditz (talk) 22:52, 4 August 2012 (UTC)
Biographical details
[edit]Hi again Graham.
Do you have a links to a source that would have some biographical details ? Sadly we can't just have you add them, they need to be verifiable as per this definition http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Verifiability. And anything with a good career summary ?
Also, if you have a decent photo that you would be preapred to donate to Wikimedia commons, we could use that.
Impressive career, judging from the awards, by the way. MuppetLabTech (talk) 21:08, 8 August 2012 (UTC)